RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization is associated with improved outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) represents an emerging angiography-based tool for functional lesion assessment. The present study investigated the prognostic impact of QFR-consistent complete revascularization in patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. METHODS: A total of 792 patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease were enrolled in the analysis. Post-hoc QFR analyses of 1320 non-culprit vessels were performed by investigators blinded to clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, non-culprit vessel related non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization at two years after index myocardial infarction. Patients were stratified into a QFR-consistent PCI group (n=646) and a QFR-inconsistent PCI group (n=146), based on whether the intervention was congruent with the QFR-determined functional significance of the non-culprit lesions. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurred in a total of 22 patients (3.4%) in the QFR-consistent PCI group and in 27 patients (18.5%) in the QFR-inconsistent group (HR 0.17, 95%CI 0.10-0.30, p<0.001).The difference in the primary endpoint was driven by reduced rates of non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.0% vs. 15.1%; HR 0.13, 95%CI 0.06-0.25; p<0.001) and ischemia-driven revascularization (1.2% vs. 5.5%; HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.08-0.57; p=0.001) in the QFR-consistent PCI group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, a QFR-consistent complete revascularization was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization. These findings underline the value of angiography-based functional lesion assessment for personalized revascularization strategies.
RESUMO
Cardiac amyloidosis is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy characterized by the extracellular deposition of amyloid fibrils within the myocardium. Beyond heart failure, patients with cardiac amyloidosis commonly present with arrhythmias and conduction system disorders. Atrial fibrillation is observed in up to 80% of patients at the time of diagnosis, with patients typically maintaining normal heart rates due to concurrent atrioventricular nodal disease. The thromboembolic risk is particularly high in patients with cardiac amyloidosis, and left atrial thrombi have been observed even in the absence of atrial fibrillation. Conduction system diseases are also highly prevalent, often necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation. The use of implantable defibrillators in this population remains controversial. This overview of published data and therapeutic strategies related to arrhythmias and conduction system disorders aims to assist readers in decision-making in complex clinical scenarios.
RESUMO
AIMS: Interventional cardiologists are exposed to substantial occupational ionising radiation. This study sought to investigate differences in radiation exposure in biplane versus monoplane coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: RAMBO (RAdiation exposure in Monoplane versus Biplane cOronary angiography and interventions) was a prospective, randomised, two-arm, single-centre, open-label trial, enrolling a total of 430 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Patients were randomly assigned to biplane or monoplane imaging. The primary efficacy measure, the operator radiation dose at the level of the left arm as measured by a wearable electronic dosimeter, was significantly higher in the biplane as compared to the monoplane group (4 [1-13] µSv vs 2 [0-6.8] µSv, p<0.001). The dose area product was 11,955 (7,095-18,246) mGy*cm2 and 8,349 (5,851-14,159) mGy*cm2 in the biplane and the monoplane groups, respectively (p<0.001). While fluoroscopy time did not differ between the groups (p=0.89), the amount of contrast medium was lower with biplane as compared with monoplane imaging (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Biplane imaging for coronary angiography and PCI is related to an increased radiation exposure for the interventional cardiologist as compared with monoplane imaging. Monoplane imaging should be considered for advanced radioprotection in cardiac catheterisation, with biplane imaging used for selected cases only.
