Hypercapnia in COPD Patients Undergoing Endobronchial Ultrasound under Local Anaesthesia and Analgosedation: A Prospective Controlled Study Using Continuous Transcutaneous Capnometry.

BACKGROUND: Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) in analgosedation causes alveolar hypoventilation and hypercapnia, the more so if patients suffer from COPD. Nonetheless, neither is capnometry part of standard monitoring nor is there evidence on how long patients should be monitored after sedation. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the impact of COPD on hypercapnia during FB with endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) in sedation and how the periprocedural monitoring should be adapted. METHODS: Two cohorts of consecutive patients - with advanced and without COPD - with the indication for FB with EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in analgosedation received continuous transcutaneous capnometry (ptcCO2) before, during, and for 60 min after the sedation with midazolam and alfentanil. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-six patients with advanced COPD and 44 without COPD were included. The mean examination time was 26 ± 9 min. Patients with advanced COPD had a higher peak ptcCO2 (53.7 ± 7.1 vs. 46.8 ± 4.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and mean ptcCO2 (49.5 ± 6.8 vs. 44.0 ± 4.4 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Thirty-six percent of all patients reached the maximum hypercapnia after FB in the recovery room (8 ± 11 min). Patients with COPD needed more time to recover to normocapnia (22 ± 24 vs. 7 ± 11 min, p < 0.001). They needed a nasopharyngeal tube more often (28 vs. 11%, p < 0.001). All patients recovered from hypercapnia within 60 min after FB. No intermittent ventilation manoeuvres were needed. CONCLUSION: A relevant proportion of patients reached their peak-pCO2 after the end of intervention. We recommend using capnometry at least for patients with known COPD. Flexible EBUS in analgosedation can be safely performed in patients with advanced COPD. For patients with advanced COPD, a postprocedural observation time of 60 min was sufficient.

Rationale and design of PASSAT - patients' satisfaction with local or general anaesthesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with a non-randomised side arm.

BACKGROUND: Although general anaesthesia (GA) with one-lung ventilation is the current standard of care, minor thoracoscopic surgery, i.e. treatment of pleural effusions, biopsies and small peripheral pulmonary wedge resections, can also be performed using local anaesthesia (LA), analgosedation and spontaneous breathing. Whilst the feasibility and safety of LA have been demonstrated, its impact on patient satisfaction remains unclear. Most studies evaluating patient satisfaction lack control groups or do not meet psychometric criteria. We report the design of the PASSAT trial (PAtientS' SATisfaction in thoracic surgery - general vs. local anaesthesia), a randomised controlled trial with a non-randomised side arm. METHODS: Patients presenting for minor thoracoscopic surgery and physical eligibility for GA and LA are randomised to surgery under GA (control group) or LA (intervention group). Those who refuse to be randomised are asked to attend the study on the basis of their own choice of anaesthesia (preference arm) and will be analysed separately. The primary endpoint is patient satisfaction according to a psychometrically validated questionnaire; secondary endpoints are complication rates, capnometry, actual costs and cost effectiveness. The study ends after inclusion of 54 patients in each of the two randomised study groups. DISCUSSION: The PASSAT study is the first randomised controlled trial to systematically assess patients' satisfaction depending on LA or GA. The study follows an interdisciplinary approach, and its results may also be applicable to other surgical disciplines. It is also the first cost study based on randomised samples. Comparison of the randomised and the non-randomised groups may contribute to satisfaction research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00013661 . Registered on 23 March 2018.

Management of Spontaneous Pneumothorax and Post-Interventional Pneumothorax: German S3 Guideline.

In Germany, 10,000 cases of spontaneous pneumothorax are treated inpatient every year. The German Society for Thoracic Surgery, in co-operation with the German Society for Pulmonology, the German Radiological Society, and the German Society of Internal Medicine has developed an S3 guideline on spontaneous pneumothorax and post-interventional pneumothorax moderated by the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies. METHOD: Based on the source guideline of the British Thoracic Society (2010) for spontaneous pneumothorax, a literature search on spontaneous pneumothorax was carried out from 2008 onwards, for post-interventional pneumothorax from 1960 onwards. Evidence levels according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (2011) were assigned to the relevant studies found. Recommendations according to grade (A: "we recommend"/"we do not recommend," B: "we suggest"/"we do not suggest") were determined in 3 consensus conferences by the nominal group process. RESULTS: The algorithms for primary and secondary pneumothorax differ in the indication for CT scan as well as in the indication for chest drainage application and video-assisted thoracic surgery. Indication for surgery is recommended individually taking into account the risk of recurrence, life circumstances, patient preferences, and procedure risks. For some forms of secondary pneumothorax, a reserved indication for surgery is recommended. Therapy of post-interventional spontaneous pneumothorax is similar to that of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. DISCUSSION: The recommendations of the S3 Guideline provide assistance in managing spontaneous pneumothorax and post-interventional pneumothorax. Whether this will affect existing deviant diagnostic and therapeutic measures will be demonstrated by future epidemiological studies.

Perioperative outcome after open and thoracoscopic segmentectomy for the treatment of malignant and benign pulmonary lesions: a propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcome of patients receiving anatomic segmentectomy either by open surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). To assess the short-term morbidity of the procedure itself, lung cancer patients in all stages as well as patients with pulmonary metastases and benign lesions scheduled for segmental resection were enrolled in this study. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 445 consecutive patients that underwent segmentectomy either by VATS (n=233) or thoracotomy (n=212) was performed. A propensity-matched analysis was conducted based on age, gender, smoking history, histology, tumor size, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and history of previous pulmonary resections. The matched sample included two groups of 140 patients each. RESULTS: Both study groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, smoking history, diagnosis, tumor size, pulmonary function and history of previous pulmonary resections. VATS segmentectomy was associated with decreased length of stay (7.4 vs. 9.5 days, P<0.001), drainage treatment time (4.7 vs. 5.9 days, P=0.012) and severe postoperative complications (1.4% vs. 7.1%, P=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: VATS segmentectomy is safe and effective for the treatment of benign and malignant pulmonary lesions. Compared with open thoracotomy, it is associated with shorter hospitalization time and decreased number of severe complications. The preservation of functional lung tissue, combined with a minimally invasive approach, make VATS segmentectomy highly suitable for patients with reduced pulmonary function or severe comorbidities.

Management of Spontaneous Pneumothorax and Postinterventional Pneumothorax: German S3-Guideline. / S3-Leitlinie: Diagnostik und Therapie von Spontanpneumothorax und postinterventionellem Pneumothorax.

In Germany, 10,000 cases of spontaneous pneumothorax are treated inpatient every year. The German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT), in co-operation with the German Society for Pulmonology (DGP), the German Radiological Society (DRG) and the German Society of Internal Medicine (DGIM) has developed an S3 guideline on spontaneous pneumothorax and postinterventional pneumothorax moderated by the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF). METHOD: Based on the source guideline of the British Thoracic Society (BTS2010) for spontaneous pneumothorax, a literature search on spontaneous pneumothorax was carried out from 2008 onwards, for post-interventional pneumothorax from 1960 onwards. Evidence levels according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (2011) were assigned to the relevant studies found. Recommendations according to GRADE (A: "we recommend"/"we do not recommend", B: "we suggest"/"we do not suggest") were determined in three consensus conferences by the nominal group process. RESULTS: The algorithms for primary and secondary pneumothorax differ in the indication for CT scan as well as in the indication for chest drainage application and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Indication for surgery is recommended individually taking into account the risk of recurrence, life circumstances, patient preferences and procedure risks. For some forms of secondary pneumothorax, a reserved indication for surgery is recommended. Therapy of postinterventional spontaneous pneumothorax is similar to that of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. DISCUSSION: The recommendations of the S3 Guideline provide assistance in managing spontaneous pneumothorax and post-interventional pneumothorax. Whether this will affect existing deviant diagnostic and therapeutic measures will be demonstrated by future epidemiological studies.

Spontaneous Pneumothorax.

BACKGROUND: Few reliable data are available on the epidemiology and treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. We studied the sex and age distribution, frequency of hospitalization, mortality, and conservative versus surgical care of this condition in Germany in order to draw well-founded conclusions about its in-hospital diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: Data from all patients aged 10 or older who were hospitalized in the period 2011-2015 with a main discharge diagnosis of pneumothorax of neither traumatic nor iatrogenic origin were retrieved from the German Federal Statistical Office. Because of their source, all data were based on case numbers rather than patient numbers. RESULTS: During the period of the study, there were 52 738 admissions with the main diagnosis of spontaneous pneumothorax, corresponding to an annual frequency of hospitalization of 14.3 per 100 000 persons per year (95% confidence interval, 14.0 to 14.5). Men were more frequently affected than women. The lethality and in-hospital mortality of this condition (≤ 0.08% and ≤ 0.3%, respectively) were low among persons aged 15 to 45, but markedly higher in persons over age 90 (9.4% and 15.9%, respectively). The frequency of accompanying pulmonary diagnoses also rose with age. Computerized tomography (CT) was performed in 38.9-54.6% of hospitalizations, depending on age. Monitoring on an intensive care unit was carried out in 36% of cases. More than one-quarter of cases involved surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: The danger to life and the likelihood of an accompanying pulmonary diagnosis are both low up to age 45. Treatment on an intensive care unit and computerized tomography of the chest should be performed only for strict indications in patients under age 45. The pathophysiological basis of the differing patterns of illness depending on age and sex requires further investigation.

Preserving middle lobe to improve lung function in non-small-cell lung cancer.

When a lung tumor arises in segment 6, the close anatomical relationship to the middle lobe bronchus may make a lower bilobectomy necessary. Sleeve lobectomy may be an alternative. These procedures were compared retrospectively in 36 patients operated on between January 2005 and December 2006 with non-small-cell lung cancer (stage I-IIIB) of the right lower lobe. Sleeve lobectomy was performed in 21 patients and bilobectomy in 15 (41%). Preoperative lung function was comparable in both groups. Radical resection was achieved in 34/36 patients. Operation time was 121 min for sleeve lobectomy and 144 min for bilobectomy. Chest tubes were removed after 5 days in both groups. Postoperative lung function was better after sleeve lobectomy than bilobectomy (forced expiratory volume in 1st sec: 78% vs. 69%). Preservation of the middle lobe by sleeve lobectomy is feasible. There was no evidence that this resection was less radical, and complication rates were similar in both groups.

Inhalation with Tobramycin to improve healing of tracheobronchial reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Sleeve resections were introduced to preserve lung function in patients with limited pulmonary reserve. Ischaemia and infection of the distal part of the anastomosis is the leading cause of bronchial anastomotic leakage. We have learned from our experience in lung transplantation that inhalation with Tobramycin helps prevent anastomotic insufficiency. We would like to present our experience in patients with tracheobronchial sleeve and prophylactic Tobramycin inhalation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 114 patient records, between 01.01.2005 and 31.12.2006, where a bronchial anastomosis (patients with tracheal resection were excluded) was performed. All patients received Tobramycin inhalation (2 x 80 mg) for 7 days. Data analysed were; length of chest tube drainage in days, complications, morbidity and hospital mortality. RESULTS: In 694 patients, an anatomic resection was performed. Of these, 114 (16%) were sleeve resections and 63 (9%) pneumonectomies. In 21 women and 93 men, between 25 and 84 years old, sleeve lobectomy was performed 104 times and carinal resection 10 times. A preoperative neoadjuvant therapy had been given in 26%. Radical (R0) resection was possible in 94%. The duration of the operation was between 83 and 225 min (median: 127 min). Chest tubes were removed on average after 6 days. Patients were discharged after 11 days. The rate of bronchial anastomotic leakage was 4.4%. There were two patients with postoperative respiratory insufficiency and mechanical ventilation, two patients with technical failure required early correction of the suture and one patient with a necrosis of the anastomosis. Thirty-day hospital mortality was 2.6% (3/114). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing experience with sleeve resection has reduced the rate of pneumonectomy below 10%, although a number of the patients had received neoadjuvant therapy and the carinal resection rate of necrosis and infection of the anastomosis was low. We therefore recommend use of local antibiotic inhalation after sleeve resection.