Non-interventional observational study broadens positive benefit-risk assessment of an immunomodulating herbal remedy in the common cold.

Background: The unique extract of a mixture of Baptisiae tinctoriae radix, Echinaceae pallidae/purpureae radix and Thujae occidentalis herba alleviates the typical symptoms of the common cold and shortens the duration of the disease. Purpose: The risk-benefit ratio of a concentrated formulation of this herbal extract was investigated under everyday conditions. Study design: Pharmacy-based, non-interventional, multicenter, open, uncontrolled study registered at DRKS00011068. Methods: For 10 days, patients completed a diary questionnaire rating the severity of each common cold symptom on a 10-point scale. For evaluation, symptoms were combined into the scores "overall severity", "rhinitis", "bronchitis" and "general symptoms". Cox models were used to evaluate the influence of covariates on the time of stable improvement. Results: In total 955 patients (12 to 90 years) were analyzed; 85% assessed the efficacy as good or very good. Response (improvement of the overall severity by at least 50%) was reached at median day 5 (95% CImedian 5-5). General symptoms abated faster than the other complaints. The percentage of predominantly moderate or severe symptoms to predominantly mild or absent symptoms reversed on day 3.9 (interpolation). Results of adolescents and adults did not differ (p = .6013; HR = 0.918). Concomitant medication did not boost the effect of the herbal remedy. Early start of treatment of the cold accelerated the recovery (p = .0486; HR = 0.814). Thirty-four cases of adverse events were self-recorded in the diaries; none of them were serious. The tolerability was assessed as "good or very good" by 98% of the patients. Conclusion: The benefit-risk assessment of this herbal extract clearly remains positive. This non-interventional study accords with and shows transferability of the results of previous placebo-controlled studies with this extract in a real-life setting.

Intra-Seasonal Initiation of the SQ-Standardised Grass Allergy Immunotherapy Tablet Routinely Applied by Allergy Specialists and General Practitioners with Experience in Treatment of Allergy: A Non-Interventional Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Intra-seasonal start of treatment with the SQ® grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet (GRAZAX®, ALK, Denmark) has been previously demonstrated to be well-tolerated. The objective of our study was to investigate the tolerability of intra-seasonal start of treatment comparing patients treated by allergists and general practitioners experienced in treatment of allergy (GPs). METHODS: In a non-interventional, open-label, observational study, data on intra-seasonal start with the SQ® grass SLIT tablet were recorded in patients treated by allergists and GPs in Germany. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded by the physicians at first administration and during the 1-3-month observation period. The tablets taken and any AEs were recorded by the patients in diaries for the first 14 days. RESULTS: Treatment with the SQ® grass SLIT tablet was started in 198 patients, and in 179 intra-seasonal (allergists: 140, GPs: 39) and 19 post-seasonal; average treatment period was 47 days. AEs related to intra-seasonal start were reported in 43.6% of patients; no relevant differences between allergists and GPs were observed. In the subgroup of GPs, patients were younger (p = 0.0191), had more frequently asthma (p = 0.0043), more patients used symptomatic medication in the previous pollen season (p = 0.0198) and were more frequently treated for other diseases (p = 0.0467). In the allergists subgroup, more diagnostic allergy tests were applied (p < 0.0001) with less anti-allergic premedication at first administration (p = 0.0026). CONCLUSION: The intra-seasonal start of treatment with the SQ® grass SLIT tablet in patients routinely treated by allergists or GPs with experience in treatment of allergy was well-tolerated, although patient characteristics were different with respect to age, frequency of asthma and concomitant allergies, use of symptomatic medication in the previous grass pollen season and concomitant treatment of other diseases. The safety profile from a previous placebo-controlled clinical trial and data from a previous real-life study on intra-seasonal start performed by allergists were confirmed.

[Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit eines homöopathischen Komplexmittels (Sinusitis Hevert SL) bei akuter, unkomplizierter Rhinosinusitis: Eine multizentrische, randomisierte, doppelblinde, placebokontrollierte Studie an erwachsenen Patienten].

Hintergrund: In der vorliegenden Studie wurden die Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit des homöopathischen Arzneimittels Sinusitis Hevert SL an Patienten mit akuter Rhinosinusitis untersucht. Methoden: In einer randomisierten, placebokontrollierten klinischen Studie wurden 314 Patienten mit bis zu 3 Tagen bestehenden Symptomen, leichtem bis moderatem Gesichtsschmerz und einem Major Rhinosinusitis Symptom Score (MRSS) ≥ 8 und ≤ 14 für 15 Tage (Tag 0 erster Arztbesuch plus 14 Tage Behandlung) eingeschlossen und mit Sinusitis Hevert SL oder Placebo behandelt. Den primären Endpunkt bildeten die Responderrate im MRSS (Reduktion ≥ 50%) bei der Abschlussvisite sowie die Rate der Remissionen (komplettes Abklingen aller 5 Hauptsymptome). Sekundäre Zielkriterien bildeten die Einschätzung der Wirksamkeit durch den Prüfer (auf einer 4-Punkte-Skala) und der Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 20 German Adapted Version (SNOT-20 GAV; Selbsterhebung durch die Patienten). Ergebnisse: 314 Patienten wurden in die Studie eingeschlossen. Davon wurden 308 mit der Studienmedikation behandelt: 153 mit Sinusitis Hevert SL und 155 mit Placebo. 265 Patienten schlossen die Studie vollständig und valide ab (Valid Completers). Die MRSSpat-Responderrate aller Patienten war für Sinusitis Hevert SL nicht signifikant besser (85,6% vs. 80,6%; p = 0,243), die Rate der Remissionen war mit 31,4% für Sinusitis Hevert SL und 37,4% für Placebo in beiden Gruppen nicht signifikant unterschiedlich (p = 0,2641). In der sekundären Completer-Analyse zeigte sich eine signifikante Differenz der Responderraten von 92,1% versus 83,5% zugunsten von Sinusitis Hevert SL (p = 0,032). Weiter war die Zeit bis zur Verbesserung der Rhinorrhoe signifikant kürzer (4,0 vs. 6,0 Tage; p = 0,040). Vor allem relevante nasale Symptome des SNOT-20 und die Lebensqualität verbesserten sich unter Behandlung mit Sinusitis Hevert SL signifikant deutlicher. Schlussfolgerungen: Es zeigte sich in dieser Studie bei akuter Rhinosinusitis und hoher Placebo-Ansprechrate keine Überlegenheit für Sinusitis Hevert SL in der Gesamtresponder- und Remissionsrate. Es fand sich ein Nutzen von Sinusitis Hevert SL in der Auswertung der Valid Completers für die Response sowie für spezifische Verbesserungen klinisch relevanter Symptome und die Abheilungsgeschwindigkeit der akuten Rhinosinusitis bei guter Verträglichkeit.

Tolerability of an Immunologically Enhanced Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Preparation in Patients Treated with Concomitant Allergy Immunotherapy: A Non-Interventional Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: For causal treatment by allergy immunotherapy (AIT) a single or few allergen products for the clinically most relevant allergens are applied to treat multiple allergies, but few data on the tolerability of multiple AIT applications are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to investigate safety and tolerability in patients treated by subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and concomitant SCIT or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) products. METHODS: In a non-interventional, observational study in Germany treatment of patients with a primary SCIT and concomitant AIT (SCIT or SLIT) was documented during the first 4 months of treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded by the physicians and by patients in diaries, and coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). RESULTS: Three hundred and seven patients were treated with the primary SCIT by 79 allergists, and 271 received a concomitant AIT. AEs were reported in 92 (33.9%) patients and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in 63 (23.2%) patients related to the primary SCIT and in 69 (25.5%) to the concomitant AIT; six (2.2%) patients discontinued due to ADRs. ADRs were mild or moderate in 40 (14.8%) patients, severe in 23 (8.5%), and serious in one patient. The most frequent reactions were local swelling and pruritus. Overall tolerability was assessed as 'good' or 'very good' by 95.6% of patients and 96.7% of physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with data from a large previous study no increase in the frequency of ADRs in real life or change in the tolerability profile was observed for SCIT with concomitant SCIT or SLIT.

Health-Related Quality of Life During Routine Treatment with the SQ-Standardised Grass Allergy Immunotherapy Tablet: A Non-Interventional Observational Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) with the SQ(®) grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-tablet has been shown to be efficacious, well-tolerated and to improve disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in controlled clinical trials. The aim of our study was to investigate HRQoL in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis routinely treated with the SLIT-tablet and taking symptomatic medication as needed compared with patients treated only with symptomatic medication. METHODS: In a non-interventional, open-label study, patients treated with the SLIT-tablet were observed for about 12 months compared with patients only symptomatically treated. Patients assessed their HRQoL with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and the Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in the grass pollen seasons (GPS) at baseline (GPS1, HRQoL1), after GPS1 (HRQoL2) and in the following GPS (GPS2, HRQoL3). Tolerability, compliance, symptoms and medication use were assessed in the SLIT-tablet group by the physician. RESULTS: Overall, data were analysed in 576 patients. Mean differences (±SD) in overall scores for HRQoL3 versus HRQoL1 (186 patients) of SF-12 were +11.4 ± 16.8 (SLIT-tablet) and -3.4 ± 15.7 (symptomatic medication), (p < 0.0001), and of RQLQ -1.31 ± 1.07 and +0.10 ± 0.74 (p < 0.001), and for HRQoL3 versus HRQoL2 (238 patients) of SF-12 -1.6 ± 15.3 and -10.0 ± 14.1 (p = 0.0003), and of RQLQ +0.22 ± 1.29 and +1.24 ± 1.30 (p < 0.0001). Tolerability and adherence for the SLIT-tablet were comparable with data of other non-interventional studies. CONCLUSIONS: Routine treatment with the SQ(®) grass SLIT-tablet resulted in clear improvements in disease-specific and general quality of life, while no improvements were observed in patients treated only symptomatically.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravesically administered 0.1% oxybutynin hydrochloride solution in adult patients with neurogenic bladder: A randomized, prospective, controlled multi-center trial.

AIMS: To verify the efficacy, safety and tolerability of intravesical administration of 0.1% oxybutynin hydrochloride compared to its oral administration for treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in a randomized, prospective, controlled, open-label, multi-center trial in 35 adult patients. METHODS: NDO was confirmed within the previous 24 months by urodynamic studies (UDS). Group 1 (n = 18) received 10 ml 0.1% oxybutynin hydrochloride intravesically three times per day and group 2 (n = 17) 5 mg oxybutynin hydrochloride orally three times per day for a period of 28 days. Primary efficacy criterion was the change in the maximum bladder capacity between the beginning of the study and after 4 weeks as assessed by UDS. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were collected and an evaluation of anticholinergic effects was conducted. RESULTS: The increase in maximum bladder capacity was 117 ml with intravesical application (P = 0.0002) versus 18 ml with the oral application (P = 0.51). The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0086). ADR were reported by 10 (55.6%) of patients with intravesical administration, and by 14 (82.4%) of patients with oral administration. Significant differences in favor of the intravesical application were observed in ADR affecting vision (1/10 vs. 9/14), gastrointestinal tract (8/10 vs. 14/14), nervous system (2/10 vs. 8/14), and skin and subcutis (1/10 vs. 6/14). No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of intravesical 0.1% oxybutynin hydrochloride in the treatment of NDO with respect to the increase in maximum bladder capacity. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:582-588, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Tolerability of the SQ-standardised grass sublingual immunotherapy tablet in patients treated with concomitant allergy immunotherapy: a non-interventional observational study.

BACKGROUND: The majority of allergic patients are poly-sensitized. For causal treatment by allergy immunotherapy (AIT) a single or few allergen products containing the clinically most relevant allergens are applied, but few data on tolerability of multiple application of AIT is available. The aim of our study was to investigate safety and tolerability in patients who started treatment by sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with the standardised SQ(®) grass SLIT-tablet and were treated with concomitant AIT products. METHODS: In a non-interventional, open-label, observational study in Germany treatment of patients with the SQ(®) grass SLIT-tablet and concomitant AIT (SCIT or SLIT) was documented between January 2012 and January 2014. Patients were followed at visits at first administration of the SQ(®) grass SLIT-tablet and after 1-3 months of treatment. Tolerability of the treatment with the SQ(®) grass SLIT-tablet and concomitant AIT were assessed by the physician and administration of AIT and adverse events (AEs) were recorded by the patients in diaries. AEs and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were coded by using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. RESULTS: In total, 181 patients were documented by 48 allergists and 160 patients treated with a concomitant AIT (SCIT 130, SLIT 30). AEs were reported in 58 (36.3 %) patients with concomitant AIT, and AEs considered related with the SQ(®) grass SLIT-tablet in 49 (30.6 %) and with concomitant AIT in 18 (11.3 %) patients. Treatment was discontinued due to ADRs in 12 (7.5 %) patients and severity of ADRs was assessed mild or moderate in 29 (18.1 %), and severe in 20 (12.5 %) patients. Most common reactions were localised at the application site of the SQ(®) grass SLIT-tablet as oral pruritus, throat irritation, oedema mouth and paraesthesia oral; no serious ADRs were reported. Overall tolerability of the SQ(®) grass SLIT-tablet if given with concomitant AIT was assessed as "good" or "very good" by 91.0 % of patients and 91.6 % of physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to data from previous studies no increase in frequency of AEs or change in the tolerability profile was observed when SLIT with the SQ(®) grass SLIT-tablet was administered with concomitant SCIT or SLIT.

Efficacy of black cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa) medicines for treatment of menopausal symptoms - comments on major statements of the Cochrane Collaboration report 2012 "black cohosh (Cimicifuga spp.) for menopausal symptoms (review)".

Menopausal symptoms management with high-quality plant extracts from Actaea (Cimicifuga. racemosa rootstock is well-established. Efficacy and safety are supported by research and clinical trials since several decades and backed up by official monographs. However, the recent published Cochrane review on black cohosh neglects major evidence for beneficial effects. The authors' negative conclusions are questionable and call for reply and clarification. Our careful reconsideration of all appropriate placebo-controlled clinical studies reveals a standardized mean difference of 0.385 in favor of black cohosh (p < 0.0001).

Safety and tolerability of an intra-seasonal initiation of the SQ-standardised grass allergy immunotherapy tablet: a non-interventional observational study investigating the feasibility during routine administration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For specific immunotherapy to pollen allergy, a pre-seasonal start of treatment is recommended by international guidelines. In a placebo-controlled clinical trial with adults, an intra-seasonal start of therapy with the SQ-standardised grass allergy immunotherapy tablet (AIT) was well-tolerated. The objective of our study was to investigate the feasibility of an intra-seasonal start of grass AIT administered during routine treatment by practising allergists. METHODS: In a multicentre, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, non-interventional observational study, data on routine treatment with grass AIT were recorded in patients who started administration of tablets within the 2010 grass pollen season in Germany. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded by the physician at visits for the first administration in the clinic and at the end of the 1- to 3-month observation period. AEs and daily administration of the tablet were recorded by the patients in diaries for the first 14 days. Treatment satisfaction, global tolerability and perceived effect of treatment were assessed by the patient and physician at the end of the study. RESULTS: A total of 662 patients were treated with 1 tablet daily by 286 physicians. Grass AIT was started intra-seasonally in 620 patients and post-season in 42. The average treatment period was 51.6 days. AEs were recorded in 52.1 % of all patients and in 35.6 % at first administration, with throat irritation (21.3 %), paraesthesia oral (19.9 %), oral pruritus (14.0 %) and ear pruritus (10.3 %) being the most frequent AEs related to grass AIT. The intensity of the AEs was assessed as mild or moderate in 42.1 % of patients and severe in 8.0 %; AEs related to grass AIT were classified as serious in two patients. Grass AIT was discontinued due to AEs in 7.7 % of patients. Diaries were evaluable for 77.0 % of patients; the average rate of patients with AEs decreased continuously from 44.7 % (day 1) to 26.9 % (day 14) and the average daily rate of patients who forgot to take their tablet was about 5 %. Overall tolerability was assessed by 87.2 % of patients and 91.4 % physicians as "very good" or "good" and effectiveness of treatment was assessed as "very good" or "good" in 81.4 % of patients and 85.8 % of physicians. More than 90 % of patients and physicians were satisfied with the treatment. CONCLUSION: The tolerability data for an intra-seasonal start of grass AIT during routine treatment confirm the safety profile from the previous controlled trial. Tolerability was assessed as good in combination with high satisfaction with the treatment and compliance.

Pharmacokinetics of intravesical versus oral oxybutynin in healthy adults: results of an open label, randomized, prospective clinical study.

PURPOSE: We investigated the pharmacokinetics of intravesical oxybutynin and discuss the clinical implications of the results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an open label, randomized, 3-period crossover clinical study in 20 healthy adults. In periods 1 and 2 subjects received a single dose of 10 mg oxybutynin HCl solution intravesically or a 5 mg tablet orally. Period 3 comprised repeat intravesical applications (7 doses) of 10 mg oxybutynin HCl. Enantioselective concentrations of oxybutynin and N-desethyloxybutynin were quantified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods, analyzed by descriptive statistics and compared using the average bioequivalence approach. RESULTS: Systemic exposure to racemic oxybutynin after intravesical administration was significantly greater, yielding 294% (90% CI 211-408) of that after oral intake of immediate release preparations, as measured by the dose normalized area under the plasma concentration time curve. In contrast, systemic exposure to racemic N-desethyloxybutynin reached only 21% (90% CI 15-29). The area under the plasma concentration time curve ratio of N-desethyloxybutynin to oxybutynin was 14-fold decreased for intravesical administration. After intravesical multidose administration, the cumulation of oxybutynin (1.3-fold) and N-desethyloxybutynin (1.6-fold) was weak, absorption was prolonged and apparent elimination half-lives were longer. The study medication was well tolerated with a third of participants reporting anticholinergic adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence of significantly higher bioavailability of intravesical vs oral administration of oxybutynin due to circumvention of the intestinal first pass metabolism. Given the high efficacy and decreased rate of adverse effects, intravesical oxybutynin should be considered in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction who do not tolerate oral administration or in whom oral preparations fail to improve detrusor overactivity.

Efficacy and safety of a combination herbal medicinal product containing Tropaeoli majoris herba and Armoraciae rusticanae radix for the prophylactic treatment of patients with respiratory tract diseases: a randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this ICH-GCP study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a prophylactic administration of a combination herbal medicinal product (CHMP) in two dosages compared to placebo with respect to the incidence of new occurring infections of the respiratory tract (RTI). Clinical experience of prophylactic treatment of respiratory tract infections with the marketed CHMP containing horseradish root (Armoraciae rusticanae radix) and nasturtium (Tropaeoli majoris herba) has existed for decades. METHODS: The study was performed as a phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. All groups received two film coated tablets three times a day. Group 1 received the CHMP tablets 3 × 2 per day, group 2 the CHMP tablets 2 × 2 and placebo tablets 2 × 1 per day and group 3 received placebo tablets 3 × 2 per day. Maximum duration of treatment was 84 days. The primary efficacy criterion was the comparison of the incidences of new occurring RTIs between the treatment groups during the prophylactic treatment. In addition the character of occurring infections, number of sick days and severity of infections were compared. Further criteria were subjects' well being, the satisfaction of subjects with the respective treatments and severity and incidence of the observed adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) during the study period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT No. 2010-023227-26. RESULTS: From 371 subjects screened, a total of 351 subjects of both sexes from 18 to 75 years were randomly allocated to one of the three groups. In order to achieve scientifically and medically impeccable results it was necessary to address acute infections of the respiratory tract occurring during the normal incubation period. Early infections (≤day 7) were excluded from the data set in a sensitivity analysis. In the intention to treat (ITT) population excluding early infections ≤day 7 (n = 344) the infection rates were 13.3% for CHMP 3 × 2 (n = 113), 18.4% for CHMP 2 × 2 (n = 114) and 25.6% for placebo (n = 117). The statistical trend test showed significant results (p = 0.0171). For the per protocol (PP) population - also excluding infections ≤day 7 (n = 334) - infection rates were: CHMP 3 × 2 (n = 110) 12.7%, CHMP 2 × 2 (n = 113) 18.6% and placebo (n = 111) 24.3% (p = 0.0266). Secondary parameters of infections (infection diagnosis, intensity, duration) showed no relevant differences between the treatment groups. The study medication was well tolerated. LIMITATIONS: This was the first clinical ICH-GCP study with the CHMP conducted in this indication and with a sufficient number of subjects. The study population comprised subjects from 18 to 75 years and covered different diagnoses of RTIs. The results show a benefit when using 3 × 2 film tablets of CHMP for prophylaxis of RTIs. However, no data are available on use of the CHMP in this indication in children, adolescents and the elderly (over 75 years). CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrates the efficacy and safety of the combination herbal medicinal product as the treatment of first choice in the prophylactic treatment of episodes of respiratory tract infections. Clinical experience was confirmed in an ICH-GCP study.

Immunologic effect and tolerability of intra-seasonal subcutaneous immunotherapy with an 8-day up-dosing schedule to 10,000 standardized quality-units: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend that allergen-specific immunotherapy for pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis is initiated preseasonally. However, because subjects often present to physicians with allergy symptoms during the pollen season, "within-season" initiation of specific immunotherapy is of special interest. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the immunomodulatory effects and tolerability of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with Standardized Quality (SQ) 6-grass mix and rye allergen extract, using an 8-day intra-seasonal up-dosing schedule to 10,000 SQ-units (SQ-U). METHODS: In a 9-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults (mean age, 34.6 years; 99.3% whites) with grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis (mean disease duration, 15.1 years) were randomized 3:1 to receive SCIT or placebo. Treatment was initiated during the 2008 pollen season, with an 8-day up-dosing from 100 to 10,000 SQ-U (6 daily injections) followed by 2 maintenance injections of 10,000 SQ-U at intervals of 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. The primary end point examined immunologic effects, assessing the difference in IgE-blocking factor (serum components competing with IgE for allergen binding) between SCIT and placebo at week 9. Secondary/explorative end points included the difference in IgE-blocking factor, specific IgG(4), and specific IgE at various times. Tolerability (adverse events, local and systemic allergic reactions) of the up-dosing schedule was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 148 treated subjects 144 (SCIT n = 109; placebo n = 35) were analyzed for the primary parameter. Immunologic response (significantly higher increase in IgE-blocking factor and IgG(4) levels) occurred with SCIT versus placebo at week 9 (IgE-blocking factor, P = 0.0017; IgG(4,)P = 0.0215). Significant differences were observed as early as week 3. AEs were reported in 60.7% of SCIT- and 30.6% of placebo-treated subjects, with no treatment-related serious AEs. Local allergic reactions occurred in 46.4% of SCIT and 8.3% of placebo subjects (χ(2) test, P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed between groups in the incidence of systemic reactions (7.1% SCIT vs 5.6% placebo; χ(2) test, P = 0.7413). CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides the first description of short (8-day) intra-seasonal up-dosing with SCIT, which induced immunologic effects after only 3 weeks, and was generally well tolerated, although it induced a marked increase in the rate of local reactions compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00807547; ALK trial ID SHX0562.

Suspected black cohosh hepatotoxicity: no evidence by meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials for isopropanolic black cohosh extract.

OBJECTIVE: Black cohosh, a popular herbal treatment for menopausal symptoms, has been implicated in a number of hepatotoxicity case reports. The purpose of this investigation was to analyze data gained from clinical trials on the effect of black cohosh on liver function. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, and controlled clinical trials was conducted. These studies primarily evaluated the efficacy and safety of the isopropanolic black cohosh extract (iCR) in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Raw data on liver function values of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase were considered in this analysis, if these data at baseline and after 3 to 6 months of treatment were available. Standard methods of descriptive statistics were used in this analysis. RESULTS: Five studies involving a total of 1,117 women were included in the meta-analyses. A total of 1,020 women (test population=517 and reference population=503) completed the studies. Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women (40-60 y) were treated daily with iCR (corresponding to 40-128 mg drug) for 3 to 6 months. The meta-analyses of the standardized mean differences in the "test" versus "reference" showed no significant effects and no differences between double-blind, placebo-controlled and other trials. The overall fixed effect ± SEM was 0.055 ± 0.062 (P=0.37) for aspartate aminotransferase and 0.063 ± 0.062 (P=0.31) for alanine aminotransferase. The nonsignificant effects concerned the overall analyses of all included studies as well as the proportion of placebo-controlled studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis of five randomized, double-blind, and controlled clinical trials showed no evidence that iCR has any adverse effect on liver function.

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of Boswellia serrata in maintaining remission of Crohn's disease: good safety profile but lack of efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Complementary therapies are frequently used by patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term therapy with a new Boswellia serrata extract (Boswelan, PS0201Bo) in maintaining remission in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: In 22 German centers a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel study was performed. In all, 108 outpatients with CD in clinical remission were included. Patients were randomized to Boswelan (3×2 capsules/day; 400 mg each) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in whom remission was maintained throughout the 52 weeks. Secondary endpoints were time to relapse, changes of Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and IBD Questionnaire (IBDQ) scores. RESULTS: The trial was prematurely terminated due to insufficient discrimination of drug and placebo with regard to the primary efficacy endpoint. A total of 82 patients were randomized to Boswelan (n=42) or placebo (n=40). Sixty-six patients could be analyzed for efficacy. 59.9% of the actively treated patients and 55.3% of the placebo group stayed in remission (P=0.85). The mean time to diagnosis of relapse was 171 days for the active group and 185 days for the placebo group (P=0.69). With respect to CDAI, IBDQ, and laboratory measurements of inflammation, no advantages in favor of active treatment were detected. Regarding safety concerns, no disadvantages of taking the drug compared to placebo were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The trial confirmed good tolerability of a new Boswellia serrata extract, Boswelan, in long-term treatment of CD. However, superiority versus placebo in maintenance therapy of remission could not be demonstrated.

Interlaboratory studies with a proposed patch test design to evaluate the irritation potential of surfactants.

BACKGROUND: Development of cosmetic products and household detergents necessitates comparative study designs to assess the skin tolerance of products. In initial tests, the epicutaneous patch test for irritation is widely used. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to develop a protocol that would facilitate a comparison of results obtained when tests are conducted by different laboratories. METHODS: 'In-house' and standardized patch test protocols were used to assess irritation potentials of surfactant-based products in intra- and interlaboratory studies using defined surfactant samples. RESULTS: The various in-house protocols tested did not consistently produce equivalent results. In order to develop a study design that yields comparable results, various factors were identified and adjusted. The standardized study protocol includes occlusive application of 70 microl of the test substance to the back of 30 subjects, defined reading times and schemes, assessments based mainly on erythema, and inclusion of sodium laureth sulfate and sodium dodecyl sulfate as positive controls as well as water as a negative control. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the standardized protocol and training of assessors improved the reliability and consistency of results whereby the irritation potentials of the references and test samples were ranked similarly by the laboratories.

A pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with inflammatory chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: National Institutes of Health (NIH) category III prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a prevalent condition for which no standardised treatment exists. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of a standardised pollen extract in men with inflammatory CP/CPPS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a multicentre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study comparing the pollen extract (Cernilton) to placebo in men with CP/CPPS (NIH IIIA) attending urologic centres. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomised to receive oral capsules of the pollen extract (two capsules q8h) or placebo for 12 wk. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint of the study was symptomatic improvement in the pain domain of the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). Participants were evaluated using the NIH-CPSI individual domains and total score, the number of leukocytes in post-prostatic massage urine (VB3), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and the sexuality domain of a life satisfaction questionnaire at baseline and after 6 and 12 wk. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, 139 men were randomly allocated to the pollen extract (n=70) or placebo (n=69). The individual domains pain (p=0.0086) and quality of life (QoL; p=0.0250) as well as the total NIH-CPSI score (p=0.0126) were significantly improved after 12 wk of treatment with pollen extract compared to placebo. Response, defined as a decrease of the NIH-CPSI total score by at least 25% or at least 6 points, was seen in the pollen extract versus placebo group in 70.6% and 50.0% (p=0.0141), respectively. Adverse events were minor in all patients studied. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, the pollen extract significantly improved total symptoms, pain, and QoL in patients with inflammatory CP/CPPS without severe side-effects.

Effect of pollen-specific sublingual immunotherapy on oral allergy syndrome: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: : Oral allergy syndrome (OAS) triggered by fruit and vegetables often occurs in patients with pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis because of cross-reactive epitopes in pollen and associated foods. This open observational study examined the effect of pollen-specific sublingual immunotherapy ([SLIT] B. U. Pangramin or SLITone involving birch/alder/hazel, grasses/rye, and/or mugwort) on OAS triggered by several foods in patients treated in standard practice. Very few studies have examined SLIT use in this situation. METHODS: : Patients (n = 102) had pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis and OAS and were followed for up to 12 months. Baseline OAS (triggers, symptoms, and symptom severity) was assessed by questionnaire and patient history. Change in OAS was assessed using oral challenge test with 1 or 2 dominant food triggers (and compared with the sum score calculated from the OAS questionnaire at baseline) and clinician ratings of change. Pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use were also measured. RESULTS: : In the oral challenge test, 77.0% of patients were considered responders (decrease in sum score of ≥50%; no difference in patients receiving B. U. Pangramin or SLITone). At baseline, investigators rated OAS severity as at least moderate in 94.9% of patients compared with 36.9% after 12 months of treatment. After 12 months, OAS was rated as much or very much improved in 72.9% of patients. Sublingual immunotherapy significantly reduced rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use. Only 10% of patients experienced adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: : This study supplements the sparse literature on this topic and suggests that pollen-specific SLIT can reduce OAS triggered by pollen-associated foods in patients with pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis.

Potassium paraaminobenzoate (POTABA) in the treatment of Peyronie's disease: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of potassium paraaminobenzoate (Potaba) in Peyronie's disease in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study during a 12-months period of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 103 patients with Peyronie's disease and a history <12 months, non-calcified plaques and without pre-treatment were included. 51 were randomized to potassium paraaminobenzoate, 52 to placebo receiving 4 x 3g/day for 12 months. Follow-up was performed during the treatment period. Response has been defined as regression in plaque-size and/or reduction in penile curvature of at least 30%. Data analysis was focussed on 75 patients who completed the study [valid-cases (VC)]. RESULTS: No severe adverse events occurred. Response rates were 74.3% on potassium paraaminobenzoate and 50.0% on placebo (p=0.016). Mean plaque-size decreased from 259 mm(2) to 142 mm(2) in the treatment arm. In the placebo group, plaque-size aggravated from 259 mm(2) to 303 mm(2) after 6 months but improved slightly to 233 mm(2) after 12 months. Differences between the groups were significant (p=0.042). Pre-existing curvature did not improve under the drug (p=0.066) but comparing the development of new curvature or deterioration of pre-existing curvature under potassium paraaminobenzoate penile deviation remained stable. However, under placebo penile curvature deteriorated significantly in 32.5% of the cases (p<0.001). No significant differences concerning decrease of pain could be observed between the two groups (82.6% vs. 77.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate a significant plaque-related effect of potassium paraaminobenzoate. There was no relevant difference with regard to improvement of pre-existing penile deviation. However, under potassium paraaminobenzoate a significant protective effect on deterioration of penile curvature could be demonstrated. Potassium paraaminobenzoate appears to be useful to stabilize the disorder and prevent progression of penile curvature.