Cysteamine toxicity in patients with cystinosis.

OBJECTIVE: To report new adverse effects of cysteamine. STUDY DESIGN: Detailed clinical information was obtained from the patients' physicians. RESULTS: New adverse events were reported in 8 of 550 patients with cystinosis treated with cysteamine in Europe during the last 5 years. Detailed clinical information was not available for 2 of these patients, 1 of whom died from cerebral ischemia. The 6 evaluable patients developed vascular elbow lesions (6/6), neurologic symptoms (1/6), bone and muscle pain (2/6), and/or skin striae (2/6). Analysis of biopsy specimens from the elbow lesions demonstrated angioendotheliomatosis with irregular collagen fibers. In 3 of the 6 patients, the daily cysteamine dose exceeded the recommended maximum of 1.95 g/m(2)/day. Dose reduction led to improvement of signs and symptoms in all 6 patients, suggesting a causal relationship with cysteamine administration. CONCLUSION: Cysteamine administration can be complicated by the development of skin, vascular, neurologic, muscular, and bone lesions. These lesions improve after cysteamine dose reduction. Doses >1.95 g/m(2)/day should be prescribed with great caution, but underdosing is not advocated.

Pharmacokinetics of enteric-coated cysteamine bitartrate in healthy adults: a pilot study.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Cysteamine bitartrate is taken lifelong, every 6 h and for the treatment of cystinosis. Recent studies using cysteamine for for other diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders adopt the same dosing regimen for cysteamine. Regular cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon) may cause upper gastrointestinal symptoms in some patients. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This is the only study that provides pharmacokinetic data for cysteamine delivered in an enteric-release preparation in normal subjects. EC-cysteamine is very well tolerated and does not cause increased gastrin concentrations, even at relatively high doses. EC-cysteamine at the higher dose results in better drug uptake as measured by Cmax and AUC and is more likely to be effective. AIMS: Cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon) is the approved treatment for cystinosis. Poor compliance and patient outcome may occur because the drug needs to be taken every 6 h and in some patients causes gastrointestinal symptoms due to hypergastrinaemia. A formulation of cysteamine requiring twice daily ingestion would improve the quality of life for these patients. This study compares the pharmacokinetics and gastrin production following cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated and cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated in normal healthy subjects. METHODS: Enteric-coated cysteamine was prepared. Following single doses of cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated 450 mg and cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated 450 mg and 900 mg, serial plasma cysteamine and gastrin concentrations were measured. Two subjects also received cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated 900 mg. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were recorded. RESULTS: Six healthy adults (mean age 20.7 years, range 18-24 years; mean weight 59.3 kg) received drug. All post-dose gastrin concentrations were within the normal range (<100 pg ml(-1)). The tmax following cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated (mean and SD is 75+/-19 min) was shorter than cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated (220+/-74 min) (P=0.001), but only the Cmax and AUC estimates following 900 mg cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated were significantly greater than any of the other preparations or doses (P<0.05). One patient had GI symptoms following both 900 mg cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated and cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated. CONCLUSION: Although patient numbers were low, single high doses of cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated were better tolerated than similar doses of cysteamine bitartrate non-enteric-coated in the healthy subjects and all had normal gastrin concentrations. The delayed tmax following cysteamine bitartrate enteric-coated suggested that the cysteamine was released enterically.

Long-term treatment of cystinosis in children with twice-daily cysteamine.

OBJECTIVE: Cystinosis causes renal and other organ failure. Treatment with 6-hourly cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon, Mylan, Morgantown, West Virginia) reduces intracellular cystine and the rate of organ deterioration. A recent study showed that an enteric-release cysteamine required less frequent daily dosing. This report describes the long-term use of enteric-coated (EC) cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon) in children with cystinosis. STUDY DESIGN: After a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of EC-cysteamine in children with cystinosis, 5 patients remained on twice-daily treatment. White blood cell cystine levels were measured 12 hours after ingestion every 4 to 8 weeks. These levels were then compared with the patient's previous 6-h post-dose levels taken while on regular cysteamine bitartrate before entering the study. Blood chemistry was also measured. RESULTS: Five children with cystinosis (mean age, 9 years; range, 8 to 17 years) who previously took cysteamine bitartrate (mean dose, 47 mg/kg body wt), received EC-cysteamine for 10 to 27 months (mean dose, 25 mg/kg body wt) and had mean white blood cell cystine levels of 0.77 and 0.71 nmol half-cystine/mg protein, respectively. During the study period, patients maintained adequate growth and there was no significant deterioration in renal or thyroid function. Two children were required to restart acid suppression after 6 months on EC-cysteamine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, twice-daily EC-cysteamine, given at approximately 60% of the previous daily dose of cysteamine bitartrate, was effective at maintaining white blood cell cystine levels within a satisfactory range. There was no significant deterioration in renal or thyroid function.

Twice-daily cysteamine bitartrate therapy for children with cystinosis.

OBJECTIVE: Cystinosis causes renal and other organ failure. Regular 6-hourly cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon; Mylan, Morgantown, West Virginia) reduces intracellular cystine and the rate of organ deterioration. A formulation of cysteamine requiring less frequent dosing may improve compliance and possibly patient outcome. METHODS: Enteric-release cysteamine was prepared. For a period of 1 month, patients received their regular cysteamine dose every 6 hours (stage I). The patients then underwent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies following washout periods using single-doses of cysteamine and enteric-release cysteamine (stage II). Finally, the patients commenced regular enteric-release cysteamine therapy (stage III). Weekly trough white blood cell (WBC) cystine levels were recorded. RESULTS: Seven children with cystinosis (mean age, 11.8 years; range, 8-17 years) who received cysteamine and enteric-release cysteamine (mean dose, 45 and 28.8 mg/kg body weight/day, respectively) had mean WBC cystine levels of 0.7+/-0.3 and 0.41+/-0.22 nmol half-cystine/mg protein in study stages I and III, respectively. Study stage II showed that the mean time (T(max)) to reach the maximum plasma cysteamine level (C(max)) was longer for enteric-release cysteamine than for cysteamine (176 minutes vs 60 minutes; P=.001), but the mean C(max) at the same dose was similar. Mean serum gastrin levels were similar after ingestion of cysteamine and enteric-release cysteamine. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-hour enteric-release cysteamine, given at approximately 60% of the previous daily dose of cysteamine, was effective in maintaining trough WBC cystine levels within a satisfactory range.

Pharmacokinetics of cysteamine bitartrate following gastrointestinal infusion.

AIMS: Although cysteamine was first used in the treatment of cystinosis in 1976 and approved by the FDA as cysteamine bitartrate (Cystagon) in 1994, surprisingly little pharmacological data are available for this compound. Cysteamine and its related drugs are currently being evaluated for the treatment of Huntington's and Parkinson's disease. The aim of te study was to understand the pharmacokinetics of cysteamine bitartrate following gastrointestinal infusion. METHOD: Cysteamine bitartrate was delivered through a naso-enteric catheter into the stomach (n = 8), small intestine (n = 8) and caecum (n = 4) of normal subjects. Plasma cysteamine concentrations were determined using LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: The rate and extent of drug absorption were assessed by comparing AUC(0, infinity), C(max) and t(max), among the gastrointestinal infusion sites. Total cysteamine exposure, expressed as area under the curve (AUC(0, infinity)) was greatest when the drug was infused into the small intestine (4331.3 +/- 1907.6 min x microM) followed by stomach (3901.9 +/- 1591.9 min x microM) and caecum (3141.4 +/- 1627.6 min x microM). Cysteamine infusion into the small intestine resulted in the most rapid rise to maximal plasma concentrations (t(max) = 21 +/- 0.56 min); t(max) was delayed to 50 +/- 26 min and 64 +/- 26 min after gastric and caecal infusion, respectively. The maximum cysteamine plasma concentration (C(max)) was reached after infusion of the drug into the small intestine (51 +/- 21 microM), which was higher than plasma C(max) concentrations after gastric (39 +/- 16 microM) and caecal infusion (23 +/- 15 microM). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic data generated help extend our understanding of cysteamine.

Understanding intestinal cysteamine bitartrate absorption.

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that a controlled-release preparation of cysteamine, with fewer daily administrations, would improve the quality of life for patients with cystinosis. STUDY DESIGN: A specifically designed nasoenteric tube was used to administer cysteamine directly into the stomach, small intestine (SI) and colon and serial plasma cysteamine, serum gastrin and leukocyte cystine levels were measured. RESULTS: Eight control subjects (mean age 23.2 years) and 6 subjects with cystinosis (mean age 15.2 years) were studied. Cysteamine absorption (maximum concentration and area under the curve of the concentration-time gradient) was greater from the SI than stomach or cecum (P < .01). Leukocyte cystine depletion was greater after delivery of cysteamine into the SI than stomach or cecum; this effect was associated with the plasma cysteamine maximum concentration and area under the curve (P < .001 and < .02, respectively). Gastrin levels were not affected by site of drug delivery and were elevated only in patients with cystinosis with gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The absorption of cysteamine and the effect of this agent on leukocyte cystine depletion are more profound after SI administration. Enteric-coated cysteamine, targeted for SI release, may require fewer daily dosages. Not all patients with cystinosis require acid-suppression therapy.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cysteamine bitartrate in paediatric nephropathic cystinosis patients.

AIMS: Cysteamine is used to reduce tissue cystine content in patients suffering from nephropathic cystinosis. The objectives of the current study were to investigate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cysteamine bitartrate in children and young adults with nephropathic cystinosis. METHODS: Cysteamine bitartrate was administered to 11 cystinosis patients at their regular dose level in a single-dose, open-label, steady-state study. Blood samples were collected and analysed for plasma cysteamine and white blood cell cystine content and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters estimated by NONMEM analysis using a linked pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. RESULTS: Cysteamine was rapidly cleared from the plasma (mean CL/F = 32.3 ml min(-1) kg(-1), range = 17.3-52.2), appeared to be extensively distributed (mean Vss/F = 15.1 l, range 2.7-32.3) and exhibited a mean Tmax of 1.4 h. White blood cell cystine content post-dosing was significantly decreased compared with pre- and post-dose values (average decrement approximately 47%). A counter-clockwise hysteresis was noted in all patients, suggestive of a lag time (mean Tlag = 0.44 h, range 0.22-0.92) between drug concentration and effect. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study establish that cysteamine is rapidly cleared from the plasma but that an every 6 h dosing interval adequately maintains white blood cell cystine content below the target of 1 nmol cystine per mg protein.

The evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal disease in children with cystinosis receiving cysteamine.

OBJECTIVES: Cysteamine prevents organ damage in children with cystinosis, but may cause gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. In this study we evaluated the nature of GI disease, and the value of omeprazole in controlling GI symptoms in these children. STUDY DESIGN: Upper GI disease was evaluated with endoscopy, gastrin levels, and acid secretion studies after oral administration of cysteamine, before and after 16 weeks of therapy with omeprazole. A symptom score was devised. RESULTS: Eleven children (mean age, 5.7 years) were studied. After cysteamine ingestion, before and after omeprazole therapy, the mean maximum acid output was significantly higher than the mean basal acid output. The maximum acid output was measured within 60 minutes of cysteamine ingestion and was reduced by omeprazole therapy (P<.01). The mean peak gastrin level was 30 minutes postcysteamine and was higher than baseline (P<.01). The initial mean symptom score (maximum score, 14) was 6.9 and fell to 0.7 (P<.0001) after 16 weeks of omeprazole therapy. At endoscopy, two children had diffuse gastric nodularity, and nearly all had cystine crystal deposits. CONCLUSIONS: GI symptoms in children with cystinosis receiving cysteamine are often acid-mediated and improve with omeprazole. Cystine crystals were detected in the GI tract and may signify inadequate treatment with cysteamine.