RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Joint manipulation is generally used to reduce musculoskeletal pain; however, evidence has emerged challenging the effects associated with the specificity of the manipulated vertebral segment. The aim of this study was to verify immediate hypoalgesic effects between specific and non-specific cervical manipulations in healthy subjects. METHOD: Twenty-one healthy subjects (18-30 years old; 11 males, 10 females) were selected to receive specific cervical manipulation at the C6-7 segment (SCM) and non-specific cervical manipulation (NSCM) in aleatory order. A 48h interval between manipulations was considered. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was measured pre- and post-manipulation with a digital algometer on the dominant forearm. RESULTS: The SCM produced a significant increase in the PPT (P < 0.001) however no difference was observed in the PPT after the NCSM (P = 0.476). The difference between the two manipulation techniques was 37.26 kPa (95% CI: 14.69 to 59.83, p = 0.002) in favor of the SCM group CONCLUSION: Specific cervical manipulation at the C6-7 segment appears to increase PPT on the forearm compared to non-specific cervical manipulation in healthy subjects.
Assuntos
Manipulação da Coluna , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Cervicalgia , Medição da Dor , Limiar da Dor , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the hypoalgesic effects of isolated or combined use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and cervical joint manipulation (JM) in asymptomatic participants. METHODS: One hundred and forty-four healthy participants aged 18 to 30 years old were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups (nâ¯=â¯36 per group): active TENSâ¯+â¯active JM, active TENSâ¯+â¯placebo JM, placebo TENSâ¯+â¯active JM, and placebo TENSâ¯+â¯placebo JM. Active or placebo TENS was applied to the dominant forearm. JM was applied to the C6-7 segments. The pressure pain threshold was measured pre- and postintervention and after 20 minutes on the forearm and tibialis anterior of the dominant side. RESULTS: Segmental hypoalgesia was greater in the group active TENSâ¯+â¯active JM compared with active TENSâ¯+â¯placebo JM (Pâ¯=â¯.002), placebo TENSâ¯+â¯active JM (P < .0001), and placebo TENSâ¯+â¯placebo JM (P < .0001). For the extrasegmental hypoalgesia, active TENSâ¯+â¯active JM had greater hypoalgesic effect compared with active TENSâ¯+â¯placebo JM (Pâ¯=â¯.033), placebo TENSâ¯+â¯active JM (Pâ¯=â¯.002), and placebo TENSâ¯+â¯placebo JM (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: TENS and JM produced hypoalgesia when used alone and, when the treatments were combined, a higher segmental and extrasegmental hypoalgesic effect was obtained in asymptomatic participants.