Brief Aging Education Impacts Continuing Education Preferences and Behaviors of Mental Health Providers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined the impact of receiving foundational information about aging on continuing education (CE) interests, preferences, and behaviors of mental health providers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD: Participants were practicing licensed professional counselors (LPCs; N = 120) recruited from a random sampling of a state registry. The study employed a three-group randomized controlled design with participants assigned to one of three conditions: an aging-specific reading, an Opioid Use Disorder-specific reading, and a CE requirement-specific reading. As outcomes, participants rated their interest in aging-specific CE and selected to receive an aging-specific CE or Motivational Interviewing-specific CE program. RESULTS: Perceived competence for working with older adults, assessed before the experimental manipulation, predicted choice and degree of interest in the aging-specific CE across conditions. Participants in the Aging-Reading condition rated a higher interest in aging-specific CE and were marginally more likely to select the aging-specific CE option than those in the other two conditions. Those in the Aging-Reading condition were also more likely to register for and complete an actual CE program focused on any topic. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Foundational knowledge about aging may increase practitioners' interest and behaviors towards gaining competency for working with older adults, supporting the PEACE model (Levy, 2018) of reducing ageism.

Building the Geropsychology Workforce: A National Survey and Virtual Conference Define Critical Obstacles and Steps Forward.

The number of psychologists prepared to work with older adults falls far short of the demand. In the face of perceptions of a worsening geriatric workforce shortage, we describe the process of developing and implementing a national virtual conference aimed at generating solutions. A preconference survey (n = 174) found fewer applicants than desirable for aging-targeted graduate student, trainee, clinician, or academic positions (58.6%) and decreased student interest in aging (43.7%), with downstream consequences of filling age-targeted positions by those without aging backgrounds (32.3%), difficulty securing funding for aging-related positions (28.7%), and loss of aging-related positions (27.0%). Two fifths (40.7%) felt these problems have worsened as compared to 5 years ago. Qualitative responses provide detailed perspectives on these barriers and strategies generally and in particular as relates to racial and ethnic diversity and academic geropsychology. During a 2-day conference, attendees developed and prioritized strategies. Following a postconference survey to ascertain interest in volunteering, seven work groups were formed that have made progress on these issues. A virtual conference provides an inclusive, cost-effective, and fruitful opportunity to discuss workforce concerns in geropsychology and to generate numerous ideas to promote positive change.

Working with older adults impacts training preferences of counselors.

Clinicians specializing in working with older adults make up a very small portion of providers, and the majority of the service provision falls on general practitioners. Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs) have heavily focused on Multicultural Competency in training and practice, but the profession has not specified standards of competence for work with older adults. Efforts to increase competency for generalists providing care for older adults are needed. A random sampling of LPCs was surveyed regarding demographic variables, work characteristics, perceived competence for working with older adults, and interest in aging-specific continuing education (CE). About half of the sample reported engaging in practice with older adults over the previous year. Counselors who reported practicing with older adults over the last year were more interested in aging-specific CE and reported higher perceived competence for working with older adults.

Neurocognitive Disorder Diagnoses Matter: A Brief Report on Caregiver Appraisal of Driving Ability.

Background: Age-associated neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) are associated with progressive loss of abilities for instrumental activities of daily living, including driving. This study assesses the impact of NCD diagnosis, while controlling for reported level of cognitive impairment, on family caregiver judgment of driving safety. Method: An intervention sample of 152 intergenerational caregivers who assist an older adult with medical tasks was used. Caregiver's pre-intervention response to a single item of confidence in the older adult driving was used to determine judgment of driving ability. Cognitive impairment was assessed using caregivers' report for Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Sum of Boxes score. Results: Older adults with a diagnosis were rated as less capable of driving safely than those without a diagnosis, while controlling for reported level of cognitive impairment. Conclusion: Results of this study highlight the importance of NCD diagnosis on caregiver judgments. Results of this study have implications for health care and driving safety.

Impairment for Medication Management in Older Adults: Validity of a Family Report Measure.

Objectives: Medication nonadherence can have significant consequences for the health of older adults. Difficulty managing medications is often a sign of cognitive impairment, and monitoring is an early caregiving task for family members. This study examined a screening tool for independence in medication management.Methods: Reliability and validity of the screening tool were assessed in a sample of 152 female care partners for a relative aged 65+years.Results: The tool showed sound test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and test utility, such that medication assistance was not better predicted by a global rating of cognitive impairment.Conclusions: In context of cognitive impairment, detection of medication mismanagement could be improved in both primary care and specialty health encounters through adoption of this single-item screening tool.Clinical Implications: This single-item report can be used to quickly facilitate discussions of medication management and cognitive impairment screening in office visits. The item also shows promise for efficient measurement of impairment in medication management than typical IADL assessment language.