Application of biorelevant in vitro assays for the assessment and optimization of ASD-based formulations for pediatric patients.

Amorphous solid dispersions (ASD) have been a successful formulation strategy to overcome the poor aqueous solubility of many novel drugs, but the development of pediatric formulations presents a special challenge due to variable gastrointestinal conditions in children. It was the aim of this work to design and apply a staged biopharmaceutical test protocol for the in vitro assessment of ASD-based pediatric formulations. Ritonavir was used as a model drug with poor aqueous solubility. Based on the commercial ASD powder formulation, a mini-tablet and a conventional tablet formulation were prepared. Drug release from the three formulations was studied in different biorelevant in vitro assays (i.e. MicroDiss, two-stage, transfer model, tiny-TIM) to consider different aspects of human GI physiology. Data from the two-stage and transfer model tests indicated that by controlled disintegration and dissolution excessive primary precipitation can be prevented. However, this advantage of the mini-tablet and tablet formulation did not translate into better performance in tiny-TIM. Here, the in vitro bioaccessibility was comparable for all three formulations. In the future, the staged biopharmaceutical action plan established herein will support the development of ASD-based pediatric formulations by improving the mechanistic understanding so that formulations are developed for which drug release is robust against variable physiological conditions.

Swallowing Tablets and Capsules Increases the Risk of Penetration and Aspiration in Patients with Stroke-Induced Dysphagia.

We evaluated the prevalence of difficulties swallowing solid dosage forms in patients with stroke-induced dysphagia and whether swallowing tablets/capsules increases their risk of penetration and aspiration. Concurrently, we explored whether routinely performed assessment tests help identify patients at risk. Using video endoscopy, we evaluated how 52 patients swallowed four different placebos (round, oval, and oblong tablets and a capsule) with texture-modified water (TMW, pudding consistency) and milk and rated their swallowing performance according to the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS). Additionally, Daniels Test, Bogenhausener Dysphagiescore, Scandinavian Stroke Scale, Barthel Index, and Tinetti's Mobility Test were conducted. A substantial proportion of the patients experienced severe difficulties swallowing solid oral dosage forms (TMW: 40.4 %, milk: 43.5 %). Compared to the administration of TMW/milk alone, the placebos increased the PAS values in the majority of the patients (TMW: median PAS from 1.5 to 2.0; milk: median PAS from 1.5 to 2.5, each p value <0.0001) and residue values were significantly higher (p < 0.05). Whereas video-endoscopic examination reliably identified patients with difficulties swallowing medication, neither patients' self-evaluation nor one of the routinely performed bedside tests did. Therefore, before video-endoscopic evaluation, many drugs were modified unnecessarily and 20.8 % of these were crushed inadequately, although switching to another dosage form or drug would have been possible. Hence, safety and effectiveness of swallowing tablets and capsules should be evaluated routinely in video-endoscopic examinations, tablets/capsules should rather be provided with TMW than with milk, and the appropriateness of "non per os except medication" orders for dysphagic stroke patients should be questioned.

Two techniques to make swallowing pills easier.

To evaluate whether 2 techniques (the pop-bottle method for tablets and the lean-forward technique for capsules) ease swallowing of tablets and capsules, we conducted a cross-sectional study including 151 adults of the general German population. Participants swallowed 16 differently shaped placebos, rated their ease of swallowing on an 8-point Likert scale, and swallowed the 2 dosage forms that they had rated most difficult again using the appropriate technique. The pop-bottle method substantially improved swallowing of tablets in 59.7% (169/283) and the lean-forward technique for capsules in 88.6% (31/35). Both techniques were remarkably effective in participants with and without reported difficulties swallowing pills and should be recommended regularly.

Safeguarding the process of drug administration with an emphasis on electronic support tools.

AIMS: The aim of this work is to understand the process of drug administration and identify points in the workflow that resulted in interventions by clinical information systems in order to improve patient safety. METHODS: To identify a generic way to structure the drug administration process we performed peer-group discussions and supplemented these discussions with a literature search for studies reporting errors in drug administration and strategies for their prevention. RESULTS: We concluded that the drug administration process might consist of up to 11 sub-steps, which can be grouped into the four sub-processes of preparation, personalization, application and follow-up. Errors in drug handling and administration are diverse and frequent and in many cases not caused by the patient him/herself, but by family members or nurses. Accordingly, different prevention strategies have been set in place with relatively few approaches involving e-health technology. CONCLUSIONS: A generic structuring of the administration process and particular error-prone sub-steps may facilitate the allocation of prevention strategies and help to identify research gaps.

Difficulties swallowing solid oral dosage forms in a general practice population: prevalence, causes, and relationship to dosage forms.

PURPOSE: We assessed the prevalence of difficulties in swallowing solid oral dosage forms in a general practice population. Reasons, nature, and characteristics of tablets and capsules causing such difficulties were investigated as well as general practitioners' (GP) awareness of these difficulties. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted in 11 general practices and consecutive patients taking at least one solid oral dosage form for ≥4 weeks were invited to respond to a questionnaire at the practices and one at home. Physicians completed a short questionnaire for each included patient. RESULTS: Of all participants (N = 1,051), 37.4 % reported having had difficulties in swallowing tablets and capsules. The majority (70.4 %) of these patients was not identified by their GP. The occurrence of swallowing difficulties was related to gender (f>m), age (young>old), dysphagia [adjusted odds ratio (adOR): 7.9; p < 0.0001] and mental illness (adOR: 1.8; p < 0.05). By asking "Do you choke while eating or drinking?", affected patients could be identified with a sensitivity of 62.6 % and a specificity of 78.1 %. Because of these difficulties, 58.8 % of the affected patients had already modified their drugs in a way that may alter safety and efficacy and 9.4 % indicated to be non-adherent. CONCLUSIONS: One in 11 primary care patients had frequent difficulties in swallowing tablets and capsules while GPs grossly underestimated these problems. Therefore, physicians should rule out swallowing difficulties regularly to avoid non-adherence and inappropriate drug modifications. Special attention should be paid to specific patient groups (e.g. women and patients with dysphagia, dysphagia indicators, or mental illness).