RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or intensive chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant diseases is a highly distressing experience. The affected person's resilience is crucial to coping with this challenging experience. Experience with resilience-enhancing interventions in children and young adults during cancer therapy is scarce. The major objective of this work was developing and evaluating an effective psycho-oncological mental training that complements the standard psychosocial care. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized single-center study, a total of 30 patients (12 to 22 years of age) who underwent HSCT or high-dose chemotherapy received either the standard psychosocial care (control group [CG]) or additionally underwent a novel and specifically developed resilience-enhancing 14-session mental training (therapy group [TG]). The patients were observed over an 8-month period and were screened for distress, thyroid, and immune function parameters, as well as generalized anxiety, affect, and sports orientation. RESULTS: Patients of the TG showed significantly greater improvements in all assessed mental aspects, including anxiety, affect, competitiveness, win orientation, goal orientation, self-optimization, self-blocking, and loss of focus, as well as cortisol levels within 8 months, as opposed to patients of the CG (effect size range ξ: 0.74-1.00). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Patients who underwent the mental training displayed less anxiety, better affect, and improved mental performance with less self-blocking. This resulted in improved goal orientation, competitiveness, self-optimization, and focus when compared to the CG patients. However, larger prospective trials are necessary to substantiate these findings.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is highly distressing and potentially traumatizing for pediatric and young adult patients (PYAP). At present, there is little evidence on their individual burdens. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the course of the psychological and somatic distress was investigated on eight observation days (day -8/-12, -5, 0 (day of HSCT), +10, +20, and + 30 before/after HSCT), using the PO-Bado external rating scale and the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL self-assessment questionnaire. Stress-associated blood parameters were determined and correlated with the results of the questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 64 PYAP with a median age of 9.1 years (range 0-26 years) who underwent autologous (n = 20; 31%; autoHSCT) or allogeneic (n = 44; 69%; alloHSCT) HSCT were analyzed. Both were associated with a significant reduction in QOL. The reduction in self-assessed QOL correlated with somatic and psychological distress as assessed by medical staff. While somatic distress was similar in both groups with a maximum around day+10 (alloHSCT 8.9 ± 2.4 vs. autoHSCT 9.1 ± 2.6; p = 0.69), a significantly higher level of psychological distress was seen during alloHSCT (e.g. day0 alloHSCT 5.3 ± 2.6 vs. day0 autoHSCT 3.2 ± 1.0; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum of psychological and somatic distress, as well as the lowest quality of life, ranges between day 0 and + 10 after both allogeneic and autologous pediatric HSCT. While somatic distress is similar during autologous and allogeneic HSCT, the allogeneic group seems to be affected by higher psychological distress. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate this observation.
