Postpartum urinary retention: a systematic review of adverse effects and management.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is a well-known condition after childbirth. Often clinicians assume that this condition is transient, either through belief or by not being aware that its occurrence as measurement of post-void residual volume (PVRV) is often not routine. However, long lasting urinary retention is a serious condition that needs management in order to prevent urogenital tract morbidity. By performing a systematic review of the adverse effects of PUR and management of this condition, we aimed to identify the necessity of diagnosing this condition in the puerperium and to evaluate whether treatment is required. METHODS: We searched for all studies on PUR in OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and ongoing Trial registers. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. RESULTS: Twenty-four papers were included in this review. Limited data on adverse effects demonstrate potential morbidities, like micturition symptoms and sporadically spontaneous bladder ruptures, related to PUR. CONCLUSIONS: Based on current literature, evidence stating that PUR is harmless is lacking. Future research should focus on management strategies for overt PUR and the long-term consequences of covert PUR. Until these results are available, clinicians should be aware of the potential consequences and therefore keep trying to identify patients at risk of PUR and patients with the actual condition.

Risk factors for postpartum urinary retention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is a common condition with varying prevalence. Measurement of the post-void residual volume (PVRV) is not regularly performed. Various studies have been published on overt (the inability to void after giving birth, requiring catheterisation) and covert (an increased PVRV after spontaneous micturition) PUR. To evaluate which clinical prognostic factors are related to PUR, the identification of independent risk factors for covert and overt PUR is needed. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting on risk factors for PUR. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE to September 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Articles that reported on women diagnosed with PUR or with an abnormal PVRV. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The included articles were selected by two authors. We constructed two-by-two tables for potential risk factors of overt and covert PUR and calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three observational studies with original data were eligible for data extraction, of which 13 could be used for meta-analysis. Statistically significant risk factors for overt PUR were epidural analgesia (OR 7.7), instrumental delivery (OR 4.5), episiotomy (OR 4.8) and primiparity (OR 2.4). For covert PUR, variety in the definitions used resulted in heterogeneity; no significant prognostic factors were found. CONCLUSIONS: Instrumental delivery, epidural analgesia, episiotomy and nulliparity are statistically significantly associated with a higher incidence of overt PUR. The same factors were identified for covert PUR, but without statistical significance. Uniformity in definitions in future research is essential to create a prognostic model.