Proceedings of the First Pediatric Coma and Disorders of Consciousness Symposium by the Curing Coma Campaign, Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group, and NINDS: Gearing for Success in Coma Advancements for Children and Neonates.

This proceedings article presents the scope of pediatric coma and disorders of consciousness based on presentations and discussions at the First Pediatric Disorders of Consciousness Care and Research symposium held on September 14th, 2021. Herein we review the current state of pediatric coma care and research opportunities as well as shared experiences from seasoned researchers and clinicians. Salient current challenges and opportunities in pediatric and neonatal coma care and research were identified through the contributions of the presenters, who were Jose I. Suarez, MD, Nina F. Schor, MD, PhD, Beth S. Slomine, PhD Erika Molteni, PhD, and Jan-Marino Ramirez, PhD, and moderated by Varina L. Boerwinkle, MD, with overview by Mark Wainwright, MD, and subsequent audience discussion. The program, executively planned by Varina L. Boerwinkle, MD, Mark Wainwright, MD, and Michelle Elena Schober, MD, drove the identification and development of priorities for the pediatric neurocritical care community.

COVID-19 and the Pediatric Nervous System: Global Collaboration to Meet a Global Need.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected mortality and morbidity across all ages, including children. It is now known that neurological manifestations of COVID-19, ranging from headaches to stroke, may involve the central and/or peripheral nervous system at any age. Neurologic involvement is also noted in the multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, a pediatric condition that occurs weeks after infection with the causative virus of COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Knowledge about mechanisms of neurologic disease is scarce but rapidly growing. COVID-19 neurologic manifestations may have particularly adverse impacts on the developing brain. Emerging data suggest a cohort of patients with COVID-19 will have longitudinal illness affecting their cognitive, physical, and emotional health, but little is known about the long-term impact on affected children and their families. Pediatric collaboratives have begun to provide important initial information on neuroimaging manifestations and the incidence of ischemic stroke in children with COVID 19. The Global Consortium Study of Neurologic Dysfunction in COVID-19-Pediatrics, a multinational collaborative, is working to improve understanding of the epidemiology, mechanisms of neurological manifestations, and the long-term implications of COVID-19 in children and their families.

Docosahexaenoic acid decreased inflammatory gene expression, but not 18-kDa translocator protein binding, in rat pup brain after controlled cortical impact.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury is the leading cause of acquired neurologic disability in children. In our model of pediatric traumatic brain injury, controlled cortical impact (CCI) in rat pups, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) improved lesion volume and cognitive testing as late as postinjury day (PID) 50. Docosahexaenoic acid decreased proinflammatory messenger RNA (mRNA) in microglia and macrophages at PIDs 3 and 7, but not 30. We hypothesized that DHA affected inflammatory markers differentially relative to impact proximity, early and persistently after CCI. METHODS: To provide a temporal snapshot of regional neuroinflammation, we measured 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) binding using whole brain autoradiography at PIDs 3, 7, 30, and 50. Guided by TSPO results, we measured mRNA levels in contused cortex and underlying hippocampus for genes associated with proinflammatory and inflammation-resolving states at PIDs 2 and 3. RESULTS: Controlled cortical impact increased TSPO binding at all time points, most markedly at PID 3 and in regions closest to impact, not blunted by DHA. Controlled cortical impact increased cortical and hippocampal mRNA proinflammatory markers, blunted by DHA at PID 2 in hippocampus. CONCLUSION: Controlled cortical impact increased TSPO binding in the immature brain in a persistent manner more intensely with more severe injury, not altered by DHA. Controlled cortical impact increased PIDs 2 and 3 mRNA levels of proinflammatory and inflammation-resolving genes. Docosahexaenoic acid decreased proinflammatory markers associated with inflammasome activation at PID 2. We speculate that DHA's salutary effects on long-term outcomes result from early effects on the inflammasome. Future studies will examine functional effects of DHA on microglia both early and late after CCI.

Developmental traumatic brain injury decreased brain derived neurotrophic factor expression late after injury.

Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of acquired cognitive dysfunction in children. Hippocampal Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) is important for normal cognition. Little is known about the effects of TBI on BDNF levels in the developing hippocampus. We used controlled cortical impact (CCI) in the 17 day old rat pup to test the hypothesis that CCI would first increase rat hippocampal BDNF mRNA/protein levels relative to SHAM and Naïve rats by post injury day (PID) 2 and then decrease BDNF mRNA/protein by PID14. Relative to SHAM, CCI did not change BDNF mRNA/protein levels in the injured hippocampus in the first 2 days after injury but did decrease BDNF protein at PID14. Surprisingly, BDNF mRNA decreased at PID 1, 3, 7 and 14, and BDNF protein decreased at PID 2, in SHAM and CCI hippocampi relative to Naïve. In conclusion, TBI decreased BDNF protein in the injured rat pup hippocampus 14 days after injury. BDNF mRNA levels decreased in both CCI and SHAM hippocampi relative to Naïve, suggesting that certain aspects of the experimental paradigm (such as craniotomy, anesthesia, and/or maternal separation) may decrease the expression of BDNF in the developing hippocampus. While BDNF is important for normal cognition, no inferences can be made regarding the cognitive impact of any of these factors. Such findings, however, suggest that meticulous attention to the experimental paradigm, and possible inclusion of a Naïve group, is warranted in studies of BDNF expression in the developing brain after TBI.