[Ensuring Future Primary Care from a Municipal Perspective]. / Die zukünftige Sicherstellung der hausärztlichen Versorgung aus kommunaler Perspektive.

BACKGROUND: In view of the continuing shortage of general practitioners, ensuring access to (primary) medical care close to home is also becoming increasingly important for local authorities. The aim of the present study was to analyse the current and future provision of primary care from the viewpoint of the municipalities in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). From the results, it should be possible to derive future health policy design of a needs-based primary care close to home. METHODS: In an online survey in spring 2023, we surveyed the mayors or representatives of health departments of all 427 municipalities (396 cities and communities, 31 districts) in NRW in cooperation with the NRW Association of Cities and Municipalities, the NRW Association of Counties and the NRW Association of Cities. The items of the questionnaire (n=28) were developed on the basis of two other surveys on medical care in Lower Saxony and Baden-Württemberg, each with a municipal policy target group. They were tested in repeated pretests. RESULTS: In total, 192 municipalities participated in the survey (response rate: 45.0%). The majority of the municipalities (86.6%) considered the local provision of primary care to be (rather) not ensured within the next 10 years. The municipalities expressed the wish for more opportunities to exert their own influence (79.5% yes or rather yes), but nevertheless considered a stronger commitment, especially of the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (85.4%), as well as an intensification of assumption of responsibility by the federal states (72.4%) to be necessary for ensuring primary care. CONCLUSION: The survey shows that municipalities are quite aware of the problem of future deficits in the supply of general practitioners at the local level. The results also indicate that, in view of increasing supply shortfalls, the municipalities see obligations for the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians and the federal states to take responsibility and to exert greater political pressure in the future. The municipal perspective is an essential building block in considerations of how primary care can be ensured in the future. The responsible stakeholders should therefore involve the municipal level in the planning and measures to secure primary care more closely than in the past.

[Primary Care Inequalities to the Disadvantage of the Population of Socially Deprived Urban Areas: A Case Study of Essen, Germany]. / Primärärztliche Versorgungsungleichheiten zu Ungunsten der Bevölkerung sozial benachteiligter Stadtgebiete ­ eine Fallanalyse am Beispiel der Stadt Essen.

Background As a large city in the middle of a metropolitan area, the city of Essen is characterized by strong social segregation and a north-south divide in the social status of its population. The conventional demand planning does not take such strong disparities within a planning unit into account. The present study aims to analyze the distribution of primary care structures using the example of two large urban areas within the city of Essen and to identify perspectives for strengthening primary care in disadvantaged urban areas. Methods First, a secondary data analysis was carried out at the district level and the study area Essen North (258,790 residents), consisting of 19 districts, was defined on the basis of two inclusion criteria - 1. location of the district north of the A40 freeway and 2. a mean subsistence rate>17.20 percent (average value of the city of Essen). Subsequently the study area was compared with the rest of the city (332,242 residents) with regard to the indicators a) social status, and b) available general practioners and pediatricians. The data of the selected indicators is based on the social reporting of the city of Essen and the "Online Practice Search" (Online-Praxissuche) of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians North Rhine. The resulting database (last update: 10/20212) was then evaluated at the district level and the primary care situation of the two urban areas was compared. Results The results revealed a significantly lower primary care coverage in the socially disadvantaged study area Essen North by about 25 percent for general practioners and by almost half for pediatricians. Thus, higher social disadvantage was associated with poorer access to primary care close to home, especially for children and adolescents. Conclusion The distribution of primary care providers in the city of Essen increases the risk of contributing to the manifestation of geographic disparities and health inequalities. The existing planning system in particular is not suitable for addressing the threatening or already existing undersupply of primary health care to the population in disadvantaged urban districts.

[Physician assistants as a future model in primary care: Experiences, needs, potentials and barriers]. / Physician Assistants als Zukunftsmodell in der hausärztlichen Versorgung ­ Erfahrungen, Bedarfe, Potenziale und Hürden.

INTRODUCTION: In the coming decades, demographic change will dramatically increase health care needs, especially for general practitioners (GPs). However, there is a shortage of young primary care physicians, with signs of (impending) underuse already becoming apparent in rural and structurally weak areas. Innovative care concepts are needed to counteract this development and ensure the future of primary care. In addition to medical assistants (MFA), academically trained physician assistants (PAs) could be considered for more demanding delegation tasks and be involved in direct patient care under the responsibility of a physician in the practice team. In England, the Netherlands and the USA, PAs have been a part of the health care systems for many years. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: 1) What are the potentials for delegation/possibilities for PAs working in primary care practices in contrast to medical assistants? 2) What structural requirements are necessary to regularly integrate PAs in primary care practices? METHODS: After preliminary interviews with PA experts and primary care researchers and practitioners (n=29), four expert interviews (n=4) with GPs and PAs were performed in a case analysis in order to elicit experiences with PAs in family practice. Based on this, three focus groups were conducted with GPs and practice staff (n=15) to discuss the extent, the need and the willingness to delegate physician services to PAs, as well as existing barriers. After transcription, analyses were performed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. RESULTS: The participants acknowledged the potential to reduce physician workloads and showed a high willingness to delegate tasks. Practical examples suggest that a clearly defined delegation of medical tasks to PAs, e.g. participation in infection consultations, is possible after only a few weeks working in family practices. Thus, the cooperation between GPs, PAs and medical assistants can be successful. Uncertainties exist regarding the legal possibilities and limits of delegation as well as the current and future financial reimbursement of PAs. DISCUSSION: The legal and financial framework for the utilization of PAs in ambulatory care should be reliably clarified as well as transparently communicated so that the considerable potentials of delegating tasks to academically trained staff, e.g. PAs, especially in the GP sector, can be exploited in the future. CONCLUSION: Participation of PAs in the GP team could be key to overcoming the often threatening or already existing under-provision of medical care in structurally weak regions.