RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pyomyositis, a bacterial muscle infection, is an important differential diagnosis in children and adolescents with musculoskeletal pain. In contrast to tropical regions, it is rarely recognized in temperate countries, but incidence is increasing and major studies are missing. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included patients <18 years of age hospitalized with pyomyositis in 11 Swiss children's hospitals between January 2010 and December 2022. Cases were identified by ICD-10 code (Myositis; M60-M60.9), and data was extracted from electronic hospital records. RESULTS: Of 331 patients identified, 102 fulfilled the case definition. Patient age at presentation ranged from 2 weeks to 17 years (median 8 years). The majority had no underlying illness and all presented with fever and localized pain. At the respective site of pyomyositis, 100 (98%) had impaired movement and 39 (38%) presented with local swelling. Pelvic (57%) and leg (28%) muscles were mostly affected. Blood or tissue cultures were obtained in 94 (92%) and 59 (57%) patients, respectively. Of those, 55 (58%) blood and 52 (88%) tissue cultures were positive, mainly for Staphylococcus aureus (35 and 19, respectively) and Streptococcus pyogene s (12 and 15, respectively). All patients received antibiotic treatment during hospitalization for a median of 10 days (interquartile range: 7-17), followed by outpatient treatment for a further median of 16 days (interquartile range: 11-22) in 95 (93%) patients. Fifty-nine (57%) patients required surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Pyomyositis is a challenging diagnosis that requires a high level of awareness. Blood and/or tissue cultures revealed S. aureus and S. pyogenes as the predominant causative agents.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The most prevalent infections encountered in neonatal care are healthcare-associated infections. The majority of healthcare-associated infections are considered preventable with evidence-based infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. However, substantial knowledge gaps exist in IPC implementation in neonatal care. Furthermore, the knowledge of factors which facilitate or challenge the uptake and sustainment of IPC programmes in neonatal units is limited. The integration of implementation science approaches in IPC programmes in neonatal care aims to address these problems. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this narrative review was to identify determinants which have been reported to influence the implementation of IPC programmes and best practices in inpatient neonatal care settings. SOURCES: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) in May 2022. Primary study reports published in English, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Danish, Swedish or Norwegian since 2000 were eligible for inclusion. Included studies focused on IPC practices in inpatient neonatal care settings and reported determinants which influenced implementation processes. CONTENT: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to identify and cluster reported determinants to the implementation of IPC practices and programmes in neonatal care. Most studies reported challenges and facilitators at the organizational level as particularly relevant to implementation processes. The commonly reported determinants included staffing levels, work- and caseloads, as well as aspects of organizational culture such as communication and leadership. IMPLICATIONS: The presented knowledge about factors influencing neonatal IPC can support the design, implementation, and evaluation of IPC practices.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The extent to which drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antiretrovirals (ARVs) and co-medications are recognized and managed has not been thoroughly evaluated in limited-resource settings. OBJECTIVES: This prospective questionnaire-based study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors for unrecognized/incorrectly managed DDIs in people living with HIV followed-up at the Chronic Diseases Clinic of Ifakara (CDCI) and enrolled in the Kilombero and Ulanga Antiretroviral Cohort (KIULARCO). METHODS: We prospectively included ARV-treated adults receiving ≥1 co-medication coming for a follow-up visit at the CDCI between March and July 2017. Using a structured questionnaire, physicians were requested to identify potentially clinically significant DDIs in the prescribed treatment, to provide recommendations for their management and to indicate any hurdles to implement the recommendations. Prescriptions were subsequently screened for DDIs using the Liverpool DDIs database. Identified clinically significant DDIs and their recommended management according to the DDIs database were compared with the information provided in the questionnaires. RESULTS: Among 334 participants, the median age was 47 years (IQR = 40-56 years), 69% were female and 82% had ≥1 non-communicable disease (NCD). Overall, 129 participants had ≥1 clinically relevant DDI, which was not recognized and/or incorrectly managed in 56 participants (43%). Of those, 6 (11%) were due to limited monitoring options or medication affordability issues. In the multivariable logistic regression, the presence of ≥1 NCD was associated with an increased risk for unrecognized/incorrect DDI management (OR = 15.8; 95% CI = 1.8-139.6). CONCLUSIONS: Recognition/appropriate management of DDIs is suboptimal, highlighting the need for educational programmes, pharmacovigilance activities and increased access to medications and monitoring options. This should become a focus of HIV programmes given the increasing burden of NCDs in sub-Saharan Africa.
