Legal perspectives on black box recording devices in the operating environment.

BACKGROUND: A video and medical data recorder in the operating theatre is possible, but concerns over privacy, data use and litigation have limited widespread implementation. The literature on legal considerations and challenges to overcome, and guidelines related to use of data recording in the surgical environment, are presented in this narrative review. METHODS: A review of PubMed and Embase databases and Cochrane Library was undertaken. International jurisprudence on the topic was searched. Practice recommendations and legal perspectives were acquired based on experience with implementation and use of a video and medical data recorder in the operating theatre. RESULTS: After removing duplicates, 116 citations were retrieved and abstracts screened; 31 articles were assessed for eligibility and 20 papers were finally included. According to the European General Data Protection Regulation and US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, researchers are required to make sure that personal data collected from patients and healthcare professionals are used fairly and lawfully, for limited and specifically stated purposes, in an adequate and relevant manner, kept safe and secure, and stored for no longer than is absolutely necessary. Data collected for the sole purpose of healthcare quality improvement are not required to be added to the patient's medical record. CONCLUSION: Transparency on the use and purpose of recorded data should be ensured to both staff and patients. The recorded video data do not need to be used as evidence in court if patient medical records are well maintained. Clear legislation on data responsibility is needed to use the medical recorder optimally for quality improvement initiatives.

ANTECEDENTES: Es posible instalar un sistema de video y grabación de datos médicos en el quirófano, pero su implementación se ha visto limitada por las dudas relativas a la privacidad, uso de datos y aspectos de litigio. Estas dudas deberían superarse, motivo por el que en este trabajo se proponen unas guías sobre el uso de sistemas de registro en el ambiente quirúrgico. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión en las bases de datos Pubmed y Embase y de la Biblioteca Cochrane. Se buscó la jurisprudencia internacional sobre el tema. Se establecieron unas recomendaciones prácticas y de las perspectivas legales adquiridas a través de la experiencia de la implementación y el uso de sistemas de video y registro de datos médicos en el quirófano. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron 116 referencias, de las que una vez eliminadas las duplicadas (n = 5) y revisados los resumenes, 31 artículos cumplían los criterios de eligibilidad. En el estudio final se incluyeron 20 artículos. De acuerdo con la Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (General Data Protection Regulation, GDRP) y la Ley de Transferencia y Responsabilidad de Seguro Médico (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, HIPAA), los investigadores deben asegurar que los datos personales recopilados pertenecientes a los pacientes y profesionales de la salud se utilicen de manera justa y legal, con fines definidos y bien establecidos, de manera adecuada y relevante, y mantenidos a resguardo y almacenados no más tiempo del estrictamente necesario. No es necesario que los datos recopilados con el único propósito de mejorar la calidad de la atención médica se agreguen a la historia clínica del paciente. CONCLUSIÓN: Se debe asegurar por parte del personal sanitario como del paciente, la transparencia tanto en la utilización como en el objetivo de los datos almacenados. Los datos registrados en video no es necesario que sean usados como evidencia en procesos judiciales si la historia clínica de los pacientes cumple los estandares establecidos. Se precisa una legislación clara sobre la responsabilidad de los datos para la utilización óptima de los registros médicos en las iniciativas de mejora de la calidad.

Very Long-Chain Acyl-Coenzyme A Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Perioperative Management in Adult Patients.

Surgery and anesthesia pose a threat to patients with very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD), because prolonged fasting, stress, and pain are known risk factors for the induction of metabolic derangement. The optimal perioperative management in these patients is unknown and the use of volatile agents and agents dissolved in fatty acids has been related to postoperative metabolic complications. However, the occurrence of metabolic derangement is multifactorial and depends, amongst others, on the severity of the mutation and residual enzyme activity. Current guidelines suggest avoiding both volatile anesthetics as well as propofol, which seriously limits the options for providing safe anesthesia. Therefore, we reviewed the available literature on the perioperative management of patients with VLCADD. We concluded that the use of some medications, such as volatile anesthetics, in patients with VLCADD might be wrongfully avoided and could in fact prevent metabolic derangement by the adequate suppression of pain and stress during surgery. We will illustrate this with a case report of an adult VLCADD patient undergoing minor surgery. Besides the use of remifentanil, anesthesia was uneventfully maintained with the use of sevoflurane, a volatile agent, and continuous glucose infusion. The patient was monitored with a continuous glucose meter and creatinine kinase measurements.

Comparing the organisational structure of the preoperative assessment clinic at eight university hospitals.

The preoperative assessment clinic (PAC) has been implemented in most major hospitals. However, there is no uniformity in the way PACs are organised. We compared the organisational structure of the PACs from all eight university hospitals in The Netherlands, looking at the following variables: number of patients visiting the PAC, staffing of the PAC, opening hours, scheduling, and additional preoperative diagnostic testing. The number of patients seen yearly varies from 7.000 to 13.500. In all clinics, the preoperative assessment was performed by anaesthetists and residents. In five PACs, preoperative assessment was also performed by physician assistants or nurse practitioners. Opening hours varied. Consultations are by appointment, 'walk-in', or a combination of these two. In four clinics additional testing is performed at the PAC itself. This study shows that the organisational structure of the PAC at similar university hospitals varies greatly; this can have important implications when designing a benchmarking process.

Paraplegia after thoracotomy under combined general and epidural anesthesia in a child.

A 9-year-old boy underwent a thoracotomy for excision of his right third rib under combined general and epidural anesthesia for a Ewings sarcoma. Postoperatively, he was found to have a complete T2-3 paraplegia. Permanent paraplegia was described as a rare complication of thoracotomy in adults, and very rarely after epidural analgesia in adults and babies. This was the first report in a child.