Standardized Interview Scoring Methodology for Neurosurgical Residency Applicant Selection.

Interviews are critical to the neurosurgery resident application process. The COVID-19 pandemic forced residency interview activities are conducted virtually. To maintain a degree of control during a period of uncertainty, our department implemented a standardized survey for interviewers to evaluate the noncognitive attributes and program compatibility of applicants. Our objective was to assess the reliability and biases associated with our standardized interviewer survey implemented in neurosurgical residency interviews. A 5-question interviewer survey to assess applicant interview performance and program compatibility was implemented during the 2020 to 2021 interview season. After the application cycle, survey metrics were retrospectively reviewed. Multiple cohort analyses were performed by dividing interviewers into cohorts based on status (faculty or resident) and sex. Applicant scores were assessed within sex subgroups for each aforementioned interviewer cohort. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess survey reliability. Fifteen interviewers (8 faculty and 7 residents) and 35 applicants were included. Female applicants (17%) and interviewers (20%) comprised the minority. There were no differences between resident and faculty reviewer scores; however, female reviewers gave higher overall scores than male reviewers ( P = .003). There was no difference in total scores between female and male applicants when evaluating all reviewers or subgroups of faculty, residents, females, or males. ICC analysis demonstrated good (ICC 0.75-0.90) or excellent (ICC > 0.90) reliability for all questions and overall score. The standardized interviewer survey was a feasible and reliable method for evaluating noncognitive attributes during neurosurgery residency interviews. There was no perceptible evidence of sex bias in our single-program experience.

The Utility of Remote Video Technology in Continuing Neurosurgical Care in the COVID-19 Era: Reflections from the Past Year.

OBJECTIVE: In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic exposed existing stressors in the neurosurgical care infrastructure in the United States. We aimed to detail innovative technologic solutions inspired by the pandemic-related restrictions that augmented neurosurgical education and care delivery. METHODS: Several digital health and audiovisual innovations were implemented, including use of remote video technology to facilitate inpatient consultations and outpatient ambulatory virtual visits, optimize regional hospital neurosurgical coverage, expand interdisciplinary patient management conferences (i.e., tumor board), and further enhance the neurosurgical resident education program. Enterprise patient experience data were queried to evaluate patient satisfaction following the switch to virtual visits. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and April 2021, use of virtual visits more than doubled in the Department of Neurosurgery. A survey of 10,772 patients following ambulatory visits showed that virtual visits were equal if not better in providing satisfactory patient care than in-person visits. After switching our interdisciplinary spine tumor board to a virtual meeting, we increased surgeon participation and attendance by 49.29%. Integration of remote audiovisual technology in resident didactics and clinical training improved our ability to provide comprehensive and personalized educational experiences our trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Digital health technology has improved neurosurgical care and comprehensive training at our institution. Investment in the technologic infrastructure required for these remote audiovisual services during the COVID-19 pandemic will facilitate the expansion of neurosurgical care provision for patients across the United States in the future. Governing bodies within organized neurosurgery should advocate for the continued financial and licensing support of these service on a national fiscal and policy level.

Analysis of adjacent-segment cervical kinematics: the role of construct length and the dorsal ligamentous complex.

OBJECTIVE: Lateral mass fixation stabilizes the cervical spine while causing minimal morbidity and resulting in high fusion rates. Still, with 2 years of follow-up, approximately 6% of patients who have undergone posterior cervical fusion have worsening kyphosis or symptomatic adjacent-segment disease. Based on the length of the construct, the question of whether to extend the fixation system to undisrupted levels has not been answered for the cervical spine. The authors conducted a study to quantify the role of construct length and the terminal dorsal ligamentous complex in the adjacent-segment kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine. METHODS: In vitro flexibility testing was performed using 6 human cadaveric specimens (C2-T8), with the upper thoracic rib cage and osseous and ligamentous integrity intact. An industrial robot was used to apply pure moments and to measure segmental motion at each level. The authors tested the intact state, followed by 9 postsurgical permutations of laminectomy and lateral mass fixation spanning C2 to C7. RESULTS: Constructs spanning a single level exerted no significant effects on immediate adjacent-segment motion. The addition of a second immobilized segment, however, created significant changes in flexion-extension range of motion at the supradjacent level (+164%). Regardless of construct length, resection of the terminal dorsal ligaments did not greatly affect adjacent-level motion except at C2-3 and C7-T1 (increasing by +794% and +607%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal ligamentous support was found to contribute significant stability to the C2-3 and C7-T1 segments only. Construct length was found to play a significant role when fixating two or more segments. The addition of a fused segment to support an undisrupted cervical level is not suggested by the present data, except potentially at C2-3 and C7-T1. The study findings emphasize the importance of the C2-3 segment and its dorsal support.

The effect of C2-3 disc angle on postoperative adverse events in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVEComplete radiographic and clinical evaluations are essential in the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Prior studies have correlated cervical sagittal imbalance and kyphosis with disability and worse health-related quality of life. However, little is known about C2-3 disc angle and its correlation with postoperative outcomes. The present study is the first to consider C2-3 disc angle as an additional radiographic predictor of postoperative adverse events.METHODSA retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with CSM who underwent surgeries from 2010 to 2014. Data collected included demographics, baseline presenting factors, and postoperative outcomes. Cervical sagittal alignment variables were measured using the preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Univariable logistic regression analyses were used to explore the association between dependent and independent variables, and a multivariable logistic regression model was created using stepwise variable selection.RESULTSThe authors identified 171 patients who had complete preoperative and postoperative radiographic and outcomes data. The overall rate of postoperative adverse events was 33% (57/171), and postoperative C2-3 disc angle, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, and C2-7 Cobb angle were found to be significantly associated with adverse events. Inclusion of postoperative C2-3 disc angle in the analysis led to the best prediction of adverse events. The mean postoperative C2-3 disc angle for patients with any postoperative adverse event was 32.3° ± 17.2°, and the mean for those without any adverse event was 22.4° ± 11.1° (p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONSIn the present retrospective analysis of postoperative adverse events in patients with CSM, the authors found a significant association between C2-3 disc angle and postoperative adverse events. They propose that C2-3 disc angle be used as an additional parameter of cervical spinal sagittal alignment and predictor for operative outcomes.

Establishing a surgical skills laboratory and dissection curriculum for neurosurgical residency training.

Surgical education has been forced to evolve from the principles of its initial inception, in part due to external pressures brought about through changes in modern health care. Despite these pressures that can limit the surgical training experience, training programs are being held to higher standards of education to demonstrate and document trainee competency through core competencies and milestones. One of the methods used to augment the surgical training experience and to demonstrate trainee proficiency in technical skills is through a surgical skills laboratory. The authors have established a surgical skills laboratory by acquiring equipment and funding from nondepartmental resources, through institutional and private educational grants, along with product donations from industry. A separate educational curriculum for junior- and senior-level residents was devised and incorporated into the neurosurgical residency curriculum. The initial dissection curriculum focused on cranial approaches, with spine and peripheral nerve approaches added in subsequent years. The dissections were scheduled to maximize the use of cadaveric specimens, experimenting with techniques to best preserve the tissue for repeated uses. A survey of residents who participated in at least 1 year of the curriculum indicated that participation in the surgical skills laboratory translated into improved understanding of anatomical relationships and the development of technical skills that can be applied in the operating room. In addition to supplementing the technical training of surgical residents, a surgical skills laboratory with a dissection curriculum may be able to help provide uniformity of education across different neurosurgical training programs, as well as provide a tool to assess the progression of skills in surgical trainees.

Multiple level discectomy and fusion.

The ventrolateral approach for surgical decompression of the cervical spine is widely used and well known to most spinal surgeons. Because compression of the spinal cord and nerve roots usually occurs ventral to the spinal cord, and the spinal cord does not tolerate traction, this approach allows safe and direct decompression of most compressive pathology. This article reviews the indications, diagnostic evaluation, and technique for multiple level discectomy and fusion. It further addresses the advantages and disadvantages of this technique compared with alternate surgical procedures.

The biomechanics of iatrogenic spinal destabilization and implant failure.

Revision spinal surgery is usually indicated in cases of persistent or recurrent symptoms related to neural compression, spinal deformity, or construct failure. An understanding of fundamental biomechanical principles of both spinal decompression and reconstructive strategies is essential to avoid unnecessary subsequent spinal operations.

Surgery for postarthrodesis adjacent-cervical segment degeneration.

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion has gained popularity because of its applicability to a variety of cervical spine disorders. The authors of long-term follow-up studies have demonstrated the development of degenerative changes in segments adjacent to fusion. So-called adjacent-segment disease causes symptomatic deterioration in up to 25% of the patients who have undergone anterior cervical decompression and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The causes of this condition are debated in the literature. The authors provide a review of the available literature on the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of postarthrodesis adjacent-segment degenerative disease.

Biomechanics of spinal deformity.

The correction of spinal deformity may be achieved by a variety of methods, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. The goals of spinal deformity surgery include reasonable correction of the curvature, prevention of further deformation, improvement of sagittal and coronal balance, optimization of cosmetic issues, and restoration/preservation of function. The failure to consider all these factors appropriately may result in a suboptimal outcome. Understanding fundamental biomechanical principles involved in the formation, progression, and treatment of spinal deformities is essential in the clinical decision-making process.

Persistent iliac crest donor site pain: independent outcome assessment.

OBJECTIVE: This study objectively defines the incidence of donor site pain in an independent outcome analysis. In addition, this study identifies the significant discrepancies that are observed when independent outcome assessment results are compared with the incidences determined by review of the operating surgeon's documented findings. METHODS: A review of patients who underwent iliac bone graft harvesting by a single neurosurgeon was conducted. The presence of iliac crest donor site pain, at a time remote from surgery, as determined by specific questioning and recorded in the neurosurgeon's written evaluation was compared with independent assessment findings obtained in structured telephone questionnaire interviews. During a 4-year period, 105 patients met the inclusion criteria. Both the operating surgeon' and independent interviewer's follow-up evaluations were completed for all study patients. Pain was classified into three categories, i.e., no pain, acceptable pain, or unacceptable pain. Patients were also asked to assess the severity of their donor site pain by using a visual analog scale. Statistical analyses comparing the incidences of iliac crest donor site pain in the operating surgeon's evaluations and the independent assessments were performed. RESULTS: When evaluated at a time remote from surgery, the true incidence of iliac crest donor site pain after graft harvest procedures (34%) was significantly greater than previously appreciated by the neurosurgeon (8%). Although occasional or mild pain was observed for 31% of patients, only 3% of all patients experienced unacceptable pain. CONCLUSION: Independent outcome assessment values should be provided to patients in preoperative discussions regarding donor site morbidity. Objective outcome analysis, based on independent observations, is crucial for the most accurate interpretation of perceptions of iliac crest donor site pain.