Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have found an association between Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer, many aspects of this relation remain uncertain. METHODS: We prospectively studied 1526 Japanese patients who had duodenal ulcers, gastric ulcers, gastric hyperplasia, or nonulcer dyspepsia at the time of enrollment; 1246 had H. pylori infection and 280 did not. The mean follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 1.0 to 10.6). Patients underwent endoscopy with biopsy at enrollment and then between one and three years after enrollment. H. pylori infection was assessed by histologic examination, serologic testing, and rapid urease tests and was defined by a positive result on any of these tests. RESULTS: Gastric cancers developed in 36 (2.9 percent) of the infected and none of the uninfected patients. There were 23 intestinal-type and 13 diffuse-type cancers. Among the patients with H. pylori infection, those with severe gastric atrophy, corpus-predominant gastritis, and intestinal metaplasia were at significantly higher risk for gastric cancer. We detected gastric cancers in 21 (4.7 percent) of the 445 patients with nonulcer dyspepsia, 10 (3.4 percent) of the 297 with gastric ulcers, 5 (2.2 percent) of the 229 with gastric hyperplastic polyps, and none of the 275 with duodenal ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric cancer develops in persons infected with H. pylori but not in uninfected persons. Those with histologic findings of severe gastric atrophy, corpus-predominant gastritis, or intestinal metaplasia are at increased risk. Persons with H. pylori infection and nonulcer dyspepsia, gastric ulcers, or gastric hyperplastic polyps are also at risk, but those with duodenal ulcers are not.

Review of histological classifications of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: differences in diagnosis of early carcinomas between Japanese and Western pathologists.

Gastrointestinal lesions considered to be high-grade adenoma/dysplasia by Western pathologists using the conventional Western classification are often diagnosed as carcinoma by Japanese pathologists using the Japanese group classification. To overcome these differences, the Padova classification, the Vienna classification, and a revision of the Vienna classification have recently been proposed. The clinical usefulness of these five classifications needs to be reviewed for early gastric, esophageal, and colorectal neoplasias. In 1998, 31 pathologists from 12 countries individually diagnosed the same 35 gastric, 21 esophageal, and 20 colorectal specimens. Their histological diagnoses can be classified conventionally and according to the newly proposed terminology, and from these data, the extent of agreement between pathologists with Western and Japanese viewpoints can be calculated, using kappa statistics. With the conventional Western, Japanese, Padova, Vienna, and revised classifications, the agreement scores were 37%, 37%, 71%, 71%, and 80%, respectively, for gastric lesions; 14%, 14%, 57%, 62%, and 67% for esophageal lesions; and 45%, 50%, 65%, 65%, and 70% for colorectal lesions. The kappa values were lower than 0.3 with the conventional Western and Japanese classifications, but higher than 0.5 for gastric lesions, higher than 0.3 for esophageal lesions, and higher than 0.4 for colorectal lesions with the newly proposed classifications. When the literature regarding treatment indications for early neoplastic lesions is reviewed, it becomes apparent that the categories of the revised classification would fit best with current clinical treatment considerations. This classification would be particularly useful for endoscopically resected specimens, to determine whether additional surgery with lymph node dissection is required. In conclusion, the use of the newly proposed terminology can, in large part, resolve the intercountry differences in the diagnosis of adenoma/dysplasia and early carcinoma. However, the newly proposed classifications should be used with caution for biopsy specimens, as sampling error may result in an underestimation of the neoplastic grade or depth of invasion. For the choice between endoscopic and surgical treatment, assessment of the depth of invasion by endoscopic inspection and ultrasound or radiography is essential.

Diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal carcinomas in Japan and Western countries: proposal for a new classification system of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Large differences have been found between Western and Japanese pathologists in their diagnosis of adenoma/dysplasia and early carcinoma for gastric, colorectal and oesophageal epithelial neoplastic lesions. Common worldwide terminology based on clinical usefulness, that is, on neoplastic severity and depth of invasion, is needed. METHODS: Thirty-one pathologists from 12 countries reviewed 35 gastric, 20 colorectal and 21 oesophageal biopsy and resection specimens. The extent of diagnostic agreement between those with Western and Japanese viewpoints was assessed by kappa statistics. RESULTS: Suspected or definite carcinoma was diagnosed in 17-66% 'of gastric, in 5-40% of colorectal, and in 10-67% of oesophageal slides by pathologists with a Western viewpoint, but in 77-94% of gastric, in 45-75% of colorectal and in 81-100% of oesophageal slides by pathologists with a Japanese viewpoint (from Japan, Germany, Austria and UK). Overall, there was poor agreement between the conventional Western and Japanese diagnoses (kappa values lower than 0.3 for gastric, colorectal and oesophageal lesions). There was much better agreement among the pathologists (kappa values higher than 0.5 for gastric and colorectal lesions) when the original assessments of the slides were regrouped into the five categories of the following classification of GI epithelial neoplasia we hereby propose: C1, negative for neoplasia; C2, indefinite for neoplasia; C3, mucosal low-grade neoplasia (low-grade adenoma/dysplasia); C4, mucosal high-grade neoplasia (high-grade adenoma/dysplasia plus mucosal carcinoma); C5, submucosal invasion of neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: The intercountry differences in the diagnoses of adenoma/dysplasia and early carcinoma can, in large part, be resolved by adopting terminology based on neoplastic severity and depth of invasion. Problems with defining intramucosal invasion are thus avoided. Moreover, grouping high-grade adenoma/dysplasia and mucosal carcinoma together in one category is clinically useful, as patients with small mucosal neoplastic lesions can be cured by endoscopic local resection.

The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Use of the conventional Western and Japanese classification systems of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia results in large differences among pathologists in the diagnosis of oesophageal, gastric, and colorectal neoplastic lesions. AIM: To develop common worldwide terminology for gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. METHODS: Thirty one pathologists from 12 countries reviewed 35 gastric, 20 colorectal, and 21 oesophageal biopsy and resection specimens. The extent of diagnostic agreement between those with Western and Japanese viewpoints was assessed by kappa statistics. The pathologists met in Vienna to discuss the results and to develop a new consensus terminology. RESULTS: The large differences between the conventional Western and Japanese diagnoses were confirmed (percentage of specimens for which there was agreement and kappa values: 37% and 0.16 for gastric; 45% and 0.27 for colorectal; and 14% and 0.01 for oesophageal lesions). There was much better agreement among pathologists (71% and 0.55 for gastric; 65% and 0.47 for colorectal; and 62% and 0.31 for oesophageal lesions) when the original assessments of the specimens were regrouped into the categories of the proposed Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: (1) negative for neoplasia/dysplasia, (2) indefinite for neoplasia/dysplasia, (3) non-invasive low grade neoplasia (low grade adenoma/dysplasia), (4) non-invasive high grade neoplasia (high grade adenoma/dysplasia, non-invasive carcinoma and suspicion of invasive carcinoma), and (5) invasive neoplasia (intramucosal carcinoma, submucosal carcinoma or beyond). CONCLUSION: The differences between Western and Japanese pathologists in the diagnostic classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplastic lesions can be resolved largely by adopting the proposed terminology, which is based on cytological and architectural severity and invasion status.

International comparability of the pathological diagnosis for early cancer of the digestive tract: Munich meeting.

Large differences have been found between Western and Japanese pathologists' diagnosis of adenoma/dysplasia versus early carcinoma for gastric, esophageal. and colorectal epithelial neoplastic lesions. In this study we examined whether differences in experience in gastrointestinal pathology can to some extent explain these differences in diagnostic practice. Three Japanese, one British, and two German pathologists with much experience and one North American pathologist with less experience in routine diagnostic work reviewed 52 microscopic slides: 16 gastric, 24 esophageal, and 12 colorectal biopsy and resection specimens obtained from patients with lesions ranging from early carcinoma to adenoma, dysplasia, and regenerative epithelium. The extent of agreement between the diagnoses of the four individual Western pathologists and the most common Japanese diagnoses was assessed by kappa statistics. For the 16 gastric lesions, a diagnosis of suspected or definite carcinoma was made by the Japanese pathologists in 69%-75% of the slides, by three experienced Western pathologists in 56%-63% (high kappa values: 0.61, 0.64, 0.65), and by the less experienced Western pathologist in only 31% of the slides (low kappa value: 0.10). For the 24 specimens of esophageal squamous lesions, carcinoma in situ and suspected or definite carcinoma were diagnosed by the Japanese in 96%-100% and by the Western pathologists in 63%-88% of the slides (low kappa values: 0.17, 0.25, 0.25, 0.27). For the 12 colorectal lesions, the Japanese diagnosed suspected or definite carcinoma in 58%-83%, whereas all Western pathologists followed the World Health Organization definition of colorectal carcinoma and diagnosed suspected or definite carcinoma in only 0-42% of the slides (kappa values: 0.04, 0.10,0.12, 0.49). In conclusion, there were few differences in diagnoses between experienced Western and Japanese pathologists for gastric lesions but considerable differences for esophageal and colorectal lesions. The differences in the diagnosis of adenoma/dysplasia versus early carcinoma between Western and Japanese pathologists found in previous studies may in large part be attributable to differences in experience with regard to gastric neoplasia and to differences in interpretation and nomenclature with regard to esophageal and colorectal neoplasia.

Differences in diagnostic criteria for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between Japanese and Western pathologists.

BACKGROUND: Large discrepancies have been found between Western and Japanese pathologists in the diagnosis of adenoma/dysplasia versus carcinoma for gastric and colorectal glandular lesions. It is important to determine whether similar differences exist in the diagnosis of esophageal squamous lesions. METHODS: Eleven expert gastrointestinal pathologists from Japan, North America, and Europe individually reviewed a set of microscopic slides containing 21 sections of biopsies and corresponding endoscopic mucosal resection specimens from Japanese patients with superficial esophageal squamous neoplastic lesions. The pathologists indicated the pathologic findings on which they based each diagnosis. RESULTS: Invasion was the most important diagnostic criterion of carcinoma for the Western pathologists whereas nuclear and structural features were more important for the Japanese pathologists. For two sections showing low grade dysplasia according to most Western pathologists, the Japanese pathologists diagnosed suspected carcinoma in one case and definite carcinoma in the other. For nine sections with high grade dysplasia according to the Western pathologists, the Japanese pathologists diagnosed suspected carcinoma in two cases and definite carcinoma in seven cases. For six sections with suspected carcinoma according to most Western pathologists, the Japanese pathologists diagnosed suspected carcinoma in one case and definite carcinoma in five cases. Four sections showed definite carcinoma according to both the Western and Japanese pathologists. Thus, there was agreement among the Western and Japanese pathologists for only 5 of the 21 sections (kappa value, 0.04). However, when high grade dysplasia, noninvasive carcinoma, and suspected carcinoma were grouped together, the agreement was excellent (19 of the 21 sections; kappa value, 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is diagnosed mainly based on nuclear criteria, even in cases judged to be noninvasive low grade dysplasia in the West. This difference in diagnostic practice may contribute to the relatively high incidence rate and good prognosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma in Japan. To improve the comparability of research data, the authors recommend that high grade dysplasia, noninvasive carcinoma, and suspected carcinoma be grouped together into one category of "noninvasive high grade neoplasia." [See editorial on pages 969-70, this issue.]

Phlebosclerotic colitis: value of radiography in diagnosis--report of three cases.

Three cases sharing the following radiologic features are reported: (a) abdominal conventional radiography-vascular calcifications at the right hemicolon, (b) abdominal computed tomography-colonic wall thickening and venous calcifications, and (c) barium enema examination-luminal narrowing of the right hemicolon and thumbprinting. There were no clinical or laboratory findings suggestive of portal hypertension. The disease entity, "phlebosclerotic colitis," should be differentiated from ordinary ischemic colitis.

Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma or dysplasia of the gastric epithelium: rationale for a new classification system.

BACKGROUND: Gastric neoplastic lesions labelled as high-grade adenoma/dysplasia by Western pathologists are often diagnosed as mucosal carcinoma by Japanese pathologists. We examined whether stratifying histological diagnoses by invasion status could increase the extent of agreement between Western and Japanese pathologists and could reduce the frequency of discrepant diagnoses between biopsy samples and corresponding resected specimens. METHODS: Thirty-five histological slides of gastric lesions that had previously been individually reviewed by eight expert gastrointestinal pathologists from Japan, North America and Europe were reassessed by the same pathologists with particular attention to the aspect of invasion. Kappa statistics were used to determine the extent of agreement between Western and Japanese pathologists before and after reclassifying the diagnoses according to invasion status. Moreover, we examined the number of discrepant assessments regarding 14 lesions of which there were both biopsy specimens and resected specimens. RESULTS: There was agreement between the Western and Japanese pathologists in only 11 (31%) of the 35 slides (kappa coefficient 0.15) when traditional diagnostic categories were used. However, after high-grade adenoma/dysplasia, noninvasive carcinoma and suspected carcinoma were grouped together, there was better agreement, namely in 22 (63%) of the slides (kappa coefficient 0.41). Moreover, such reclassification significantly reduced the number of discrepant diagnoses between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens by three Western pathologists, from 19 (45%) of 42 assessments when high-grade adenoma/dysplasia was grouped together with low-grade adenoma/dysplasia, to 6 (14%) of 42 assessments when grouped with suspected and definite carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the international comparability of gastric histological diagnoses we recommend that high-grade adenoma/dysplasia, noninvasive carcinoma and suspicion of invasive carcinoma be grouped together as a single category of noninvasive high-grade epithelial neoplasia.

An activating splice donor mutation in the thrombopoietin gene causes hereditary thrombocythaemia.

Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is a chronic myeloproliferative syndrome due to sustained proliferation of megakaryocytes, which results in elevated numbers of circulating platelets, thrombotic or haemorrhagic episodes and occasional leukaemic transformation. The cause of ET is unknown. Hereditary thrombocythaemia (HT) with autosomal-dominant transmission has been described with manifestations similar to those of sporadic ET. As the thrombopoietin gene (THPO) encodes a lineage-restricted growth factor with profound stimulatory effects on megakaryopoiesis and platelet production, we tested the hypothesis that HT results from a mutation in the human THPO gene. In a Dutch family with eleven affected individuals, the thrombopoietin protein (TPO) concentrations in serum were consistently elevated in individuals with HT. We derived an intragenic CA marker for the human THPO gene and performed linkage analysis in fourteen informative meioses in this family. This resulted in a lod score of 3.5 at theta=0. A G-->C transversion was found in the splice donor site of intron 3 of the THPO gene in all affected family members. This mutation leads to THPO mRNAs with shortened 5'-untranslated regions (UTR) that are more efficiently translated than the normal THPO transcripts. We conclude that a splice donor mutation in THPO leads to systemic overproduction of TPO and causes thrombocythaemia.

Differences in the diagnostic criteria used by Japanese and Western pathologists to diagnose colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In view of the many studies of early stage colorectal carcinoma from Japan, it is essential to know whether the criteria for the histologic diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma are similar in Japan and Western countries. METHODS: Eight expert pathologists from Japan (4), North America (2), and Europe (2) individually reviewed microscope slides of 20 colorectal lesions from Japanese patients who had undergone endoscopic mucosal resection or surgery because early stage carcinoma and/or adenoma was suspected. The pathologists indicated the pathologic findings on which they based each diagnosis. RESULTS: For 11 slides that showed adenoma according to the Western pathologists with low grade dysplasia according to at least half of them, the Japanese diagnosed definite carcinoma with or without adenoma in 4 cases and adenoma in 5, and in 2 cases they were equally divided between a diagnosis of adenoma and carcinoma. For five slides showing adenoma with high grade dysplasia according to the Western pathologists, the Japanese diagnosed definite carcinoma with adenoma in three cases and adenoma in one, and in one case they were equally divided between a diagnosis of adenoma and carcinoma. For one case in which the Western pathologists were equally divided between a diagnosis of carcinoma and adenoma with high grade dysplasia, all the Japanese pathologists diagnosed definite carcinoma with or without adenoma. Three slides showed definite carcinoma with or without adenoma, according to both the Western and the Japanese pathologists. The presence of invasion was the most important diagnostic criterion of colorectal carcinoma for the Western pathologists, whereas for the Japanese the nuclear features and glandular structures were more important. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, colorectal carcinoma is diagnosed on the basis of nuclear and structural criteria, even in cases considered by Western pathologists to be noninvasive lesions with low grade dysplasia. This diagnostic practice may contribute to the relatively high incidence of early stage colorectal carcinoma reported in Japan as compared with Western countries.

Differences in diagnostic criteria for gastric carcinoma between Japanese and western pathologists.

BACKGROUND: There have been many studies on gastric carcinoma in populations with contrasting cancer risks. We aimed to find out whether the criteria for the histological diagnosis of early gastric carcinoma were comparable in Western countries and Japan. METHODS: Eight pathologists from Japan, North America, and Europe individually reviewed 35 microscope slides: 17 gastric biopsy samples and 18 endoscopic mucosal resections taken from 17 Japanese patients with lesions ranging from early gastric cancer to adenoma, dysplasia, and reactive atypia. The pathologists were given a list of pathological criteria and a form on which they were asked to indicate the criteria on which they based each diagnosis. FINDINGS: For seven slides most Western pathologists diagnosed low-grade adenoma/dysplasia, whereas the Japanese diagnosed definite carcinoma in four slides, suspected carcinoma in one, and adenoma in only two. Of 12 slides with high-grade adenoma/dysplasia according to most Western pathologists the Japanese gave the diagnosis of definite carcinoma in 11 and suspected in one. Of six slides showing high-grade adenoma/dysplasia with suspected carcinoma according to most Western pathologists the Japanese diagnosed definite carcinoma in all. There were no major differences in the diagnoses of three slides showing reactive epithelium and seven slides with clearly invasive carcinoma. When the opinion of the majority of the pathologists was taken as the final diagnosis there was agreement between Western and japanese in 11 of the 35 slides (kappa coefficient 0.15 [95% CI 0.01-0.29]). Presence of invasion was the most important diagnostic criterion for most Western pathologists whereas for the Japanese nuclear features and glandular structures were more important. INTERPRETATION: In Japan, gastric carcinoma is diagnosed on nuclear and structural criteria even when invasion is absent according to the Western viewpoint. This diagnostic practice results in almost no discrepancy between the diagnosis of a superficial biopsy sample and that of the final resection specimen. This may also contribute to the relatively high incidence and good prognosis of gastric carcinoma in Japan when compared with Western countries.

Risk factors of peptic ulcer disease: different impact of Helicobacter pylori in Dutch and Japanese populations?

Helicobacter pylori, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, family history, blood group O, hyperpepsinogenaemia A, alcohol and smoking have been reported to be risk factors for peptic ulcer disease. The strength of causal risk factors may differ in different populations. In 215 Japanese and 493 Dutch employees of similar age, gender and type of occupation, a structured history was obtained using a questionnaire and fasting serum samples were analysed for IgG antibodies to H. pylori and pepsinogen A all in the same laboratory. A past ulcer history was verified through case notes. We found that H. pylori seropositivity, a high serum pepsinogen A and a family history of ulcer disease were significant and independent risk factors for peptic ulcer disease. For H. pylori seropositivity there was a 20-fold increased risk among the Dutch and an eight-fold increased risk among the Japanese. The seroprevalence of H. pylori was 90% in 20 Dutch subjects with a verified ulcer history and 95% in 41 Japanese ulcer subjects; it was 29% in Dutch non-ulcer subjects and 70% in Japanese non-ulcer subjects. The cumulative difference in risk to develop peptic ulcer disease at the age of 48 years between H. pylori-infected and -uninfected subjects was 24.5-3.0 = 21.5% for the Japanese and 11.8-0.5 = 11.3% for the Dutch. Duodenal ulcer disease was associated with a high coffee consumption only among the Japanese population, where this habit was much less prevalent than among the Dutch. In conclusion, the characterization of peptic ulcer risk factors as weak or strong has no universal basis: the present study shows that from a diagnostic point of view H. pylori appears to be a weaker risk factor for peptic ulcer disease in a society with a higher seroprevalence. However, from an aetiological point of view, H. pylori has an even greater impact on ulcer morbidity in the Japanese than in the Dutch population.

Recurrent hypoglycaemia caused by the insulin autoimmune syndrome: the first Dutch case.

The insulin autoimmune syndrome is extremely rare outside of Japan. We describe a 45-year-old Caucasian woman who presented with fasting hypoglycaemia and weight gain. The presence of fasting insulin concentrations in excess of 1000 mU/l, very low C-peptide concentrations during hypoglycaemic attacks and high titres of insulin autoantibodies led to the diagnosis. Treatments aimed at decreasing endogenous insulin secretion by either dietary intervention alone or in combination with acarbose, octreotide or diazoxide had only limited success, while a 2-week course of immunosuppression with prednisone was without any antihypoglycaemic effect.

Seroepidemiology of gastritis in Japanese and Dutch male employees with and without ulcer disease.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the state of the gastric mucosa in individuals with and without peptic ulcer disease from populations with contrasting peptic ulcer risks. DESIGN: Pepsinogen A, pepsinogen C, gastrin and Helicobacter pylori antibodies are serological markers of gastritis. A decreasing pepsinogen A-C ratio and pepsinogen A level are known to reflect an increasing severity of corpus atrophy, whereas gastrin levels decrease with an increasing severity of antral atrophy when corpus atrophy is present. Helicobacter pylori-positive men, with and without a peptic ulcer history, were the focus of the study. METHODS: In 190 Japanese and 425 Dutch male employees, of similar age (mean age 49 years) and level of occupation, fasting serum samples were analysed in the same laboratory for IgG antibodies to H. pylori, pepsinogen A, pepsinogen C and gastrin. Any history of ulcer disease was verified through case notes. RESULTS: The H. pylori seropositivity rate was higher in the Japanese men (72%) than in the Dutch (33%). There were 23 (12%) Japanese and 18 (4%) Dutch men with a verified duodenal ulcer history, and 14 (7%) Japanese and two (0.5%) Dutch men with a verified gastric ulcer history. H. pylori-positive men with a duodenal ulcer history differed from the H. pylori-positive men without an ulcer history in that they had a significantly higher mean pepsinogen A level (64 and 51 micrograms/l in Japanese men and 71 and 57 micrograms/l in Dutch men) and also a higher mean pepsinogen A-C ratio, whereas pepsinogen C and gastrin levels did not differ. In H. pylori-positive gastric ulcer patients the mean gastrin level was significantly lower than in H. pylori-positive men without ulcer disease (17 and 37 pmol/l in Japanese men), whereas pepsinogen levels were similar. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that in H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer patients there is less mucosal atrophy of the corpus and in H. pylori-positive gastric ulcer patients more atrophy of the antrum than in H. pylori-positive individuals without peptic ulcer disease.

Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori in Japanese employees with and without ulcer history.

In a Dutch working population, the apparent association between dyspeptic symptoms and Helicobacter pylori infection was found to be entirely due to subjects with an ulcer history. In general populations with a much higher prevalence of H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease, such as in Japan, the relationship between dyspepsia and H. pylori has yet to be clarified. A questionnaire on ulcer history and dyspeptic symptoms during the preceding 3 month period was obtained from apparently healthy Japanese employees who underwent a periodic medical examination. In addition, serum samples were analysed for anti-H. pylori IgG antibodies. A total of 196 men and 35 women, aged 23-71 years, participated in the study. Seven women (20%) and 49 men (25%) had a diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. Among 41 subjects with verified duodenal (26) and/or gastric (17) ulcer, 95% were H. pylori positive while 32% had had frequent dyspeptic symptoms in the 3 months prior to the study (29% of the 35 men and 50% of the 6 women). Among the 147 men and 28 women without an ulcer history, the 3 month period prevalence of frequent dyspepsia was 14 and 32%, respectively. The rate of H. pylori positivity was 80% in non-ulcer dyspeptics and 68% in all other non-ulcer subjects (95% confidence intervals: 61-92 and 61-76%, respectively). Significant differences in symptoms between H. pylori positive and negative subjects could not be detected, neither in the whole population nor in the non-ulcer group. In conclusion, in this Japanese working population, no association was found between dyspeptic symptoms and H. pylori infection, irrespective of the inclusion of subjects with a peptic ulcer history.

Seroepidemiology of gastritis in Japanese and Dutch working populations: evidence for the development of atrophic gastritis that is not related to Helicobacter pylori.

Serological markers of gastritis, like pepsinogen A, pepsinogen C, gastrin, and Helicobacter pylori antibodies, can be used to explore the state of the gastric mucosa in populations with contrasting cancer risks. A decreasing pepsinogen A:C ratio and an increasing serum gastrin are known to reflect an increasing severity of atrophic corpus gastritis, which is a precursor of gastric cancer. In 723 subjects (without gastroduodenal surgery) from Japanese (n = 225) and Dutch (n = 498) working populations, which had a similar composition of age (mean 48 years), sex (male to female ratio 6:1), and type of occupation, fasting serum samples were analysed for IgG antibodies to H pylori, pepsinogen A, pepsinogen C, and gastrin in the same laboratory. H pylori infection was significantly more prevalent in the Japanese than in the Dutch (74.7% and 31.3%); as was a very low pepsinogen A, indicative of severe mucosal atrophy (4.4% and 1.6%). Among subjects with and without severe mucosal atrophy the H pylori seropositivity rate was similar. Between the Japanese and the Dutch there were significant differences in mean gastrin (31.8 and 13.4 pmol/l) and pepsinogen A:C ratio (1.7 and 2.9). These intercountry differences were as great for H pylori negative subjects (gastrin: 23.7 and 10.3 pmol/l, pepsinogen A:C ratio: 2.4 and 3.2) as for H pylori positive subjects (gastrin: 34.6 and 20.1 pmol/l, pepsinogen A:C ratio: 1.5 and 2.5). The intercountry difference in gastrin nearly disappeared after stratification into categories of pepsinogen A:C ratio. In conclusion, the intercountry differences in pepsinogen A:C ratio and gastrin reflect a higher prevalence of mild and severe mucosal atrophy of the corpus in the Japanese than in the Dutch, both among H pylori positive and negative subjects. Thus, these findings suggest that in the Japanese the development of atrophic gastritis is in part unrelated to H pylori.

Nonulcer dyspepsia in a Dutch working population and Helicobacter pylori. Ulcer history as an explanation of an apparent association.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable debate about whether Helicobacter pylori infection is important in causing nonulcer dyspepsia. Many studies assessing this relationship have been performed in selected patient populations and included patients with a history of peptic ulcer. General population-based data with attention to ulcer history are needed to clarify this relationship. METHODS: A questionnaire on ulcer history and dyspeptic symptoms during the preceding 3-month period was obtained from apparently healthy employees who underwent a periodic medical examination in the Netherlands. In addition, serum samples were analyzed for anti-H pylori IgG antibodies. RESULTS: A total of 427 men and 73 women, aged 22 to 69 years, participated in the study. None of the women but 27 men (6%) had a previous diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Among 19 unoperated-on men with verified duodenal (17 subjects) and gastric (two subjects) ulcer, 89% were H pylori positive, while 74% had frequent dyspeptic symptoms in the 3 months before the study. Among the 400 men and 73 women without an ulcer history, the 3-month period prevalence of frequent dyspepsia was 13% and 21%, respectively. The rate of H pylori positivity was 25% in subjects with nonulcer dyspepsia and 29% in all others. The H pylori infection rate increased with age and with a lower occupational level but was independent of gender. In the male population, various differences in symptoms between H pylori-positive and H pylori-negative subjects could be detected when the 27 subjects with a history of ulcer were included, whereas these differences disappeared when these subjects were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: In the Dutch working population, nonulcer dyspepsia is not related to H pylori infection, whereas for duodenal ulcer the relationship is clear. The apparent association between dyspeptic symptoms and H pylori infection is entirely accounted for by subjects with an ulcer history.

Familial essential thrombocythemia: clinical characteristics of 11 cases in one family.

Reports on familial occurrence of essential thrombocythemia (ET) are scanty. Many clinical and hematological aspects of familial ET have not been clarified yet. We studied 16 family members in four successive generations. By laboratory tests and bone marrow examination they were divided into a non-thrombocythemia group (n = 5) and into ET patients (n = 11). Five ET patients were asymptomatic, three patients had both vaso-occlusive and hemorrhagic symptoms, and three patients only vaso-occlusive symptoms. The platelet count ranged from 500 to 1700 x 10(9)/l. Symptoms correlated with age but not with platelet count. ADP-induced platelet aggregation distinguished best between patients and non-ET subjects. Four patients and four non-ET subjects had factor VIII:C or von Willebrand factor antigen abnormalities; all but one had blood group O. These abnormalities were not due to inherited von Willebrand's disease according to haplotype analysis. Two patients and three non-ET subjects had a bleeding diathesis. One of these two patients and all three non-ET subjects had a decreased factor VIII:C or vWF:Ag. No chromosome abnormalities were found. In conclusion, familial ET has a relatively benign course with clinical manifestations similar to nonfamilial cases, and it is probably transmitted by an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance.