Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 22(1): 70-7, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21158932

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the biological and technical complication rates of fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with end abutments or cantilever extensions on teeth (FDP-tt/cFDP-tt) on implants (FDP-ii/cFDP-ii) and tooth-implant-supported (FDP-ti/cFDP-ti) in patients treated for chronic periodontitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: from a cohort of 392 patients treated between 1978 and 2002 by graduate students, 199 were re-examined in 2005. Of these, 84 patients had received ceramo-metal FDPs (six groups). RESULTS: at the re-evaluation, the mean age of the patients was 62 years (36.2-83.4). One hundred and seventy-five FDPs were seated (82 FDP-tt, 9 FDP-ii, 20 FDP-ti, 39 cFDP-tt, 15 cFDP-ii, 10 cFDP-ti). The mean observation time was 11.3 years; 21 FDPs were lost, and 46 technical and 50 biological complications occurred. Chances for the survival of the three groups of FDPs with end abutments were very high (risk for failure 2.8%, 0%, 5.6%). The probability to remain without complications and/or failure was 70.3%, 88.9% and 74.7% in FDPs with end abutments, but 49.8-25% only in FDPs with extensions at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: in patients treated for chronic periodontitis and provided with ceramo-metal FDPs, high survival rates, especially for FDPs with end abutments, can be expected. The incidence rates of any negative events were increased drastically in the three groups with extension cFDPs (tt, ii, ti). Strategic decisions in the choice of a particular FDP design and the choice of teeth/implants as abutments appear to influence the risks for complications to be expected with fixed reconstruction. If possible, extensions on tooth abutments should be avoided or used only after a cautious clinical evaluation of all options.


Assuntos
Periodontite Crônica/complicações , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária/efeitos adversos , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante/efeitos adversos , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Prótese Parcial Fixa/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Periodontite Crônica/terapia , Coroas , Dente Suporte , Cárie Dentária/etiologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Ligas Metalo-Cerâmicas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peri-Implantite/etiologia , Periodontite Periapical/etiologia , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
2.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 21(5): 550-7, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20443806

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the biological and technical complication rates of single crowns on vital teeth (SC-V), endodontically treated teeth without post and core (SC-E), with a cast post and core (SC-PC) and on implants (SC-I). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 392 patients with chronic periodontitis treated and documented by graduate students during the period from 1978 to 2002, 199 were reexamined during 2005 for this retrospective cohort study, and 64 of these patients were treated with SCs. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival functions and event rates per 100 years of object-time. Poisson regression was used to compare the four groups of crowns with respect to the incidence rate ratio of failures, and failures and complications combined over 10 years and the entire observation period. RESULTS: Forty-one (64%) female and 23 (36%) male patients participated in the reexamination. At the time of seating the crowns, the mean patient age was 46.8 (range 24-66.3) years. One hundred and sixty-eight single unit crowns were incorporated. Their mean follow-up time was 11.8 (range 0.8-26.4) years. During the time of observation, 22 biological and 11 technical complications occurred; 19 SC were lost. The chance for SC-V (56) to remain free of any failure or complication was 89.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.1-95.4) after 10 years, 85.8% (95% CI 66-94.5) for SC-E (34), 75.9% for SC-PC (39), (95% CI 58.8-86.7) and 66.2% (95% CI 45.1-80.7) for SC-I (39). Over 10 years, 95% of SC-I remained free of failure and demonstrated a cumulative incidence of failure or complication of 34%. Compared with SC-E, SC-I were 3.5 times more likely to yield failures or complications and SC-PC failed 1.7 times more frequently than did SC-E. SC-V had the lowest rate of failures or complications over the 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: While SCs on vital teeth have the best prognosis, those on endodontically treated teeth have a slightly poorer prognosis over 10 years. Crowns on teeth with post and cores and implant-supported SCs displayed the highest incidence of failures and complications.


Assuntos
Coroas/efeitos adversos , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Periodontite/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Periodontite/diagnóstico por imagem , Distribuição de Poisson , Técnica para Retentor Intrarradicular/efeitos adversos , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...