Renal Biopsy for Diagnosis in Kidney Disease: Indication, Technique, and Safety.

Renal biopsies are the gold standard for diagnosis, staging, and prognosis of underlying parenchymal kidney disease. This article provides an overview of the current indications and highlights ways to reduce bleeding complications in order to achieve optimal diagnostic yield with minimal risk to the patient. Novel indications have emerged from the increasing use of new molecularly targeted oncologic therapies in recent years, which often induce immune-mediated renal disease. On the other hand, the detection of specific antibodies against target antigens on podocytes in the sera of patients with new-onset nephrotic syndrome has now relativized the indication for biopsy in membranous nephropathy. The use of semi-automatic spring-loaded biopsy devices and real-time ultrasound considerably declined the complication rate and is the current standard. Percutaneous renal biopsies are overall a safe procedure if contraindications are considered. A coagulation disorder needs to be excluded beforehand, and an elevated blood pressure must be reduced to the normotensive range with medications. A laparoscopic approach or a radiology interventional procedure through the internal jugular vein may be considered for obtaining a kidney tissue sample if there is an urgent indication and a bleeding tendency cannot be adequately corrected. Major bleeding after a percutaneous renal biopsy can usually be managed with selective arterial embolization of the injured renal vessel. The use of a 16-gauge needle is the most reasonable compromise between diagnostic benefit and risk of complication. In the routine diagnostic, the biopsy specimen is examined with light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. Combination with modern molecular pathology techniques will contribute to more precise insights into the development and progression of kidney disease, which will likely refine future treatments in nephrology.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients-Stratified Analysis of the Humoral Immune Response.

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a more severe course of COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a quantitative serologic testing of antibodies specific for the wild type of SARS-CoV-2 and the Omicron variant of concern before and after a third-dose vaccination, either mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) in a cohort of 103 stable kidney transplant recipients (median [range] age, 58 [22-84] y, 57 men [55.3%]). Results: Third-dose vaccination increased the seroconversion rate from 57.3% to 71.8%. However, despite a marked rise of the antibody concentrations after the booster, 55.4% and 11.6% only formed neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 wild type and Omicron, respectively. Treatment with mycophenolic acid/mycophenolate mofetil (in strata of the dose quartiles), advanced age, and' above all' impaired renal function (eGFR <60 mL/min) adversely influenced the humoral immunity regarding seroconversion and inhibition of the wild type of SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions: Apart from immunosuppressive therapy, the humoral vaccination response is largely affected by nonmodifiable factors in kidney transplant recipients. With the currently leading and clinically easier Omicron variant, this puts into perspective the strategy to significantly enhance the protective efficacy of the available vaccines by reducing or temporarily stopping proliferation inhibitors, not least considering the inherent rejection risk with a possible deterioration of graft function.

Urinary Carnosinase-1 Excretion is Associated with Urinary Carnosine Depletion and Risk of Graft Failure in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of the TransplantLines Cohort Study.

Carnosine affords protection against oxidative and carbonyl stress, yet high concentrations of the carnosinase-1 enzyme may limit this. We recently reported that high urinary carnosinase-1 is associated with kidney function decline and albuminuria in patients with chronic kidney disease. We prospectively investigated whether urinary carnosinase-1 is associated with a high risk for development of late graft failure in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Carnosine and carnosinase-1 were measured in 24 h urine in a longitudinal cohort of 703 stable KTRs and 257 healthy controls. Cox regression was used to analyze the prospective data. Urinary carnosine excretions were significantly decreased in KTRs (26.5 [IQR 21.4-33.3] µmol/24 h versus 34.8 [IQR 25.6-46.8] µmol/24 h; p < 0.001). In KTRs, high urinary carnosinase-1 concentrations were associated with increased risk of undetectable urinary carnosine (OR 1.24, 95%CI [1.06-1.45]; p = 0.007). During median follow-up for 5.3 [4.5-6.0] years, 84 (12%) KTRs developed graft failure. In Cox regression analyses, high urinary carnosinase-1 excretions were associated with increased risk of graft failure (HR 1.73, 95%CI [1.44-2.08]; p < 0.001) independent of potential confounders. Since urinary carnosine is depleted and urinary carnosinase-1 imparts a higher risk for graft failure in KTRs, future studies determining the potential of carnosine supplementation in these patients are warranted.

Donor organ intervention before kidney transplantation: Head-to-head comparison of therapeutic hypothermia, machine perfusion, and donor dopamine pretreatment. What is the evidence?

Therapeutic hypothermia, hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (MP), and renal-dose dopamine administered to stable brain-dead donors have shown efficacy to reduce the dialysis requirement after kidney transplantation. In a head-to-head comparison of the three major randomized controlled trials in this field, we estimated the number-needed-to-treat for each method, evaluated costs and inquired into special features regarding long-term outcomes. The MP and hypothermia trials used any dialysis requirement during the first postoperative week, whereas the dopamine trial assessed >1 dialysis session as primary endpoint. Compared to controls, the respective rates declined by 5.7% with MP, 10.9% with hypothermia, and 10.7% with dopamine. Costs to prevent one endpoint in one recipient amount to approximately $17 000 with MP but are negligible with the donor interventions. MP resulted in a borderline significant difference of 4% in 3-year graft survival, but a point of interest is that the preservation method was switched in 25 donors (4.6%) for technical reasons. Graft survival was not improved with dopamine on intention-to-treat but suggested an exposure-response relationship with infusion time. MP was less efficacious and cost-effective to prevent posttransplant dialysis. Whether the benefit on early graft dysfunction achieved with any method will improve long-term graft survival remains to be established.

Carnosinase concentration, activity, and CNDP1 genotype in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without nephropathy.

This study assessed if serum carnosinase (CNDP1) activity and concentration in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) with diabetic nephropathy (DN) differs from those without nephropathy. In a cross-sectional design 127 patients with T2D with DN ((CTG)5 homozygous patients n = 45) and 145 patients with T2D without nephropathy ((CTG)5 homozygous patients n = 47) were recruited. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to predict factors relevant for serum CNDP1 concentration. CNDP1 (CTG)5 homozygous patients with T2D with DN had significantly lower CNDP1 concentrations (30.4 ± 18.3 vs 51.2 ± 17.6 µg/ml, p < 0.05) and activity (1.25 ± 0.5 vs 2.53 ± 1.1 µmol/ml/h, p < 0.05) than those without nephropathy. This applied for patients with DN on the whole, irrespective of (CTG)5 homozygosity. In the multivariate regression analyses, lower serum CNDP1 concentrations correlated with impaired renal function and to a lesser extend with the CNDP1 genotype (95% CI of regression coefficients: eGFR: 0.10-1.94 (p = 0.001); genotype: - 0.05 to 5.79 (p = 0.055)). Our study demonstrates that serum CNDP1 concentrations associate with CNDP1 genotype and renal function in patients with T2D. Our data warrant further studies using large cohorts to confirm these findings and to delineate the correlation between low serum CNDP1 concentrations and renal function deterioration in patients with T2D.

Donor Dopamine Does Not Affect Liver Graft Survival: Evidence of Safety From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Treatment of donation after brain death (DBD) donors with low-dose dopamine improves the outcomes after kidney and heart transplantation. This study investigates the course of liver allografts from multiorgan donors enrolled in the randomized dopamine trial between 2004 and 2007 (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00115115). There were 264 hemodynamically stable DBDs who were randomly assigned to receive low-dose dopamine. Dopamine was infused at 4 µg/kg/minute for a median duration of 6.0 hours (interquartile range, 4.4-7.5 hours). We assessed the outcomes of 212 liver transplantations (LTs) performed at 32 European centers. Donors and recipients of both groups were very similar in baseline characteristics. Pretransplant laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was not different in recipients of a dopamine-treated versus untreated graft (18 ± 8 versus 20 ± 8; P = 0.12). Mean cold ischemia time was 10.6 ± 2.9 versus 10.1 ± 2.8 hours (P = 0.24). No differences occurred in biopsy-proven rejection episodes (14.4% versus 15.7%; P = 0.85), requirement of hemofiltration (27.9% versus 31.5%; P = 0.65), the need for early retransplantation (5.8% versus 6.5%; P > 0.99), the incidence of primary nonfunction (7.7% versus 8.3%; P > 0.99), and in-hospital mortality (15.4% versus 14.8%; P > 0.99). Graft survival was 71.2% versus 73.2% and 59.6% versus 62.0% at 2 and 3 years (log-rank P = 0.71). Patient survival was 76.0% versus 78.7% and 65.4% versus 69.4% at 1 and 3 years (log-rank P = 0.50). In conclusion, donor pretreatment with dopamine has no short-term or longterm effects on outcome after LT. Therefore, low-dose dopamine pretreatment can safely be implemented as the standard of care in hemodynamically stable DBDs.

Impact of Donor Core Body Temperature on Graft Survival After Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A previous donor intervention trial found that induction of mild therapeutic hypothermia in the brain-dead donor reduced the dialysis requirement after kidney transplantation. Consequences on the performance of cardiac allografts after transplantation were not explored to date. METHODS: Cohort study investigating 3-year heart allograft survival according to spontaneous core body temperature (CBT) assessed on the day of organ procurement. The study is nested in the database of the randomized trial of donor pretreatment with low-dose dopamine (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT000115115). RESULTS: Ninety-nine heart transplant recipients who had received a cardiac allograft from a multiorgan donor enrolled in the dopamine trial were grouped by tertiles of the donor's CBT assessed by a mere temperature reading 4 to 20 hours before procurement (lowest, 32.0-36.2°C; middle, 36.3-36.8°C; highest, 36.9-38.8°C). Baseline characteristics considering demographics of donors and recipients, concomitant donor treatments, donor hemodynamic, and respiratory parameters as well as underlying cardiac diseases in recipients, pretransplant hemodynamic assessments, including pretransplant inotropic/mechanical support, urgency, and waiting time were similar. A lower CBT was associated with inferior heart allograft survival (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.93, per tertile; P = 0.02, and hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.93°C; P = 0.02) when CBT was included as continuous explanatory variable in the Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A lower CBT in the brain-dead donor before procurement may associate with an unfavorable clinical course after heart transplantation. More research is required, before therapeutic hypothermia can routinely be used in multiorgan donors when a cardiac transplantation is intended.

Dopamine in transplantation: Written off or comeback with novel indication?

Renal-dose dopamine has fallen out of favor in the intensive care unit (ICU) during past years due to its ineffectiveness to prevent impending or to ameliorate overt renal failure in the critically ill. By contrast, growing evidence indicates that low-dose dopamine administered to the stable organ donor after brain death confirmation improves the clinical course of transplanted organs after kidney and heart transplantation. Ensuring a thorough monitoring for potential circulatory side effects, employment of dopamine at a dose of 4 µg/kg/min is safe in the deceased donor. Among recipients, the advantageous effect is easy to achieve, inexpensive, and devoid of adverse side effects. The mode of action relies on dopamine's propensity to mitigate injury in various cell systems from isolated transplantable organs under cold storage conditions. The present review article summarizes the clinical evidence of dopamine donor pretreatment in solid organ transplantation and focuses on the underlying molecular mechanisms of cellular protection. Introducing the routine use of low-dose dopamine for the management of the brain-dead donor in the ICU before procurement provides an evidence-based strategy to improve graft outcome after kidney transplantation without conferring harm to non-renal grafts, namely to livers and hearts, in cases of multi-organ donation.

The CNDP1 (CTG)5 Polymorphism Is Associated with Biopsy-Proven Diabetic Nephropathy, Time on Hemodialysis, and Diabetes Duration.

Considering that the homozygous CNDP1 (CTG)5 genotype affords protection against diabetic nephropathy (DN) in female patients with type 2 diabetes, this study assessed if this association remains gender-specific when applying clinical inclusion criteria (CIC-DN) or biopsy proof (BP-DN). Additionally, it assessed if the prevalence of the protective genotype changes with diabetes duration and time on hemodialysis and if this occurs in association with serum carnosinase (CN-1) activity. Whereas the distribution of the (CTG)5 homozygous genotype in the no-DN and CIC-DN patients was comparable, a lower frequency was found in the BP-DN patients, particularly in females. We observed a significant trend towards high frequencies of the (CTG)5 homozygous genotype with increased time on dialysis. This was also observed for diabetes duration but only reached significance when both (CTG)5 homo- and heterozygous patients were included. CN-1 activity negatively correlated with time on hemodialysis and was lower in (CTG)5 homozygous patients. The latter remained significant in female subjects after gender stratification. We confirm the association between the CNDP1 genotype and DN to be likely gender-specific. Although our data also suggest that (CTG)5 homozygous patients may have a survival advantage on dialysis and in diabetes, this hypothesis needs to be confirmed in a prospective cohort study.

Effects of Dopamine Donor Pretreatment on Graft Survival after Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Donor dopamine improves initial graft function after kidney transplantation due to antioxidant properties. We investigated if a 4 µg/kg per minute continuous dopamine infusion administered after brain-death confirmation affects long-term graft survival and examined the exposure-response relationship with treatment duration. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Five-year follow-up of 487 renal transplant patients from 60 European centers who had participated in the randomized, multicenter trial of dopamine donor pretreatment between 2004 and 2007 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00115115). RESULTS: Follow-up was complete in 99.2%. Graft survival was 72.6% versus 68.7% (P=0.34), and 83.3% versus 80.4% (P=0.42) after death-censoring in treatment and control arms according to trial assignment. Although infusion times varied substantially in the treatment arm (range 0-32.2 hours), duration of the dopamine infusion and all-cause graft failure exhibited an exposure-response relationship (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.92 to 1.00, per hour). Cumulative frequency curves of graft survival and exposure time of the dopamine infusion indicated a maximum response rate at 7.10 hours (95% CI, 6.99 to 7.21), which almost coincided with the optimum infusion time for improvement of early graft function (7.05 hours; 95% CI, 6.92 to 7.18). Taking infusion time of 7.1 hours as threshold in subsequent graft survival analyses indicated a relevant benefit: Overall, 81.5% versus 68.5%; P=0.03; and 90.3% versus 80.2%; P=0.04 after death-censoring. CONCLUSIONS: We failed to show a significant graft survival advantage on intention-to-treat. Dopamine infusion time was very short in a considerable number of donors assigned to treatment. Our finding of a significant, nonlinear exposure-response relationship disclosed a threshold value of the dopamine infusion time that may improve long-term kidney graft survival.

Donor Desmopressin Treatment Does Not Affect Transplant Outcome in the Fischer to Lewis Rat Renal Transplant Model.

OBJECTIVES: Retrospective studies suggest that donor desmopressin (DDAVP) treatment improves renal transplant outcome. The present study tests the hypothesis that desmopressin neutralizes the graft's endothelium from proinflammatory angiopoietin 2 containing Weibel-Palade bodies in the donor, resulting in reduced Weibel-Palade body release at the time of reperfusion in the recipient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using rat models, we examined the influence of desmopressin treatment on the expression of vasopressin 2 receptors and adhesion molecules in brain-dead donors, with renal function examined in allogeneic recipients. The influence of desmopressin on the expression of adhesion molecules also was tested in vitro. RESULTS: Vasopressin 2 receptors were restricted to collecting ducts and distal tubules and only scarcely found in the renal vasculature. Vasopressin 2 receptor expression was down-regulated in brain-dead rats by desmopressin. Renal expression of vascular cellular adhesion molecule 1 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 were significantly reduced in these rats. In contrast, angiopoietin 2 did not influence the expression of adhesion molecules in in vitro cultured endothelial cells after tumor necrosis factor ? stimulation. Donor desmopressin treatment improved neither renal function nor histology in allogeneic renal transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the hypothesis that the clinically observed salutary effect of desmopressin is mediated by depletion of Weibel-Palade bodies in renal allografts.

Excellent graft and patient survival after renal transplantation from donors after brain death with acute kidney injury: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Whether organs from donors after brain death (DBD) with acute kidney injury (AKI) should be accepted for transplantation is still a matter of debate. METHODS: This was a retrospective, center-based, matched cohort study of 33 renal transplant patients who received a renal allograft from a DBD with AKI. Sixty-five kidney transplants without donor AKI transplanted directly before and after the index transplantation served as controls. RESULTS: All AKI donors were classified according to RIFLE criteria: 9.1 % Risk, 54.6 % Injury, and 36.4 % Failure. Mean serum creatinine was 2.41 ± 0.88 mg/dL at procurement and 1.06 ± 0.32 mg/dL on admission. AKI donors had lower 24-h urine production (3.22 ± 1.95 vs. 4.59 ± 2.53 L, p = 0.009) and received more frequently noradrenaline (93.9 vs. 72.3 %, p = 0.02) and/or adrenaline (15.2 vs. 1.5 %, p = 0.02). Recipient and transplant characteristics were similar except a more favorable HLA match in control patients (p = 0.01). Hemodialysis posttransplant was more frequently used in AKI recipients (14/33 [42.4 %] vs. 18/65 [27.7 %], p = 0.17). While significant elevations in serum creatinine were noted in these patients until 10 days after transplantation, this difference lost statistical significance by day 14. One-year graft survival was very similar when comparing the groups (93.6 % [95 % CI 76.8-98.4 %] vs. 90.3 % [95 % CI 79.6-95.5 %], log rank p = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Kidneys from AKI donors can be transplanted with excellent intermediate prognosis and should not be discarded.

N-Octanoyl Dopamine for Donor Treatment in a Brain-death Model of Kidney and Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the potential use of N-octanoyl dopamine (NOD) in donor management to ameliorate the damage caused by brain death and ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat model of kidney and heart transplantation. METHODS: Brain-dead Fisher rats were treated for 6 hours with either saline or saline plus NOD. Orthotopic kidney and heterotopic heart transplantation were performed in different Lewis recipient rats. The right donor kidneys were stored for biochemical analysis. Blood samples were taken from the donor and on several days after transplantation from the recipient. All grafts were harvested after 7 days. RESULTS: There was no effect on donor heart rate and blood pressure under NOD treatment. The release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) during brain death was reduced in the NOD group. The right kidneys from NOD-preconditioned animals revealed diminished expression of the proinflammatory cell adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). Nevertheless, there was no difference in renal infiltration with ED1 (CD68) or major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-positive cells. Recipients receiving a renal allograft from NOD-treated donors had a significantly better renal function at day 1 after transplantation. Banff-grading after 7 days showed significantly reduced scores for tubulitis and vasculitis in the grafts of these recipients. In the heart allograft recipients, lower plasma LDH levels were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Donor preconditioning with NOD leads to better graft function and reduced acute rejection in untreated renal allograft recipients without displaying adverse effects on heart allografts.

Vagal stimulation in brain dead donor rats decreases chronic allograft nephropathy in recipients.

BACKGROUND: Although it has been shown that a vagus nerve stimulation of brain dead (BD) donors leads to an improvement of renal function in recipients in an acute allograft rejection model, its influence on chronic allograft nephropathy is still unknown. In the present study, we assessed the influence of donor vagus nerve stimulation on survival, renal function and histology in a chronic allograft model. METHODS: Brain death was induced in Fisher rats, and electro-stimulation of the vagus nerve was applied in one group (BD + vagus) during the whole course of BD (6 h). Unstimulated BD Fisher donor rats served as controls. Allogeneic Lewis rats were used as recipients and no immunosuppressive medication was administered. Blood and urine samples were collected every second week. Banff classification was assessed from harvested allografts. RESULTS: Vagal stimulation of BD donors resulted in an improved survival of recipients. Long-term renal function was significantly better in these recipients as reflected by improved creatinine clearance. Banff classification revealed significantly reduced vasculopathy and less tubulopathy in the BD + vagus group. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our data demonstrate a long-lasting beneficial effect of vagus nerve stimulation in BD donors on the renal transplantation outcome. Hence, activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in BD donors may represent a novel therapeutic modality to reduce chronic allograft nephropathy without any side effects for the recipient.