Sleep-endocrine effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in patients with schizophrenia.

Changes in sleep-EEG after endocrine stimulation tests in patients with schizophrenia include reduced sleep efficiency, prolonged sleep latency and increased awaking after sleep onset Findings on sleep associated growth hormone (GH) secretion were ambiguous. The aim of this study was to elucidate the sleep-endocrine activity especially in the GH system of patients with schizophrenia after repeated administration of GHRH. The effect of repetitive injections of 4 × 50 µg GHRH between 22.00 and 01.00 h on sleep endocrine parameters was investigated in 9 patients diagnosed for schizophrenia. Patients did not receive any medication for one week. Concentrations of ACTH, cortisol, prolactin and GH were determined. Patients spent three consecutive nights in the sleep laboratory. Blood was taken every 20min. Results were compared with matched healthy controls. A non-significant prolonged sleep onset latency and increased time awake was found in patients compared to controls. Sleep stage 2 was significantly reduced in patients. No significant difference in ACTH and cortisol was detected, whereas the GH secretion in patients following GHRH stimulation was significantly elevated compared to controls. Our results in drug free patients confirm already known changes in sleep-EEG in these patients. The GH response to GHRH-stimulation indicates a different regulatory sensitivity of the system between daytime and night-time.

Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with myocardial infarction using deterministic record linkage.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of care in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) should be based on data that effectively enable determination of quality. With the need to simplify measurement techniques, the question arises whether routine data can be used for this purpose. We therefore compared data from a German sickness fund (AOK) with data from the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry (BMIR). METHODS: We included patients hospitalised for treatment of MI in Berlin from 2009-2011. We matched 2305 patients from AOK and BMIR by using deterministic record linkage with indirect identifiers. For matched patients we compared the frequency in documentation between AOK and BMIR for quality assurance variables and calculated the kappa coefficient (KC) as a measure of agreement. RESULTS: There was almost perfect agreement in documentation between AOK and BMIR data for matched patients for: catheter laboratory (KC: 0.874), ST elevation MI (KC: 0.826), diabetes (KC: 0.818), percutaneous coronary intervention (KC: 0.860) and hospital mortality (KC: 0.952). The remaining variables compared showed moderate or less than moderate agreement (KC < 0.6), and were grouped in Category II with less frequent documentation in AOK for risk factors and aspects of patients' history; in Category III with more frequent documentation in AOK for comorbidities; and in Category IV for medication at and after hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Routine data are primarily collected and defined for reimbursement purposes. Quality assurance represents merely a secondary use. This explains why only a limited number of variables showed almost perfect agreement in documentation between AOK and BMIR. If routine data are to be used for quality assessment, they must be constantly monitored and further developed for this new application. Furthermore, routine data should be complemented with registry data by well-established methods of record linkage to realistically reflect the situation - also for those quality-associated variables not collected in routine data.