Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Dermatol ; 13(3): 288-93, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12804992

RESUMO

Clear proceedings in detection of malignant melanoma and monitoring of melanocytic nevi (MN) have been achieved by dermoscopy in recent years: sensitivity to 95% is possible for experts. Does patients' confidence in methods for detection of malignant melanoma most important for adherence in follow-up reflect this diagnostic power? A self-administered survey was performed in 210 consecutive patients at 13 private dermatological practices and the department of Dermatology of the University of Regensburg. Confidence was assessed by a 5-step ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 5 (higher values indicate higher confidence) and willingness-to-pay (wtp) as health-economic instrument for naked-eye inspection (NEI), handheld dermoscopy (HHD), digital dermoscopy (DD), and teledermoscopy (TD); additional, wtp for a hypothetical method promising 100% accuracy. Data of 143 patients (response rate 69.5%; mean age 37 years, 58% female) could be analysed. Mean confidence was 1.9 0.9 for NEI, 2.8 0.9 for HHD, 4.5 0.7 for DD, and 4.7 0.5 for TD. Mean wtp per examination was 0.64% 1.1 of monthly income for NEI, 1.1% 1.9 for HHD, 2.8% 3.3 for DD, 3.1% 4.6 for TD, and 5.0% 7.8 for hypothetical method. Differences between methods were statistically significant. Compared to the hypothetical method, NEI achieved only 14.9%, HHD 24.8%, DD 58.4%, and TD 60% of maximum confidence. This study was performed without any influence on routine information for patients. Results therefore represent patients' actual knowledge of dermoscopical methods in daily dermatological practices. Patients' confidence was highest for TD, HHD was clearly underestimated. Willingness-to-pay in HHD, DD, and TD was at least 40% below a hypothetical method promising 100% accuracy. Better information about diagnostic accuracy of methods available is necessary to increase patients' knowledge and confidence.


Assuntos
Dermatologia/métodos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Microscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Exame Físico/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Dermatologia/economia , Dermatologia/normas , Feminino , Financiamento Pessoal , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Microscopia/economia , Microscopia/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Físico/economia , Exame Físico/normas , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 48(5): 679-93, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12734496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a need for better standardization of the dermoscopic terminology in assessing pigmented skin lesions. OBJECTIVE: The virtual Consensus Net Meeting on Dermoscopy was organized to investigate reproducibility and validity of the various features and diagnostic algorithms. METHODS: Dermoscopic images of 108 lesions were evaluated via the Internet by 40 experienced dermoscopists using a 2-step diagnostic procedure. The first-step algorithm distinguished melanocytic versus nonmelanocytic lesions. The second step in the diagnostic procedure used 4 algorithms (pattern analysis, ABCD rule, Menzies method, and 7-point checklist) to distinguish melanoma versus benign melanocytic lesions. kappa Values, log odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratios were estimated for all diagnostic algorithms and dermoscopic features. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was fair to good for all diagnostic methods, but it was poor for the majority of dermoscopic criteria. Intraobserver agreement was good to excellent for all algorithms and features considered. Pattern analysis allowed the best diagnostic performance (positive likelihood ratio: 5.1), whereas alternative algorithms revealed comparable sensitivity but less specificity. Interobserver agreement on management decisions made by dermoscopy was fairly good (mean kappa value: 0.53). CONCLUSION: The virtual Consensus Net Meeting on Dermoscopy represents a valid tool for better standardization of the dermoscopic terminology and, moreover, opens up a new territory for diagnosing and managing pigmented skin lesions.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Internet , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/patologia , Microscopia/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Pigmentação da Pele , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Melanoma/classificação , Microscopia/normas , Fotografação , Valores de Referência , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/classificação , Terminologia como Assunto
3.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 21(3): 159-79, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12558467

RESUMO

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease with increasing prevalence and rising costs. Stigmatisation and pruritus are only some aspects of potential quality-of-life (QOL) impairments. AD is not curable and repeated treatments are often necessary. At present, treatment with topically-applied corticosteroids is state-of-the-art for mild to moderate flare-ups. However, many patients are worried about the use of corticosteroids due to the widespread fear of adverse effects. In this review the present literature is analysed concerning impact on quality of life for topically-applicable alternatives to the state-of-the-art treatment. For comparison reasons, data from other treatment modalities are additionally given. Characteristics of studies were analysed using 'general' (year and mode of publication, type and aim of study, number of patients, and clinical measurement) and 'QOL specific' criteria (type and number of QOL measurements including relevance for study aim and age group, validation in used language, sensitivity to change, and improvement at end of study). QOL data are published only in the minority of studies evaluating treatment efficacy and do not cover the variety of possible therapies. Data are available for tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, UVA/UVB combination and UVB narrowband (topical non-corticosteroidal treatments), as well as for topical corticosteroids, cyclosporin, and inpatient treatment. All studies provided a marked improvement in quality of life after therapy. One study assessed quality of life after a treatment-free follow-up period obtaining a clear increase in impact on quality of life. Since studies used different QOL measurements and vary in inclusion criteria, treatment schedules and presentation of results, a comparison of QOL improvement is not recommended. A single randomised study compared topically applied non-corticosteroidal treatment (UVA/UVB combination) with another treatment modality (cyclosporin) and found no difference in QOL improvement. At present, there is a clear lack of controlled randomised studies evaluating different active treatment modalities and their impact on quality of life. Consensus meetings are desirable to formulate guidelines for the selection and correct use of QOL measurements. Patients' fear of side effects (e.g. concerning corticosteroids) should be integrated in QOL questionnaires for evaluation of possible compliance problems and real costs. Since relapse after treatment is frequent in AD, QOL measurements should also be performed after a treatment-free follow-up period. At present, we can not answer the question 'which treatment best improves quality of life in AD?'.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Administração Tópica , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Balneologia , Criança , Dermatite Atópica/classificação , Dermatite Atópica/fisiopatologia , Farmacoeconomia , Humanos , Terapia PUVA , Fototerapia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
4.
Eur J Dermatol ; 12(6): 543-8, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12459524

RESUMO

Safety and efficacy of this new treatment modality for out-patients were evaluated by an uncontrolled multicenter trial under GCP-conditions. Patients had to undergo 3-5 treatment sessions per week up to 35 in total. SCORAD (SC) was assessed at baseline, after 20 and 35 sessions. For patients with early study withdrawal the last-observation-carry-forward-principle was used. 615 intention-to-treat (itt)- (baseline SC: 59.4) and 143 according-to-protocol (atp)-patients (baseline SC: 60.1) could be analysed. 289 patients (47%) (baseline SC: 59.1) underwent less than 35 sessions. Main reasons were: lack of time (16%), non-compliance (12%), good improvement (7%), lack of efficacy (6%), intercurrent disease (4%) and side effects (3%). Mean number of sessions in atp-group was 35, in itt 26, and in patients with early study withdrawal 15.8. SC decreased in atp-group to 37.5 (itt: 44.5/patients with early study withdrawal: 46.1) after 20 sessions and to 27.1 (35.2/42.6) at end of treatment. Relative SC-improvement was statistically significant in atp- (55%), itt-group (41%), and in patients with early study withdrawal (26%). Most frequent side effects were: erythema in 7.3%, burning of skin due to salt solution in 3.6%. Safety and efficacy could be proven in both atp- and itt-group. A marked difference in efficacy between atp and itt underlines the importance of evaluating itt-data providing a more realistic assessment of a treatment modality in practice. This treatment is especially recommended for patients with chronic type of AD, high compliance and time free for therapy.


Assuntos
Balneologia/métodos , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Terapia Ultravioleta/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial , Terapia Combinada , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Cooperação do Paciente , Seleção de Pacientes , Sais/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...