Decreased plasma lipoprotein lipase in hypoadiponectinemia: an association independent of systemic inflammation and insulin resistance.

OBJECTIVE: Adiponectin is a plasma protein expressed in adipose tissue. Hypoadiponectinemia is associated with low HDL cholesterol and high plasma triglycerides, which also characterize lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency syndromes. Recently, dramatically increased LPL activity was reported in mice overexpressing adiponectin. We therefore speculated that adiponectin may directly affect LPL in humans. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We measured plasma adiponectin and postheparin LPL in 206 nondiabetic men and in a second group of 110 patients with type 2 diabetes. Parameters were correlated with markers of systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP]) and insulin resistance (homeostatis model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]). RESULTS: Nondiabetic subjects with decreased plasma adiponectin had lower LPL activity (r=0.42, P <0.0001). This association of plasma adiponectin with LPL activity was confirmed in the second group of patients with type 2 diabetes (r=0.37, P <0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that adiponectin was the strongest factor influencing LPL activity, accounting for 23% of the variation in LPL activity in nondiabetic subjects and for 26% of the variation in LPL activity in type 2 diabetic patients. These associations were independent of plasma CRP and HOMA-IR. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate an association of decreased postheparin LPL activity with low plasma adiponectin that is independent of systemic inflammation and insulin resistance. Therefore, LPL may represent a link between low adiponectin levels and dyslipidemia in both nondiabetic individuals and patients with type 2 diabetes.

Activity and concentration of lipoprotein lipase in post-heparin plasma and the extent of coronary artery disease.

Numerous studies have found polymorphisms in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene to be associated with the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), implicating LPL in the development of atherothrombotic disease. It remains controversial, however, whether LPL acts in a pro- or anti-atherogenic fashion. We quantitated activity and concentration of LPL in post-heparin plasma from 194 male patients undergoing coronary angiography. HDL cholesterol was significantly associated with LPL activity quartiles (1.09+/-0.26 the highest vs. 0.96+/-0.25 mmol/l the lowest quartile, P<0.01). There was also a trend towards higher total (5.61+/-1.33 vs. 5.16+/-1.44 mmol/l, P=0.059) and LDL cholesterol (3.92+/-1.39 vs. 3.46+/-1.06 mmol/l, P=0.09) with higher LPL activity. In contrast, measures of CAD extent showed no differences between LPL quartiles (P>0.30 for prior myocardial infarction, number of diseased vessels, Gensini and extent scores). Additionally, there was no difference in LPL activity (CAD: n=158, 168+/-70 nmol/ml/min, no CAD: n=36, 180+/-89 nmol/ml/min, P=0.47) or concentration (280+/-121 ng/ml and 288+/-111 ng/ml, P=0.72) between patients with and without CAD. Our data show that, in spite of an association with lipoprotein parameters, LPL in post-heparin plasma is unrelated to the presence or the extent of CAD. Therefore, lipoprotein lipase determination in plasma does not appear to be a useful marker in the assessment of CAD risk.