A retrospective comparison of mechanical cardio-pulmonary ventilation and manual bag valve ventilation in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: A study from the Belgian cardiac arrest registry.

BACKGROUND: The optimal ventilation modalities to manage out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remain debated. A specific pressure mode called cardio-pulmonary ventilation (CPV) may be used instead of manual bag ventilation (MBV). We sought to analyse the association between mechanical CPV and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in non-traumatic OHCA. METHODS: MBV and CPV were retrospectively identified in patients with non-traumatic OHCA from the Belgian Cardiac Arrest Registry. We used a two-level mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the association between the ventilation modalities and outcomes. The primary and secondary study criteria were ROSC and survival with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2 at 30 days. Age, sex, initial rhythm, no-flow duration, low-flow duration, OHCA location, use of a mechanical chest compression device and Rankin status before arrest were used as covariables. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and December 2021, 2566 patients with OHCA who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. 298 (11.6%) patients were mechanically ventilated with CPV whereas 2268 were manually ventilated. The use of CPV was associated with greater probability of ROSC both in the unadjusted (odds ratio: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.63; p = 0.043) and adjusted analyses (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.16, 95%CI 1.37-3.41; p = 0.001) but not with a lower CPC score (aOR: 1.44, 95%CI 0.72-2.89; p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MBV, CPV was associated with an increased risk of ROSC but not with improved an CPC score in patients with OHCA. Prospective randomised trials are needed to challenge these results.

Development and validation of an audit tool for fluid management in non-critically ill adults in the emergency department.

Especially in the emergency department (ED), it is critical to identify weaknesses in prescribing behavior of IV maintenance fluids to ensure a qualitative 24-h fluid management plan. The primary aim of this study was to develop an audit instrument to assess the pitfalls in documentation and prescribing habits of IV fluid therapy for non-critically ill patients admitted to the ED. In this study, an expert panel initially designed the tool. During different phases, adaptations were made to optimize inter-rater agreement (Fleiss' kappa, κ) and validity was determined based on the application of the tool on randomly selected electronic ED patient records. Second, the IV fluid prescription's appropriateness was addressed. The final tool consists of three parts: fluid status assessment, evaluation of maintenance fluid needs and, if present, a limited appropriateness check of the fluid prescription. A manual enhanced inter-rater agreement. κ-values achieved the target value (0.40) after three adaptation rounds, except for the category of 'clinical observations' in the assessment part (κ = 0.531, 95% CI 0.528-0.534), which was acceptable. A check of the IV fluid's indication and volume was only possible with an additional expert evaluation to conclude on prescription appropriateness. Criterion related validity of the final version was high (93.4%). To conclude, the instrument is considered reliable and can be used in clinical practice to evaluate ED fluid management. Thorough documentation is essential to evaluate the appropriateness of the IV fluid prescription, to improve information transfer on IV fluid therapy to the ward and to facilitate retrospective chart review of ED prescribing behavior.

Interdisciplinary knowledge gaps on intravenous fluid management in adult patients: Survey among physicians and nurses of a university hospital.

RATIONALE: Intravenous (IV) fluids are frequently involved in iatrogenic complications in hospitalized patients. Knowledge of IV fluids seems inadequate and is not covered sufficiently in standard medical education. METHODS: Two surveys were developed, based on the 2016 British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline 'IV fluid therapy in adults in hospital', to provide insight on the learning needs and expectations of physicians and nurses. Each survey focused on profession-specific practice and consisted of three parts: demographics, knowledge questions and evaluation of current habits. Physicians and nurses practicing in a Belgian university hospital were invited to complete the survey electronically, respectively, in January and May 2018. RESULTS: A total of 103 physicians (19%) and 259 nurses (24%) participated. Although every indication for fluid therapy may require a specific fluid and electrolyte mixture, and hence, knowledge of their exact composition, most physicians and nurses did not know the composition of commonly prescribed solutions for IV infusion. Senior physicians did not score better than juniors did on questions concerning the daily needs of a nil-by-mouth patient. The availability of an IV fluid on the ward guides physicians to prescribe IV fluids (17%). Nurses (56%) feel they share responsibility in fluid management as they frequently intervene in urgent situations. More than half of participants (70% of physicians, 79% of nurses) indicated a need for additional information. CONCLUSIONS: A clear need for more structured information on IV fluids was identified. Both physicians and nurses struggle with fluid therapy. Continuing education on IV fluid management, emphasizing multidisciplinary collaboration, and monitoring evidence-based practice is essential to support the clinical decision process in daily practice.

Feasibility of absolute cerebral tissue oxygen saturation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

INTRODUCTION: Current monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is limited to clinical observation of consciousness, breathing pattern and presence of a pulse. At the same time, the adequacy of cerebral oxygenation during CPR is critical for neurological outcome and thus survival. Cerebral oximetry, based on near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), provides a measure of brain oxygen saturation. Therefore, we examined the feasibility of using NIRS during CPR. METHODS: Recent technologies (FORE-SIGHT™ and EQUANOX™) enable the monitoring of absolute cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (SctO2) values without the need for pre-calibration. We tested both FORE-SIGHT™ (five patients) and EQUANOX Advance™ (nine patients) technologies in the in-hospital as well as the out-of-hospital CPR setting. In this observational study, values were not utilized in any treatment protocol or therapeutic decision. An independent t-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Our data demonstrate the feasibility of both technologies to measure cerebral oxygen saturation during CPR. With the continuous, pulseless near-infrared wave analysis of both FORE-SIGHT™ and EQUANOX™ technology, we obtained SctO2 values in the absence of spontaneous circulation. Both technologies were able to assess the efficacy of CPR efforts: improved resuscitation efforts (improved quality of chest compressions with switch of caregivers) resulted in higher SctO2 values. Until now, the ability of CPR to provide adequate tissue oxygenation was difficult to quantify or to assess clinically due to a lack of specific technology. With both technologies, any change in hemodynamics (for example, ventricular fibrillation) results in a reciprocal change in SctO2. In some patients, a sudden drop in SctO2 was the first warning sign of reoccurring ventricular fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Both the FORE-SIGHT™ and EQUANOX™ technology allow non-invasive monitoring of the cerebral oxygen saturation during CPR. Moreover, changes in SctO2 values might be used to monitor the efficacy of CPR efforts.