Association of Serum Soluble Transferrin Receptor Concentration With Markers of Inflammation: Analysis of 1001 Patients From a Tertiary Rheumatology Center.

OBJECTIVE: Soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) is considered to be a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of iron deficiency, especially in the setting of inflammation, as it is thought to not be affected by inflammation. We analyzed the relationship between sTfR levels and inflammatory markers in patients with known or suspected inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD). METHODS: Blood samples of 1001 patients with known or suspected IRD referred to a tertiary rheumatology center were analyzed. Study participants were classified as patients with active IRD and patients with inactive IRD or without IRD. Correlation analyses were used to explore the relationship between sTfR levels and inflammatory markers (ie, C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). We applied multiple linear regression analysis to evaluate the predictive value of CRP levels for sTfR concentrations after adjustment for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: There were positive correlations between inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR) and serum sTfR levels (ρ 0.44, ρ 0.43, respectively; P < 0.001), exceeding the strength of correlation between inflammatory markers and the acute phase reactant ferritin (ρ 0.30, ρ 0.23, respectively; P < 0.001). Patients with active IRD demonstrated higher serum sTfR levels compared to patients with inactive or without IRD (mean 3.99 [SD 1.69] mg/L vs 3.31 [SD 1.57] mg/L; P < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, CRP levels are predictive for serum sTfR concentrations (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence against the concept that sTfR is a biomarker not affected by inflammation.

Usefulness of Soluble Transferrin Receptor in the Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Clinical Practice.

Aim: We analyzed the added value of sTfR measurement in routine clinical practice to standard parameters (SP) of iron deficiency in the detection of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Blood samples from 116 patients with RA were analyzed in a prospective study. Based on biochemical parameters, patients were classified as having IDA, anemia of chronic disease (ACD), IDA with concomitant ACD (ACD/IDA), or "other anemia." Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of sTfR and SP of iron status alone and in combination were calculated for the diagnosis of IDA in general, i.e., IDA or ACD/IDA. Results: In the whole sample, with regard to the diagnosis of iron deficiency (IDA or ACD/IDA), sTfR had a higher sensitivity compared both to the combined use of SP and to the combination of SP with sTfR (80.9% versus 66.7/54.8%). Specificity, PPV and NPV did not differ substantially. When patients were stratified in groups with high (CRP levels above the median, i.e., 24.1 mg/l) and low (CRP levels less or equal to the median) inflammation, the diagnostic superiority of sTfR was restricted to patients with high inflammation. In this group, the diagnostic performance of sTfR was superior both to the combined use of SP and the combination of SP with sTfR with higher sensitivity (100% versus 52.4%) and NPV (100% versus 77.7/76.7%) and comparable specificity and PPV. Conclusion: For the detection of iron depletion (IDA or ACD/IDA) in anemic RA patients, sTfR is superior to SP of iron deficiency only in highly inflammatory states.

Riding the Escalator: How Dangerous is it Really?

INTRODUCTION: About 10,000 escalator-related injuries per year result in emergency department treatment in the United States. Since the 1990s, a steady increase has been reported, but few statistics on escalator-related injuries have been published worldwide. We have therefore analyzed escalator accident statistics in admissions to our hospital in Switzerland since 2000. METHODS: Using retrospective electronic patient chart analysis, we included in our study patients >16 years treated over an 11-year period. We categorized patients in terms of gender, age and associated risk factors, and classified accidents according to day, time, location and cause. Resulting trauma was categorized according to type and location. We divided post-admission treatment into surgical and conservative, and into treatment as an outpatient, in a short-stay unit, or as a hospital admission. Women and men were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: We identified 173 patients with 285 discrete injuries. Of these, 87 patients (50%) were women. Fifty-three (61%) of the women and 38 (44%) of the men were >60 years old (P = 0.033). Fifty percent of the men (43/86) of the men, but only 7% (6/87) of the women showed signs of alcohol intoxication (P < 0.0001). Accidents in women occurred predominantly on Tuesdays (19/87; 22%) between 12pm and 6pm (35/87; 40%), and in men on Saturdays (16/86; 19%) between 6pm and 12am (29/86; 34%; P = 0.0097). Sixty-two percent (44/71) of the accidents were in public transport facilities and 30% (21/71) in shopping centers. The majority of injuries in women were to the lower extremities (49/87; 56%), while most accidents in men were to the head and neck (51/86; 59%; P = 0.0052). About half (90; 52%) of the patients were treated conservatively. Almost half of all patients (76, 44%) required hospital admission. Of those, 45% left the hospital within 24 hours of admission (short stay unit) and 55% stayed longer than 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Escalator accidents can result in severe trauma. Significant gender differences in escalator accidents have been observed. Alcohol intoxication and age are significant risk factors in escalator-related accidents and might be possible targets for preventive measures.