Extracorporeal Albumin Dialysis in Liver Failure with MARS and SPAD: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Liver failure is associated with hepatic and extrahepatic organ failure leading to a high short-term mortality rate. Extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD) aims to reduce albumin-bound toxins accumulated during liver failure. ECAD detoxifies blood using albumin dialysis through an artificial semipermeable membrane with recirculation (molecular adsorbent recirculating system, MARS) or without (single-pass albumin dialysis, SPAD). METHODS: We performed a randomized crossover open trial in a surgical intensive care unit. The primary outcome of the study was total bilirubin reduction during MARS and during SPAD therapies. The secondary outcomes were conjugated bilirubin and bile acid level reduction during MARS and SPAD sessions and tolerance of dialysis system devices. Inclusion criteria were adult patients presenting liver failure with factor V activity <50% associated with bilirubin ≥250 µmol/L and a complication (either hepatic encephalopathy, severe pruritus, or hepatorenal syndrome). For MARS and SPAD, the dialysis flow rate was equal to 1,000 mL/h. RESULTS: Twenty crossovers have been performed. Baseline biochemical characteristics (bilirubin, ammonia, bile acids, creatinine, and urea) were not statistically different between MARS and SPAD. Both ECAD have led to a significant reduction in total bilirubin (-83 ± 67 µmol/L after MARS; -122 ± 118 µmol/L after SPAD session), conjugated bilirubin (-82 ± 61 µmol/L after MARS; -105 ± 96 µmol/L after SPAD session), and bile acid levels (-64 ± 75 µmol/L after MARS; -56 ± 56 µmol/L after SPAD session), all nondifferent comparing MARS to SPAD. CONCLUSION: A simple-to-perform SPAD therapy with equal to MARS dialysate flow parameters provides the same efficacy in bilirubin and bile acid removal. However, clinically relevant endpoints have to be evaluated in randomized trials to compare MARS and SPAD therapies and to define the place of SPAD in the liver failure care program.

Applicability of Pulse Pressure Variation during Unstable Hemodynamic Events in the Intensive Care Unit: A Five-Day Prospective Multicenter Study.

Pulse pressure variation can predict fluid responsiveness in strict applicability conditions. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical applicability of pulse pressure variation during episodes of patient hemodynamic instability in the intensive care unit. We conducted a five-day, seven-center prospective study that included patients presenting with an unstable hemodynamic event. The six predefined inclusion criteria for pulse pressure variation applicability were as follows: mechanical ventilation, tidal volume >7 mL/kg, sinus rhythm, no spontaneous breath, heart rate/respiratory rate ratio >3.6, absence of right ventricular dysfunction, or severe valvulopathy. Seventy-three patients presented at least one unstable hemodynamic event, with a total of 163 unstable hemodynamic events. The six predefined criteria for the applicability of pulse pressure variation were completely present in only 7% of these. This data indicates that PPV should only be used alongside a strong understanding of the relevant physiology and applicability criteria. Although these exclusion criteria appear to be profound, they likely represent an absolute contraindication of use for only a minority of critical care patients.

Transtracheal esophageal stent removal: a case-series.

Benign esophagorespiratory fistula is a rare but often lethal affection and difficult to cure. Possible treatments are surgery or esophageal stenting but may fail and cause respiratory failure. Two patients with spontaneous esophagorespiratory fistula after chemoradiotherapy for an esophageal malignancy were both treated by esophageal exclusion but esophageal stent were left in place. The esophageal stents were transtracheally removed through the fistula. The removals were successful, patients could leave Intensive Care Unit and returned home. Transtracheal esophageal stent removal is technically possible but very risky. Such situations must be avoided: esophageal stents must absolutely be removed before esophageal exclusion.

Effects of a continuous low-dose clonidine epidural regimen on pain, satisfaction and adverse events during labour: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Epidural clonidine has been proposed as an adjunct for anaesthetic mixtures during labour. Administered as a bolus, clonidine may have side effects such as sedation and hypotension; its continuous infusion could be attractive in this respect. We, therefore, conducted a randomized, double-blind trial using patient-controlled epidural analgesia with a background infusion using a low dose of clonidine during labour. METHODS: A total of 128 healthy parturients in active labour received a patient-controlled epidural analgesia solution of 0.0625% levobupivacaine and sufentanil 0.25 microg ml(-1) with or without clonidine 2 microg ml(-1). Ninety-five parturients were analysed. The pain score over time was evaluated as well as drug volume utilization; supplementation bolus and side effects were recorded. The primary endpoint was maternal satisfaction [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT00437996)]. RESULTS: Three patients in the control group failed to achieve satisfactory epidural analgesia owing to a technical issue. Although the primary endpoint was not statistically significant, analgesia was more pronounced and obtained earlier in the clonidine group. The area under the curve for the visual analogue pain score was significantly lower in the clonidine group. In this group, hourly doses of levobupivacaine and sufentanil were reduced (13.9 +/- 4.3 vs. 16.3 ml +/- 4.0; P = 0.005) as well as rescue supplementation and pruritus incidence (18 vs. 46%; P = 0.004). Maternal blood pressure was significantly lower, over time, in the clonidine group but remained within the normal range. Sedation was similar in both groups (4.3 vs. 2.0%; not significant). CONCLUSION: The addition of clonidine to epidural levobupivacaine and sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour improved analgesia, reduced the supplementation rate and reduced pruritus without improvement in maternal satisfaction. Blood pressure was significantly lower in the clonidine group over time but without clinical consequence.

Factors associated with noninvasive ventilation failure in postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency: an observational study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Few data are available on the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in postoperative patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). METHODS: Seventy-two patients coming from the surgical wards with postoperative ARF were retrospectively evaluated. The major characteristics of patients who were intubated were compared with the characteristics of those who were not after a trial of NIV. Predictive factors for failure of NIV were analysed. RESULTS: Out of 72 patients with ARF after surgery who were treated with NIV, 42 avoided intubation (58%). On a univariate analysis, a decrease in the paO2/FiO2 ratio after 1 h of NIV (223 +/- 84 to 160 +/- 68 mmHg, P < 0.05) was associated with NIV failure and need for tracheal intubation because of nosocomial pneumonia and an increased simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) 2. In a multivariate analysis, nosocomial pneumonia [odds ratio (OR) 4.189; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.383-12.687] and SAPS 2 higher than 35 (OR 4.969; 95% CI 1.627-15.172) were independent predictive factors of NIV failure. NIV success was associated with a reduced ICU stay (16.8 vs. 26.1 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: NIV could be considered in postoperative patients who presented with ARF. Nosocomial pneumonia is predictive of NIV failure.