Falls in people with mobility limitations: a cross-sectional analysis of a US registry of assistive device users.

Purpose of the Article: To (1) summarise the personal and clinical characteristics of persons with disabilities (PwDs) in the US who were evaluated for mobility assistive equipment (MAE) in the functional mobility assessment and uniform dataset (FMA/UDS) and (2) stratify subpopulations of PwD who reported falling versus those who do not report a fall.Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective, descriptive cohort analysis of adults with disabilities using the FMA/UDS. Data are collected during a user's initial evaluation for a new mobility device. The sample is intentionally general to be inclusive of all mobility device users. The primary variable of interest was a patient-reported fall within the 3 months leading up to their evaluation for a new mobility device. Subpopulation characteristics were stratified by this binary fall variable.Results and Conclusions: This study provides descriptions of PwDs being evaluated for a new mobility device. There were 11,084 PwDs with 31 different primary diagnoses. During their new mobility device evaluation, 52.2% of PwDs reported at least one fall in the last 3 months. For those who reported a fall, 46.6% of PwDs were using a walking aid or no device at all before the new mobility device evaluation. Additionally, persons with progressively acquired disabilities (i.e., Parkinson's disease, osteoarthritis and cardiopulmonary disease) reported higher rates of falls than those with congenital disabilities (i.e., cerebral palsy and spina bifida). These findings will influence future studies comparing different types of devices and their influence on falls and user satisfaction.Implications for rehabilitation52.2% of persons with disabilities (PwDs) seeking a new wheelchair evaluation reported at least one fall in the last 3 months.Persons with progressively acquired disabilities (i.e., Parkinson's disease, osteoarthritis and cardiopulmonary disease) reported higher rates of falls than those with congenital disabilities (i.e., cerebral palsy and spina bifida).Earlier interventions for fall prevention including professional wheelchair evaluations may be warranted, but further research is necessary to explore long-term effectiveness.

Test-Retest Reliability of the Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA): A Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: Currently, no self-report instruments exist for assessing satisfaction with performing instrumental activities of daily living and occupations for people with disabilities using internet-connected assistive devices like accessible smartphones, tablets, laptops, and apps. OBJECTIVE: To assess the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA) self-report outcome tool. DESIGN: Repeated-measures cohort study with a time frame of 7 to 21 days. SETTING: Multicity online recruitment at assistive technology clinics, nongovernmental organizations, advocacy and peer support groups for people with disabilities, and higher education institutions. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-four participants with disabilities, age 18 yr or older, with a mean age of 43.3 yr (range = 19-75 yr), and 57% female. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The a priori study hypotheses were that the EISA test-retest reliability scores would be above the minimum acceptable level (Rs > .80) and that internal consistency would be good (Cronbach's α = .70-.90). RESULTS: On the basis of the study data, the EISA, Version 1.0, demonstrated good test-retest reliability (Rs = .81) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .88). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of the test-retest reliability and internal consistency analyses provide good support for the EISA to be used in clinical settings. What This Article Adds: This article documents the reliability and internal consistency of, to our knowledge, the first-ever self-report instrument for assessing satisfaction with performance of everyday occupations for people with disabilities using internet-connected assistive devices such as smartphones, tablets, laptops, and apps.

Investigation of factors from assistive technology professionals that impact timeliness of wheelchair service delivery: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with variability in time from assessment to device delivery (cycle time). Our hypothesis was that device type and type of insurance would be the strongest predictor of cycle time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from the Functional Mobility Assessment/Uniform Dataset (FMA/UDS) Registry that at the time of analysis contained a sample of 2588 people with disabilities (PWD) who were provided with a wheeled mobility device (WMD) between 21 March 2016 and 29 June 2021. To examine the effect of individual factors on the variability in cycle time, a robust linear regression analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The average national cycle time was 101.5 (SD = 59.9) d. Geographic area (Capital Metro [p < .001], Great Lakes [p = .016], and Northeast area [p < .001]), higher years since onset of disability (p < .001) and customizable devices (p = .021) were associated with higher cycle time. Non-customizable devices (p = .005), scooters (p < .001), Group 2 power wheelchairs (PWCs; p < .001), and funding source (Medicaid managed care (p < .001) and "other" (p = .028)) were associated with lower cycle time. CONCLUSIONS: Longer cycle time is likely related to variations in clinical practice, insurance coverage criteria and the level of customizability of the device needed for a particular diagnosis, especially long-term disabilities.Implications for rehabilitationThe national average number of days between initial evaluation and device delivery (cycle time) to deliver a wheeled mobility device (WMD) varies based on specific variables such as type of WMD, diagnosis and payer source.Geographic area, years since onset of disability, device type, primary diagnosis and funding source significantly impact cycle times.Increased complexity of the WMD, both manual and power wheelchairs (PWCs), was associated with longer cycle times.As more service delivery models emerge, specific benefits and challenges need to be reported on how they impact cycle time.

A descriptive analysis of wheelchair repair registry data.

Wheeled mobility and seating (WMS) devices allow users to achieve greater mobility independence. Previous studies determined that 53% of wheelchair users required one or more repairs over a 6-month period; however, there are a limited number of studies that have evaluated types of repairs. The purpose of this study was to describe the types of manual wheelchair, power wheelchair, and scooter repairs within the Wheelchair Repair Registry (WRR) and examine the association between WMS devices and the frequency of repairs. A dataset of 4,645 devices distributed in the United States was collected from equipment suppliers who performed and logged community-based wheelchair repair services. The results demonstrated common repairs found across devices were within the wheels/tires/forks and batteries/cables categories. Device type was the most significant predictor of variance in the number of repairs. Customizable manual wheelchairs, tilt-in-space, Groups 2 & 3 power wheelchairs, and scooters were associated with higher number of repairs compared to non-customizable manual wheelchairs, pediatric, heavy-duty manual wheelchairs, and Group 4 power wheelchairs. The higher failure rate found in specific devices may be associated with a population of more active users, environment/conditions where equipment is used, time spent in equipment, additional features on device, or lower durability.

Estimating power wheelchair battery lifespan based on real-world data.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to: (1) estimate battery lifespan in power wheelchairs (PWCs) as measured by the length of time until battery replacement occurs and (2) identify factors associated with variability in battery lifespan after device distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PWCs distributed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018 were retrieved from the Wheelchair Repair Registry (WRR) and included into this retrospective cohort study. Factors associated with battery lifespan were examined with the stratified Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: A data set of 1268 PWCs from four different manufacturers was analysed. Five hundred and ten PWCs (40.2%) had one battery replacement with median battery lifespan of 22.3 months. The overall cumulative incidences of battery replacement were 14.5%, 56.2% and 88.2% at the end of the first, second and third year after device distribution, respectively. Among PWC manufacturers, manufacturer C (hazard ratio (HR), 2.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.35-5.12; p = 0.004) and manufacturer D (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.51-6.01; p = 0.002) were associated with shorter battery lifespan. PWCs operated in warmer states (65-75 °F annual temperature averages) were associated with longer battery lifespan. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that the median battery lifespan was 22 months. PWC manufacturer and operating climate temperature were associated with variability in battery lifespan. This research has implications to better inform users, providers, manufacturers and payers to be more aware of battery lifespan across PWC types and manufactures to anticipate replacement timelines and avoid adverse situations associated with battery failures. Implications for rehabilitationThere are differences in battery lifespan across different power wheelchair (PWC) manufactures.Power wheelchair batteries last longer in warmer operating climates.Future attention needs to be sought towards the types of batteries manufacturers are using for PWC group classifications.These types of studies could be useful to justify reasonable timelines and the costs associated with battery replacements.

Functional mobility, employment and safety benefits of seat elevating devices.

STATUS OF RESEARCH PROCESS: Study completed. INVOLVEMENT OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY USERS: Participants were power wheelchair users.

A cross-sectional descriptive analysis of complex rehabilitation technology (CRT) supplier opinions on the current state of wheelchair repair services.

PURPOSE: It is documented that wheelchair failures occur frequently, repair times are lengthy, and users often experience adverse consequences. This study aims to gather evidence on efficiency of current wheelchair repair processes from the perspective of complex rehabilitation technology (CRT) suppliers who perform repairs within the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 20 statement survey was developed to identify barriers and facilitators related to wheelchair repairs across the domains of administrative and operational factors as well as to identify future opportunities for improvement. Key statements in these areas included time to perform a repair, documentation requirements, tracking repair progress, reimbursement, technician competency, emerging strategies and preventative maintenance. The online survey was broadly disseminated to a nationwide network of CRT suppliers for data collection. RESULTS: A total of 127 responses were received. Results showed that administrative statements received the lowest scores while those statements dealing with future opportunities received the highest scores. Areas of the industry that suppliers were in most disagreement with included wait time for insurance approval, reimbursement for parts, reimbursement for technician travel time and lack of coverage for preventative maintenance. Telehealth system usage, preventative maintenance coverage, tracking repairs and repair scheduling were future opportunities that suppliers were in most agreement with. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative issues exist in the CRT industry due to restrictive insurance policies associated with repairs and maintenance. Future opportunities to improve the process exist including payment models and the application of telehealth, device monitoring and service-based performance incentives to reduce adverse consequences to the user. Implications for rehabilitationHighlights the direct importance and barriers faced within the wheelchair repair industry by CRT suppliers.In a sample of CRT suppliers, there is agreement there exists many administrative and operational issues related to wheelchair repairs.There is agreement among survey respondents of opportunities to investigate further telehealth and remote strategies, preventative maintenance coverage and online tracking for wheelchair repairs.

Development, validation and feasibility study of a remote basic skills assessment for wheelchair service providers.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to develop, validate and conduct a feasibility study of three remote basic skills assessment modalities for wheelchair service providers (WSP) including an online case study quiz (m1), an in-person skills assessment (m2) and a video conference skills assessment (m3). METHODS: We conducted a literature review; developed and validated 3 basic skills assessments; and conducted a feasibility study of each modality. RESULTS: The literature review revealed that a validated remote basic skills assessment for WSP that reflects all World Health Organization (WHO) 8 wheelchair service provision steps did not exist. We recruited a total of 12 participants for the feasibility study. Two participants dropped out of the study prior to completing a second testing modality. Related to test performance, the results show that our first hypothesis was rejected because only m1 mean score was comparable to the International Society of Wheelchair Professionals (ISWP) Basic Knowledge Test (SD = 0.44). This is in contrast with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test results that show a statistically significant difference between these two modalities. We are therefore not confident that the knowledge test was an appropriate comparison to m1 skills assessment. Hypothesis two was not rejected. The feasibility results reveal 86% success. CONCLUSION: M1, 2 and 3 have the potential to serve as remote basic skills assessments. However, according to both test performance and feasibility criteria, we believe that m2 has the highest potential to be included in certification processes for basic wheelchair service providers, like the one offered by ISWP.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONA universal remote basic skills assessment that can be accessed across the globe, especially in remote locations where a skilled and experienced provider is not available, is needed.Such test can be an asset to training or professional organisations like ISWP as a way to test WSP competency or to warrant certification.WSP clinical knowledge and skills are essential for the prescription of an appropriate wheelchair to avoid physical harm, abandonment of the device and unnecessary expenses.Properly prescribed wheelchairs allow people with impaired mobility to gain increased ability to perform ADLs, participate in communities, and reduce secondary medical complications such as upper limb repetitive strain injuries, pain, and/or pressure sores.

Development of a Home-Based Telerehabilitation Service Delivery Protocol for Wheelchair Seating and Mobility Within the Veterans Health Administration.

INTRODUCTION: The provision of seating and wheeled mobility devices is a complex process that requires trained professionals and multiple appointments throughout the service delivery process. However, this can be inconvenient and burdensome for individuals with mobility limitations or for individuals who live in rural areas. Rural areas often present unique difficulties regarding the provision of healthcare services including lengthy travel times to medical facilities and lack of specialized providers and medical technology. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the development and implementation of a service delivery protocol for a home-based telerehabilitation assessment for wheelchair seating and mobility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The telerehabilitation team consists of a trained wheelchair seating and mobility therapist and a telehealth clinical technician (TCT). In order to determine veterans that are appropriate for a home-based telerehabilitation assessment, a three-phase pre-assessment screening process was conducted by the therapist and TCT, including consult, chart, and phone review. Veterans that met all of the predetermined eligibility criteria were recommended for a telerehabilitation wheelchair assessment. The TCT traveled to the veteran's residence with necessary evaluation and safety equipment and connected with the therapist remotely using the VA Video Connect platform. Assessment and veteran data were collected during the initial evaluation and then during a 21-day follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-three veterans were successfully seen via telerehabilitation for a seating and wheeled mobility assessment between November, 2017 and July, 2018. The average travel distance between the veteran's residence and the clinic was 34.1 miles. The total telerehabilitation encounter times ranged from 45 min to 145 min. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of this service delivery protocol for wheelchair seating and mobility assessments demonstrated the benefits of using telehealth services including reaching rural veterans, reducing distance traveled, maximizing efficiency of provider schedules, and conducting realistic assessments in veterans' home environments. Success can be attributed to being able to deliver best practice remotely and to the rapport of the TCT with the providers. Cultivating provider buy-in, selecting appropriate outcome measures, and restructuring workflows were additional lessons learned. The VA Video Connect platform is an accessible tool that can be easily learned by both veterans and providers and used beyond initial wheelchair seating evaluations for improved access to follow-up healthcare services.

Community-based wheelchair caster failures call for improvements in quality and increased frequency of preventative maintenance.

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of wheelchair failures and service repair logs from a network of wheelchair suppliers. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of wheelchair caster failures and service repairs across wheelchair manufacturers and models and investigate the relationships between them. SETTING: Wheelchair caster failures and service repairs occurred in the community. METHODS: Reported caster failure types were classified based on the risk they pose for user injuries and wheelchair damage. Caster failures experienced by users of tilt-in-space and ultralightweight manual wheelchair models and Group 2, 3 and 4 power wheelchair models between January 2017 and October 2019 were analyzed using Chi-Square tests for independence. Correlational analysis of failures and service repairs was performed. RESULTS: A total of 6470 failures and 151 service repairs reported across four manufacturers and five models were analyzed. Failure types were significantly associated with manufacturers and models, respectively. Users of tilt-in-space wheelchairs, who require greater seating support, experienced twice the proportion of high-risk caster failures than the ultralightweight manual wheelchair users. Similarly, Group 3 and 4 power wheelchair users, who have complex rehabilitation needs, experienced 15-36% more high-risk failures than Group 2 users. Service repairs negatively correlated with high-risk manual wheelchair caster failures. CONCLUSIONS: Wheelchair users who have greater seating and complex rehabilitation needs are at a higher risk for sustaining injuries and secondary health complications due to frequent caster failures. The study findings call for significant reforms in product quality and preventative maintenance practices that can reduce wheelchair failures and user consequences.

Face validity of standardized assessments for wheeled mobility & seating evaluations.

A problem in the Complex Rehabilitation Technology industry is the lack of standardization in the assessment for wheeled mobility and seating (WMS). The aim of this paper was to identify assessment tools commonly used by clinicians during WMS evaluations. After the tools were identified by a panel of 12 subject matter experts, a presentation at the 2018 International Seating Symposium in Vancouver, Canada and the 2018 European Seating Symposium in Dublin, Ireland polled attendees via the Sli.do polling application to determine professional opinions of each tool, resulting in face validity for use in wheelchair evaluations. The Lawshe Content Validity Ratio was used to convert this anecdotal data into numerical data, indicating which tools were most and least used by attendees. Finally, a literature search was conducted to determine the reliability, validity, and International Classification of Functioning, Disability, & Health domain for each measure. The findings indicate that while there are many standardized and reliable assessment tools available for wheeled mobility and seating evaluations, most clinicians use only a few standardized assessment tools during WMS evaluations.

Development and content validation of the Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA) outcome tool.

This study describes the development and content validation of the Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA), a self-report outcome measure for assessing satisfaction with completing instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) for People With Disabilities (PWD) using internet-Connected Assistive Devices (iCAD). For this study, an iCAD is defined as any information communication technology/electronic device or software that assists with promoting, maintaining, and/or enhancing the ability of a PWD to live independently in society. Phase 1 of development involved generating an initial item pool based on a literature review. Content validity of the EISA was computed in Phase 2 using the Qualtrics on-line research platform. Utilizing the content validity index procedure, EISA demonstrated acceptable content validity: item level (I-CVI of 0.78 or higher) and scale level (S-CVI/Ave of 0.90 or higher). EISA version 1.0 was generated in Phase 3 where it is the first of its kind outcome measure specifically designed for assessing satisfaction with completing IADL for PWD using iCAD.

Effect of the Assistive Technology Professional on the Provision of Mobility Assistive Equipment.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with variability in satisfaction with functional mobility (as measured by the Functional Mobility Assessment [FMA]) in users of mobility devices. Our primary hypothesis was that device type and Assistive Technology Professional (ATP) involvement will be the most significant predictors of FMA score. Our secondary hypothesis was that ATP involvement is associated with use of more custom-fitted manual wheelchairs and group 3 and 4 power wheelchairs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data were collected from equipment suppliers who collaborate with clinicians to administer the FMA and associated Uniform Data Set within various settings (ie, rehabilitation clinic, school, supplier place of business). PARTICIPANTS: A data set of 4743 cases was included in the analysis (N=4743). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FMA questionnaire collected at baseline, client age, gender, primary diagnosis, years since disability onset, device type, device age, living situation, ATP involvement, and geographic area. RESULTS: Ordinal logistic regression modeling showed that geographic area, device type, ATP involvement, primary diagnosis, gender, age, device age, and years since onset of disability significantly predicted the variance in FMA scores at P<.05. Device type was the most significant predictor of variance in FMA score. Involvement of an ATP had a significant effect on the type of device that participants used (χ220=1739.18, P<.001; odds ratio, 0.589; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.708). If an ATP was involved, there were significantly higher proportions (all P<.05) of individuals using custom-fitted manual wheelchair and high-end groups 3 and 4 power wheelchairs prescribed compared with when no ATP was involved or when involvement was uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between ATP involvement and functional outcome supports the concept that ATP certification recognizes demonstrated competence in analyzing the needs of consumers with disabilities and selection of appropriate mobility assistive equipment with improved functional outcomes.

Development of a Wheelchair Repair Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of a wheelchair repair registry from large datasets to attain an understanding of wheelchair failures and service repairs. DESIGN: Guidelines for registry development were applied and anchored around Labor-Tracker, a web-based information management system for wheelchair suppliers to manage and track wheelchair repairs. The registry was designed using online analytical processing, allowing for rapid data queries from multiple dimensions that enable complex data analysis and discovery. SETTING: The Wheelchair Repair Registry (WRR) was developed through an industry and academic collaboration whereby repair data were collected in the field, entered into the Labor-Tracker system, deidentified, and then transferred to the registry and made available for analyses. PARTICIPANTS: Wheelchair supplier service technicians reported data from repair services provided to individuals who use power wheelchairs, manual wheelchairs, and scooters. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Wheelchair failure and repair data, including variables related to scheduling, equipment information (eg, manufacturer, model, serial number, purchase date), labor, parts, and reasons for repairs. RESULTS: The WRR was developed to analyze wheelchair repairs and failures from the Labor-Tracker system. Currently, the registry has more than 60,000 repairs conducted on more than 5000 wheelchair devices from 25 manufacturers. The devices include 60% power wheelchairs, 35% manual wheelchairs, and 5% scooters. CONCLUSIONS: The WWR creates opportunities to apply large-data analytical methodologies that will serve to inform quality standards, practice, equipment selection, preventative maintenance routines, product design, and policy.

An exploratory study analyzing demographics and opinions of assistive technology professionals within the complex rehab technology industry.

This exploratory study investigated the demographics of Assistive Technology Professionals (ATPs) regarding their age, education, certifications, ethnicity, gender, veteran status, disability status, method of financial compensation, company type, and category. In addition, it analyzed opinions on the Complex Rehab Technology (CRT) industry regarding education level and licensure. An 18-question survey developed and disseminated by the University of Pittsburgh in collaboration with the National Coalition for Assistive & Rehab Technology (NCART) resulted in 252 responses from current ATPs in the Supplier/Manufacturing industry. The average age of respondents of 51.9 years showed to be above the national average workforce age of 42.2 years. Data were analyzed as a whole and by comparing answers for respondents below and above the average age. 92.4% of the respondents were Caucasian and 79.0% were male showing a need for diversity in the field. Forty-five percent of the younger age group had additional certifications compared to 30% of the older group. 79.8% of all respondents would recommend the ATP profession to someone looking for a career. Findings support the need to increase awareness of the ATP supplier/manufacturing profession to attract younger professionals including those from minority groups. Findings also support the need for additional training for the profession.

Functional mobility assessment is reliable and correlated with satisfaction, independence and skills.

Mobility is essential for activities of daily living and therapists should give priority to evaluate its effects in their client's performance. We aimed to ascertain the intra- and inter-rater reliability of Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) and to identify correlations among satisfaction, independence, and skills in 44 users of manual wheelchairs and three users of powered wheelchairs. We analyzed the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the FMA in a sample of 47 wheelchair users using the Cronbach's Alpha. For correlations with FMA were used the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology, Functional Independence Measure, and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (manual and powered forms). The test-retest reliability showed good internal consistency (α > 0.9). Associations between functional independence, wheelchair skills, and functional mobility were significant (p < .05). The Brazilian version of the FMA is reliable for use among wheelchair users, and its correlation with other measurements suggests cohesion among assessments related to mobility devices.

Demographic and Functional Characteristics of National Veterans Wheelchair Games Participants: A Cross-sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Although many studies report the impact of adaptive sports and recreation on quality of life for people with disabilities across several age groups, few have focused on the Veteran population. The purpose of this study was to establish a baseline of common characteristics of the Veteran population that participated in the National Veterans Wheelchair Games (NVWG) in 2017 and 2018, including their perception on how their participation is associated with function and social factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was implemented as part of a quality assurance collaboration between the University of Pittsburgh and the Veterans Administration National Veterans Sports Programs and Special Events. Demographic and quality-of-life data were collected through the Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) and associated Uniform Dataset as well as the Sports Participation Outcome Research Tool and Comprehensive Uniform Survey (SPORTACUS). This report provides and discusses the descriptive analyses that were performed on the data and establishes a framework to assess the impact of sports and exercise for Veterans with disabilities. RESULTS: A sample of 426 Veterans, 87% who were male and an average population age of 56 years old, reported high FMA scores on each of 10 items (daily routine, comfort, health, operate, reach, transfer, personal care, indoor mobility, outdoor mobility, and transportation) along with SPORTACUS scores scoring above 5, based on a 1-6 scoring scale (1 being "completely disagree" and 6 being "completely agree"), on each domain indicating sports participation is associated with their ability to function and participate in the community. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, it can be concluded for this military Veteran population that participation in a large, organized adaptive sports programs such as the NVWG has a positive association with daily function, quality of life, community participation, and use of higher quality assistive technology.

Exploratory Review: Self-Report IADL Assessments in the age of Internet-Connected Assistive Devices.

Internet-Connected Assistive Devices (iCAD), like accessible smartphones, tablets, computers, and apps, have become an integral part of everyday functioning for people with disabilities (PWD). The objective of this article was to identify self-report assessments having the relevance and clinical applicability for assessing satisfaction with performing Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) for PWD using iCAD. An exploratory review was conducted to identify self-report assessments that were appropriate, practical, clinically fit, and psychometrically acceptable, for assessing satisfaction with performing IADLs for PWD using iCAD. Thirty-two IADL assessments were identified, of which six met inclusion criteria. Four of six assessments did not specifically address iCAD usage, while two assessments had limited relevance and clinical applicability, for assessing satisfaction with performing IADLs for PWD using iCAD. This review establishes the growing need for a self-report IADL assessment that has been specifically designed and validated for assessing satisfaction with performing IADLs for PWD using iCAD.

Health App Review Tool: Matching mobile apps to Alzheimer's populations (HART Match).

Aim: This brief report provides an overview of the development and structure of the Health App Review Tool. Methods: The Health App Review Tool has been designed to assess smart phone health apps according to their compatibility to individuals within the Alzheimer's disease community. Specifically, app features and functions are characterized according to their appropriateness to the needs, abilities, and preferences of potential users. The Health App Review Tool is comprised of two components, the App and User Assessment; each component includes four complementary domains. Items in these domains can be compared between App and User assessments using a scoring key that will produce a match score. The score indicates the level of appropriateness in reference to the app's ability to meet the user's needs. Discussion: The Health App Review Tool was designed using available evidence and stakeholder preference data to ensure a user-centered design. The result was the development of a tool built on evidence and informed by the perceptions and preferences of those within and working with the Alzheimer's disease population. App and User domains include usefulness, complexity, accessibility, and external variables. This unique matching approach is anticipated to significantly impact individualized, client-centered care. We anticipate that this study will serve as a model for future development of technology matching tools for other diagnostic populations. Discussion: The Health App Review Tool was designed using available evidence and stakeholder preference data to ensure a user-centered design. The result was the development of a tool built on evidence and informed by the perceptions and preferences of those within and working with the Alzheimer's disease population. App and User domains include usefulness, complexity, accessibility, and external variables. This unique matching approach is anticipated to significantly impact individualized, client-centered care. We anticipate that this study will serve as a model for future development of technology matching tools for other diagnostic populations.