Focused cardiac ultrasound with mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) detection of left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: Detecting reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by an emergency physician (EP) is an important skill. The subjective ultrasound assessment of LVEF by EPs correlates with comprehensive echocardiogram (CE) results. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) is an ultrasound measure of vertical movement of the mitral annulus, which correlates to LVEF in the cardiology literature, but has not been studied when measured by an EP. Our objective is to determine whether EP measured MAPSE can accurately predict LVEF <50% on CE. METHODS: This is a prospective observational single center study using a convenience sample to evaluate the use of a focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) for patients with possible decompensated heart failure. The FOCUS included standard cardiac views to estimate LVEF, MAPSE, and E-point septal separation (EPSS). Abnormal MAPSE was defined as <8 mm and abnormal EPSS as >10 mm. The primary outcome assessed was the ability of an abnormal MAPSE to predict an LVEF <50% on CE. MAPSE also was compared to EP estimated LVEF and EPSS. Inter-rater reliability was determined by two investigators performing independent blinded review. RESULTS: We enrolled 61 subjects, 24 (39%) had an LVEF <50% on a CE. MAPSE <8 mm had a 42% sensitivity (95% CI 22-63), 89% specificity (95% CI 75-97), and accuracy of 71% for detecting LVEF <50%. MAPSE demonstrated lower sensitivity than EPSS (79% sensitivity [95% CI 58-93], and 76% specificity [95% CI 59-88]) and higher specificity than estimated LVEF (100% sensitivity [95% CI 86-100], 59% specificity [95% CI 42-75]). PPV and NPV for MAPSE was 71% (95% CI 47-88) and 70% (95% CI 62-77) respectively. The ROC for MAPSE <8 mm is 0.79 (95% CI 0.68-0.9). MAPSE measurement interrater reliability was 96%. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study evaluating MAPSE measurements by EPs, we found the measurement was easy to perform with excellent agreement across users with minimal training. A MAPSE value <8 mm had moderate predictive value for LVEF <50% on CE and was more specific for reduced LVEF than qualitative assessment. MAPSE had high specificity for LVEF <50%. Further studies are needed to validate these results on a larger scale.

Sorrow on the Shoreline.

This essay describes 3 health care workers who unexpectedly encounter a patient in need.

Association of hypoxic ischemic brain injury on early CT after out of hospital cardiac arrest with neurologic outcome.

AIM: This study aimed to describe the prevalence of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) on head CT (HCT) obtained within two hours of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) care in the Emergency Department following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and evaluate the association between early HIBI and neurologic outcome. METHODS: Retrospective single center observational study of post-OHCA patients between 2009 and 2017. Two cohorts were analyzed: those who underwent non-contrast HCT within two hours of ROSC and all others who survived to ICU admission. HIBI was defined as the presence of cerebral edema and/or abnormal gray-white matter differentiation in the HCT interpretation by a neuroradiologist. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of HIBI on early HCT and the magnitude of the association between HIBI and survival with good neurologic outcome using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Following OHCA, 333 of 520 patients (64%) underwent HCT within two hours of ROSC and HIBI was present in 96 of 333 patients (29%). Of the early HCT cohort, those with HIBI had a significantly lower hospital survival (2%) and favorable neurologic outcome (1%). In those without HIBI on imaging, 88 of 237 patients (37%) had a favorable outcome. After adjustment for confounding variables, HIBI on early HCT was independently associated with a decreased likelihood of good neurologic outcome (aOR 0.015, 95% CI 0.002-0.12). CONCLUSION: HIBI was present on 29% of HCTs obtained within 2 h of ROSC in the patients selected for early imaging by emergency physicians and was strongly and inversely associated with survival with a good neurologic outcome.

Respiratory Variation in Carotid Artery Peak Systolic Velocity Is Unable to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Patients When Assessed by Novice Physician Sonologists.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory variation in carotid artery peak systolic velocity (ΔVpeak) assessed by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been proposed as a noninvasive means to predict fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the ability of carotid ΔVpeak as assessed by novice physician sonologists to predict fluid responsiveness. METHODS: This study was conducted in 2 intensive care units. Spontaneously breathing, nonintubated patients with signs of volume depletion were included. Patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter, cardiogenic, obstructive or neurogenic shock, or those for whom further intravenous (IV) fluid administration would be harmful were excluded. Three novice physician sonologists were trained in POCUS assessment of carotid ΔVpeak. They assessed the carotid ΔVpeak in study participants prior to the administration of a 500 mL IV fluid bolus. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in cardiac index as measured using bioreactance. RESULTS: Eighty-six participants were enrolled, 50 (58.1%) were fluid responders. Carotid ΔVpeak performed poorly at predicting fluid responsiveness. Test characteristics for the optimum carotid ΔVpeak of 8.0% were: area under the receiver operating curve = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.48-0.73), sensitivity = 72.0% (95% CI: 58.3-82.56), specificity = 50.0% (95% CI: 34.5-65.5). CONCLUSIONS: Novice physician sonologists using POCUS are unable to predict fluid responsiveness using carotid ΔVpeak. Until further research identifies key limiting factors, clinicians should use caution directing IV fluid resuscitation using carotid ΔVpeak.

Change in Carotid Blood Flow and Carotid Corrected Flow Time Assessed by Novice Sonologists Fails to Determine Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Measurement of carotid blood flow (CBF) and corrected carotid flow time (ccFT) has been proposed as a non-invasive means of determining fluid responsiveness. We evaluated the ability of CBF and ccFT as assessed by novice sonologists to determine fluid responsiveness in intensive care unit patients. Three novice physician sonologists performed carotid ultrasounds before and after a fluid bolus and calculated changes in CBF and ccFT. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in cardiac index as measured using bioreactance. Of 112 participants, 56 (50%) were fluid responders. Changes in CBF and ccFT performed poorly at determining fluid responsiveness: 19 mL/min (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.68) and 6 ms (0.59, 0.46-0.65) respectively. Novice physician sonologists are unable to determine fluid responsiveness using CBF or ccFT. Further research is needed to identify the key limiting factors in using carotid ultrasound to determine fluid responsiveness.

Performance of a 25% Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility in Detecting Fluid Responsiveness When Assessed by Novice Versus Expert Physician Sonologists.

OBJECTIVES: Inferior vena cava collapsibility (cIVC) measured by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been proposed as a noninvasive means of assessing fluid responsiveness. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the performance of a 25% cIVC cutoff value to detect fluid responsiveness among spontaneously breathing intensive care unit (ICU) patients when assessed with POCUS by novice versus expert physician sonologists. METHODS: Prospective observational study of spontaneously breathing ICU patients. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a >10% increase in cardiac index following a 500 mL fluid bolus, measured by bioreactance. Novice sonologist measured cIVC with POCUS. Their measurements were later compared to an expert physician sonologist who independently reviewed the POCUS images and assessed cIVCs. RESULTS: Of the 85 participants, 44 (52%) were fluid responders. A 25% cIVC cutoff value performed better when assessed by expert sonologists than novice physician sonologists (receiver-operator characteristic curve, ROC = 0.82 [0.74-0.88] vs ROC = 0.69 [0.60-0.77]). CONCLUSIONS: A 25% cIVC cutoff value measured by POCUS detects fluid responsiveness. However, the experience of the physician sonologist affects test performance and should be considered when interpreting and clinically using cIVC to direct intravenous fluid resuscitation.

Increased Sensitivity of Focused Cardiac Ultrasound for Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Department Patients With Abnormal Vital Signs.

BACKGROUND: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) is insensitive for pulmonary embolism (PE). Theoretically, when a clot is large enough to cause vital sign abnormalities, it is more likely to show signs of right ventricular dysfunction on FOCUS, although this has not been well quantified. A rapid bedside test that could quickly and reliably exclude PE in patients with abnormal vital signs could be of high utility in emergency department (ED) patients. We hypothesized that in patients with tachycardia or hypotension, the sensitivity of FOCUS for PE would increase substantially. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational multicenter cohort study involving a convenience sample of patients from six urban academic EDs. Patients suspected to have PE with tachycardia (heart rate [HR] ≥ 100 beats/min) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure [sBP] < 90 mm Hg) underwent FOCUS before computed tomography angiography (CTA). FOCUS included assessment for right ventricular dilation, McConnell's sign, septal flattening, tricuspid regurgitation, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. If any of these were abnormal, FOCUS was considered positive, while if all were normal, FOCUS was considered negative. We a priori planned a subgroup analysis of all patients with a HR ≥ 110 beats/min (regardless of their sBP). We then determined the diagnostic test characteristics of FOCUS for PE in the entire patient population and in the predefined subgroup, based on CTA as the criterion standard. Inter-rater reliability of FOCUS was determined by blinded review of images by an emergency physician with fellowship training in ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 143 subjects were assessed for enrollment and 136 were enrolled; four were excluded because they were non-English-speaking and three because of inability to obtain any FOCUS windows. The mean (±SD) age of enrolled subjects was 56 (±7) years, mean (±SD) HR was 114 (±12) beats/min, and 37 (27.2%) subjects were diagnosed with PE on CTA. In all subjects, FOCUS was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 78% to 98%) sensitive and 64% specific (95% CI = 53% to 73%) for PE. In the subgroup of 98 subjects with a HR ≥ 110 beats/min, FOCUS was 100% sensitive (95% CI = 88% to 100%) and 63% specific (95% CI = 51% to 74%) for PE. There was substantial interobserver agreement for FOCUS (κ = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.31 to 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: A negative FOCUS examination may significantly lower the likelihood of the diagnosis of PE in most patients who are suspected of PE and have abnormal vital signs. This was especially true in those patients with a HR ≥ 110 beats/min. Our results suggest that FOCUS can be an important tool in the initial evaluation of ED patients with suspected PE and abnormal vital signs.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Procedural Amnesia and Respiratory Depression Between Moderate and Deep Sedation With Propofol in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine if there is a difference in procedural amnesia and adverse respiratory events (AREs) between the target sedation levels of moderate (MS) and deep (DS) procedural sedation. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial of consenting adult patients planning to undergo DS with propofol between March 5, 2015, and May 24, 2017. Patients were randomized to a target sedation level of MS or DS using the American Society of Anesthesiologist's definitions. Drug doses, vital signs, observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAAS) score, end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2 ), and the need for supportive airway maneuvers (SAMs; bag-valve mask use, repositioning, and stimulation to induce respirations) were monitored continuously. A standardized image was shown every 30 seconds starting 3 minutes before the procedure continuing until the patient had returned to baseline after the procedure. Recall and recognition of images were assessed 10 minutes after the sedation. Subclinical respiratory depression (RD) was defined as SaO2 ≤ 91%, change in ETCO2 ≥ 10 mm Hg, or absent ETCO2 at any time. The occurrence of RD with a SAM was defined as an ARE. Patient satisfaction, pain, and perceived recollection and physician assessment of procedure difficulty were collected using visual analog scales (VASs). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled: 54 randomized to target MS and 53 to DS. Of the patients randomized to target MS, 50% achieved MS and 50% achieved DS. In the target DS group, 77% achieved DS and 23% achieved MS. The median total propofol dose (mg/kg) was lower in the MS group: MS 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-1.6, IQR = 1) versus DS 1.8 (95% CI = 1.6-2.0, IQR = 0.9). There were no differences in median OAAS during the procedure (MS 2.4 and DS 2.8), lowest OAAS (MS 2 and DS 2), percentage of images recalled (MS 4.7% vs. DS 3.8%, p = 0.73), or percentage of images recognized (MS 61.1% vs. DS 55%, p = 0.52). In the MS group, 41% patients had any AREs compared to 42% in the DS group (p = 0.77, 95% CI difference = -0.12 to 0.24). The total number of AREs was 23% lower in the MS group (p = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.41 to -0.04). There was no difference in patient-reported pain, satisfaction, or recollection VAS scores. Provider's rating of procedural difficulty and procedural success were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting MS or DS did not reliably result in the intended sedation level. Targeting MS, however, resulted in a lower rate of total AREs and fewer patients had multiple AREs with no difference in procedural recall. As seen in previous reports, patients who achieved MS had less AREs than those who achieved DS. Our study suggests that a target of MS provides adequate amnesia with less need for supportive airway interventions than a target level of DS, despite the fact that it often does not result in intended sedation level.

The occurrence of aspiration pneumonia after emergency endotracheal intubation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Adverse events, including aspiration, occur during Emergency Department (ED) intubation, but their contemporary incidence is not well described. We sought to estimate the rate of aspiration pneumonia potentially related to emergency intubation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of adult patients who were endotracheally intubated in the ED. Using a standard definition, we determined the proportion of patients who developed aspiration pneumonia after intubation. Aspiration pneumonia was defined as any of the following in patients without a diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia, healthcare-associated pneumonia, or aspiration prior to intubation: pathogenic growth in sputum culture, unexplained hypoxemia, or radiographic evidence of pneumonia in the first 48h after intubation. Baseline characteristics and intubation details were compared for those with and without aspiration pneumonia. RESULTS: 879 patients were enrolled over a 30-month period. Intubation was facilitated by video laryngoscopy (49%), direct laryngoscopy (45%), nasal intubation (4%), a intubating laryngeal mask airway (1%), and a surgical airway (0.1%). 85% were intubated on the first attempt, 12% on the second, 3% on the third or more attempts. 25% of patients experienced an oxygen saturation <90% during the intubation. After excluding patients not eligible for the outcome assessment (those who died within 48h without findings of pneumonia), 66/823 (8%) developed aspiration pneumonia potentially related to ED intubation. In comparing those with and without aspiration pneumonia, there were no differences between first intubation attempt parameters and the occurrence of aspiration pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Aspiration pneumonia occurred commonly in this cohort. Although we did not identify any intubation factors that differed between those with and without with aspiration pneumonia, these findings should remind emergency physicians that emergency endotracheal intubation remains a high-risk procedure, and all care should be taken to minimize the risk of peri-intubation complications.

Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy Using the C-MAC for Tracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department, a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) has long been the most common approach for emergency endotracheal intubation, although the use of video laryngoscopy (VL) is becoming more widespread. Current observational data suggest that VL has higher first-pass success, although randomized trials are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to compare first-pass success in patients undergoing emergency intubation with DL or VL using a C-MAC device. METHODS: This was an open-label, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in an academic emergency department of patients undergoing emergency intubation with a plan of DL for the first attempt. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either DL or VL using a C-MAC device for the first intubation attempt. The primary outcome was first-pass success. Secondary outcomes included time to intubation, development of aspiration pneumonia, and hospital length of stay (LOS). The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01710891. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were enrolled and intubated with either DL (n = 95) or VL (n = 103). First-attempt success was 86 and 92% for the DL and VL groups, respectively (difference = -5.9%, 95% confidence interval = -14.5% to 2.7%, p = 0.18). Time to intubation, rates of aspiration pneumonia, and hospital LOS were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing emergency intubation in whom DL was planned for the first attempt, we did not detect a difference between VL or DL using the C-MAC device in first-pass success, duration of intubation attempt, aspiration pneumonia, or hospital LOS.

Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy for Tissue Oxygenation Monitoring During Procedural Sedation: The Occurrence of Peripheral Tissue Oxygenation Changes With Respiratory Depression and Supportive Airway Measures.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess whether respiratory depression and supportive airway measures occurring during procedural sedation are associated with changes in peripheral tissue oxygen saturation (StO2 ). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of adult patients undergoing procedural sedation in the emergency department (ED). Patients undergoing sedation with propofol, 1:1 propofol and ketamine, and 4:1 propofol and ketamine were included. Clinical interventions, sedative medication doses, vital signs, end-tidal capnography (ETCO2 ), pulse oximetry (SpO2 ), and peripheral tissue oxygen saturation (StO2 ) were recorded. Respiratory depression was defined as the occurrence of a recorded SpO2  < 92%, an increase in ETCO2  > 10 mm Hg from baseline, or loss of capnography waveform. Supportive airway measures documented during the procedure included bag-valve mask ventilation, airway repositioning maneuvers, increase in supplemental oxygen, and stimulation to induce respiration. Relative changes in StO2 between baseline and nadir were compared among patients who met respiratory depression criteria or required a supportive airway measure and those who did not. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were enrolled. Thirty-two patients (34.4%) met criteria for respiratory depression, and 31 (33.3%) required intervention in the form of a supportive airway measure. The median percent change in StO2 from procedure baseline to nadir in patients meeting criteria for respiratory depression was 13.6%, compared to 4.2% in those who did not. The change in StO2 in patients who required a supportive airway measure was 12.5% versus 5.4% in those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with respiratory depression and the use of supportive airway measures had greater changes in StO2 during procedural sedation than in patients who did not. Peripheral tissue oxygen saturation monitoring may be a useful tool for assessing respiratory adverse events in patients undergoing procedural sedation in the ED.