Higher BDNF plasma levels are associated with a normalization of memory dysfunctions during an antidepressant treatment.

One important symptom of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) is memory dysfunction. However, little is known about the relationship between memory performance and depression severity, about the course of memory performance during antidepressant treatment as well as about the relationship between memory performance and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Memory function [learning and delayed recall) was assessed in 173 MDD patients (mean age 39.7 ± 11.3 years] treated by a pre-defined treatment algorithm within the early medication change (EMC) study at baseline, days 28 and 56. Depression severity was assessed in weekly intervals, BDNF plasma levels were measured at baseline, days 14 and 56, BDNF exon IV and p11 methylation status at baseline. Linear mixed regression models revealed that the course of depression severity was not associated with the course of learning or delayed recall in the total group. 63 (36%) of the investigated patients showed memory deficits (percent range ≤ 16) at baseline. Of those, 26(41%) patients experienced a normalization of their memory deficits during treatment. Patients with a normalization of their delayed recall performance had significantly higher plasma BDNF levels (p = 0.040) from baseline to day 56 than patients with persistent deficits. Baseline BDNF exon IV promoter and p11 gene methylation status were not associated with memory performance. Our results corroborate a concomitant amelioration of learning and delayed recall dysfunctions with successful antidepressant therapy in a subgroup of patients and support a role of BDNF in the neural mechanisms underlying the normalization of memory dysfunctions in MDD. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00974155; EudraCT: 2008-008280-96.

Plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (pBDNF) and executive dysfunctions in patients with major depressive disorder.

Objectives: Executive dysfunctions are frequently seen in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and normalise in many cases during effective antidepressant therapy. This study investigated whether a normalisation of executive dysfunctions during antidepressant treatment correlates with or can be predicted by clinical parameters or levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).Methods: In 110 MDD patients with executive dysfunctions (percentile <16), executive functions and plasma BDNF levels were analysed at baseline, and days 14 and 56 of an antidepressant treatment. BDNF exon IV and P11 methylation status was studied at baseline.Results: Eighty patients (73%) experienced a normalisation of executive dysfunctions, while 30 (27%) suffered from persistent dysfunctions until day 56. Patients with persistent dysfunctions had significantly higher HAMD scores at days 14 and 56, and lower plasma BDNF levels at each time point than patients with a normalisation of dysfunctions (F1= 10.18; P = 0.002). This was seen for verbal fluency, but not processing speed. BDNF exon IV and p11 promoter methylation was not associated with test performance.Conclusions: Our results corroborate a concomitant amelioration of executive dysfunctions with successful antidepressant therapy and support a role of BDNF in the neural mechanisms underlying the normalisation of executive dysfunctions in MDD.ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00974155; EudraCT: 2008-008280-96.

BDNF Plasma Levels and BDNF Exon IV Promoter Methylation as Predictors for Antidepressant Treatment Response.

Major problems of current antidepressant pharmacotherapy are insufficient response rates and difficulties in response prediction. We recently provided preliminary evidence in a small study that patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with a hypomethylation of the CpG-87 site of the promoter IV region of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene are less likely to benefit from antidepressants. Here, we aimed at replicating this finding in a secondary analysis of 561 MDD patients (mean age 40.0 ± 11.9 years, 56% female) included into the Early Medication Change study (EMC). We measured BDNF exon IV promoter and p11 gene methylation at Baseline (BL) as well as BDNF-plasma-levels (pBDNF) at BL and day 14 and related them to treatment outcome. Although we were not able to replicate the predictor function of hypomethylation of the BDNF exon IV promoter, a subgroup of patients with severe depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD-17] ≥ 25) (n = 199) and hypermethylation at CpG-87 of the BDNF exon IV promoter had significantly higher remission rates than patients without a methylation (p = 0.032). We also found that 421 (75%) of 561 patients showed an early improvement (≥ 20% HAMD-17 reduction after 2 weeks), which was associated with a 4.24-fold increased likelihood to remit at study end compared to the 140 patients without early improvement. However, specificity of response prediction of early improvement was low (34%) and false positive rate high (66%). The combination of early improvement with a pBDNF increase between BL and day 14, however, increased the specificity of response prediction from 34 to 76%, and the combination with methylation of the CpG-87 site of the BDNF exon IV promoter from 34 to 62%. Thus, the combined markers reduced false positives rates from 66 to 24% and 38%, respectively. Methylation at other sites or p11 promoter methylation failed to increase specificity of early improvement prediction. In sum, the results add to previous findings that BDNF, BDNF promoter methylation and the combination of clinical and biological markers may be interesting candidates for therapy response prediction which has to be confirmed in further studies. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00974155, identifier: NCT00974155.

Randomized controlled study of early medication change for non-improvers to antidepressant therapy in major depression--The EMC trial.

Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and no improvement after two weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy have a high risk of treatment failure. The aim of the study was to determine whether an early medication change (EMC) strategy is superior to a guideline-based treatment in MDD patients without improvement after two weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Eight-hundred-and-eighty-nine patients with MDD were enrolled, 879 patients received the SSRI escitalopram. Of those, 192 patients had no improvement, defined as a reduction of < 20% on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) after 14 days of treatment, and were randomly assigned to open treatment with the EMC strategy (n = 97; venlafaxine XR for study days 15-56; in case of sustained non-improvement on day 28, lithium augmentation for days 29-56) or TAU (n = 95; escitalopram continuation; non-responders on day 28 were switched to venlafaxine XR for four weeks, i.e. days 29-56). The primary outcome was remission (HAMD-17 ≤ 7) after 8 weeks of treatment as assessed by blinded raters. Remission rates were 24% for EMC and 16% for TAU, which was not significantly different (p = 0.2056). Sensitivity analyses for the primary and secondary effectiveness endpoints consistently showed favorable results for patients randomized to EMC. The results confirm data from post-hoc analyses of clinical trials showing that early non-improvement identifies patients who likely need alternate interventions. However, the herein used two-step switch/augmentation strategy for this risk group was not more effective than the control intervention. Alternate strategies and other design aspects are discussed in order to support researchers addressing the same research question.

Severe tremor after cotrimoxazole-induced elevation of venlafaxine serum concentrations in a patient with major depressive disorder.

: We describe a female patient who was an extensive metabolizer of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme (CYP) 2D6 and an intermediate metabolizer of CYP2C19 (genotype: CYP2C19 *1/*2). She exhibited high serum concentrations of venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine and developed severe tremor after comedication with cotrimoxazole (sulfamethazole/trimethoprim). Venlafaxine is mainly metabolized by O- and N-demethylation. O-demethylation is catalyzed by the highly polymorphic CYP2D6 and N-demethylation by several enzymes, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4. The observed overall pharmacokinetic effect was most probably the result of decreased N-demethylation of venlafaxine by (1) reduced expression of CYP2C19 due to a genetic deficit and (2) inhibition of CYP2C9 by cotrimoxazole.

Early reactions of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in plasma (pBDNF) and outcome to acute antidepressant treatment in patients with Major Depression.

In Major Depressive Disorder, a growing data base suggests that the onset of antidepressants' action can be detected by improvement of depressive symptoms in the first 10-14 days of treatment. Previous studies showed that the mean concentration of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in blood increases during antidepressant treatment and positively correlates with amelioration of MDD symptoms. We previously showed an association between very early changes of the serum BDNF concentration and treatment outcome (Tadic et al., 2011. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35, 415-420). However, no study has yet investigated whether BDNF concentration in plasma increases in the early course of treatment and enables the prediction of final treatment outcome. The goal of this study was to investigate in MDD patients, whether the change of pBDNF in the early course of treatment is a specific and sensitive marker for final treatment outcome. For this purpose, we performed a naturalistic pilot study with 39 inpatients with MDD according to DSM-IV. Depression severity and pBDNF were measured in weekly intervals from baseline (EP) to endpoint (EP, max. week six) with the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-21) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. According to ROC-analysis, the best cut-off value for the prediction of response at EP is an increase of 338 pg/ml or 126%, respectively, of pBDNF between BL and day 7. The single markers pBDNF change and HAMD-21 improvement from BL-d7 predicted later treatment outcome with moderate to high sensitivity and specificity (pBDNF: 42% and 96%, resp.; HAMD improvement: 83% and 65%, resp.). The combined marker early pBDNF change plus HAMD-21 improvement at day 7 increased the specificity for response to 100%. Our data provide first preliminary evidence that an early change of pBDNF in conjunction with early improvement might be a peripheral marker predictive for treatment outcome in patients with MDD. This has to be confirmed in further investigations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.

The early non-increase of serum BDNF predicts failure of antidepressant treatment in patients with major depression: a pilot study.

In the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), early non-improvement of symptoms after initiation of antidepressant treatment is a highly sensitive and specific marker for final treatment failure. On the other hand, meta-analyses of clinical studies investigating serum BDNF (sBDNF) concentration before and after antidepressant treatment showed an increase of sBDNF during treatment, which was correlated with amelioration of depressive symptoms. No study has yet investigated the predictive value of early changes of sBDNF for final treatment outcome of the individual patient. The aim of this study was to investigate in patients with MDD, whether i) the non-increase of sBDNF in the early course of treatment is a specific and sensitive marker for final treatment failure, ii) whether the sensitivity and specificity of early non-improvement for treatment failure can be increased by combining it with the marker "early non-increase of sBDNF". For this purpose, we performed a pilot study with 41 inpatients with MDD according to DSM-IV, who were treated in a naturalistic setting. Depression severity and sBDNF were measured in weekly intervals from baseline to week six with the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-21) and ELISA, respectively. The individual markers sBDNF non-increase and HAMD-21 non-improvement from baseline to day 7 or 14 predicted later non-response and non-remission with moderate to high specificity. The combined marker sBDNF non-increase plus HAMD-21 non-improvement at day 14 increased the specificity for non-response and non-remission to 100%. Our data provide the first evidence that the absence of an early increase of sBDNF in conjunction with early non-improvement might be a highly specific peripheral marker predictive for treatment failure in patients with MDD. If replicated, this combined marker could be considered useful for prospective confirmatory trials in patients with MDD.

WITHDRAWN: Association analysis between the early change of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (sBDNF) and final change of depression severity during antidepressant treatment: A pilot study.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the Editor-in-Chief. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.