Development of a theory- and evidence-based intervention to enhance implementation of physical therapy guidelines for the management of low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Systematic planning could improve the generally moderate effectiveness of interventions to enhance adherence to clinical practice guidelines. The aim of our study was to demonstrate how the process of Intervention Mapping was used to develop an intervention to address the lack of adherence to the national CPG for low back pain by Dutch physical therapists. METHODS: We systematically developed a program to improve adherence to the Dutch physical therapy guidelines for low back pain. Based on multi-method formative research, we formulated program and change objectives. Selected theory-based methods of change and practical applications were combined into an intervention program. Implementation and evaluation plans were developed. RESULTS: Formative research revealed influential determinants for physical therapists and practice quality managers. Self-regulation was appropriate because both the physical therapists and the practice managers needed to monitor current practice and make and implement plans for change. The program stimulated interaction between practice levels by emphasizing collective goal setting. It combined practical applications, such as knowledge transfer and discussion-and-feedback, based on theory-based methods, such as consciousness raising and active learning. The implementation plan incorporated the wider environment. The evaluation plan included an effect and process evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention Mapping is a useful framework for formative data in program planning in the field of clinical guideline implementation. However, a decision aid to select determinants of guideline adherence identified in the formative research to analyse the problem may increase the efficiency of the application of the Intervention Mapping process.

Evaluation of the theory-based Quality Improvement in Physical Therapy (QUIP) programme: a one-group, pre-test post-test pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Guideline adherence in physical therapy is far from optimal, which has consequences for the effectiveness and efficiency of physical therapy care. Programmes to enhance guideline adherence have, so far, been relatively ineffective. We systematically developed a theory-based Quality Improvement in Physical Therapy (QUIP) programme aimed at the individual performance level (practicing physiotherapists; PTs) and the practice organization level (practice quality manager; PQM). The aim of the study was to pilot test the multilevel QUIP programme's effectiveness and the fidelity, acceptability and feasibility of its implementation. METHODS: A one-group, pre-test, post-test pilot study (N = 8 practices; N = 32 PTs, 8 of whom were also PQMs) done between September and December 2009. Guideline adherence was measured using clinical vignettes that addressed 12 quality indicators reflecting the guidelines' main recommendations. Determinants of adherence were measured using quantitative methods (questionnaires). Delivery of the programme and management changes were assessed using qualitative methods (observations, group interviews, and document analyses). Changes in adherence and determinants were tested in the paired samples T-tests and expressed in effect sizes (Cohen's d). RESULTS: Overall adherence did not change (3.1%; p = .138). Adherence to three quality indicators improved (8%, 24%, 43%; .000 ≤ p ≤ .023). Adherence to one quality indicator decreased (-15.7%; p = .004). Scores on various determinants of individual performance improved and favourable changes at practice organizational level were observed. Improvements were associated with the programme's multilevel approach, collective goal setting, and the application of self-regulation; unfavourable findings with programme deficits. The one-group pre-test post-test design limits the internal validity of the study, the self-selected sample its external validity. CONCLUSIONS: The QUIP programme has the potential to change physical therapy practice but needs considerable revision to induce the ongoing quality improvement process that is required to optimize overall guideline adherence. To assess its value, the programme needs to be tested in a randomized controlled trial.

Using histopathology breast cancer data to reduce clinical target volume margins at radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify the incidence and extension of microscopic disease around primary breast tumors in patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT), focusing on a potential application to reduce radiotherapy boost volumes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An extensive pathology tumor-distribution study was performed using 38 wide local excision specimens of BCT patients. Specimen orientation was recorded and microscopic findings reconstructed to assess the incidence of microscopic disease around the macroscopic tumor. A model of disease spread was built, showing probability of disease extension outside a treated volume (P(out,vol)). The model was applied in 10 new BCT patients. Taking asymmetry of tumor excision into account, new asymmetric margins for the clinical target volume of the boost (CTV(boost)) were evaluated that minimize the volume without increasing P(out,TTV) (TTV being total treated volume: V(surgery) + CTV(boost)). Potential reductions in CTV(boost) and TTV were evaluated. RESULTS: Microscopic disease beyond the tumor boundary occurred isotropically at distances > 1 cm (intended surgical margin) and > 1.5 cm (intended TTV margin) in 53% and 36% of the excision specimens, respectively. In the 10 prospective patients, the average P(out,TTV) was, however, only 16% due to larger surgical margins than intended in some directions. Asymmetric CTV(boost) margins reduced the CTV(boost) and TTV by 27% (20 cc) and 12% (21 cc) on average, without compromising tumor coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic disease extension may occur beyond the current CTV(boost) in approximately one sixth of patients. An asymmetric CTV(boost) that corrects for asymmetry of the surgical excision has the potential to reduce boost volumes while maintaining tumor coverage.

Validation of semiautomatic measurement of the extent of breast tumors using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether the semiautomatic measurement of breast-tumor extent using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) decreases measurement variation compared with manual evaluation and increases precision with respect to tumor extent measured at histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy for 46 tumors were consecutively included. Extended histopathology analysis was performed on the excision specimens. Two experienced breast-MR radiologists independently manually assessed the largest diameter of the tumors at preoperative CE-MRI. Two observers used a semiautomatic segmentation technique to independently obtain the largest diameter and the volume of the tumors. RESULTS: Semiautomatic volumetric measurement of tumor volume was more accurately correlated with histopathology (adjusted R-square 0.84 and 0.81) compared with conventional measurement (adjusted R-square 0.56 and 0.70) and semiautomatic measurement (adjusted R-square 0.63 and 0.60) of the largest diameter of the tumor. The interobserver variability between the volumetric measurements was significantly smaller than the interobserver variability between the largest-diameter measurements of tumor extent obtained by the radiologists (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Semiautomatic volumetric measurement of breast-tumor extent at CE-MRI provides a more accurate assessment of tumor extent with respect to histopathology and reduces measurement variation compared with manual assessment of the largest diameter. Automated volumetric measurement thus provides potential for increased precision in establishing response to treatment.