Evaluation and Perception of Clinical Pharmacist Participation in a Rapid Response Team During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The addition of a pharmacist to rapid response teams (RRT) has been shown to improve adherence to advanced cardiac life support protocols and to decrease mortality. A quality improvement study was initiated at a single center to evaluate the addition of a pharmacist to the RRT during cardiopulmonary arrest. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on pharmacy response time and interventions performed. In addition, a pre- and post-intervention survey of the interprofessional medical emergency response improvement team (MERIT) was performed to assess the perception of pharmacist involvement. RESULTS: From April to November 2019, the pharmacists responded to 19 RRT activations for cardiopulmonary arrest. An average of 29.8 minutes were spent at each event and an average of 5.5 interventions per event were made. The most common intervention made by pharmacists was medication procurement (54 interventions), followed by providing drug information (14 interventions). Pharmacists also ensured medication reimbursement (13 interventions). The majority of the MERIT strongly agreed or agreed that the addition of a pharmacist to RRT activations improved teamwork (83.1%), decreased medication turnaround time (84.6%), decreased medication errors (66.7%), and may have prevented a poor outcome (71.8%) in the post-implementation survey. CONCLUSION: Overall, pharmacists demonstrated value as a member of the RRT during cardiopulmonary arrest. The addition of a pharmacist was well received by interprofessional members of the MERIT.

The influence of goal setting and SmartRoom patient education videos on readmission rate, length of stay, and patient satisfaction in the orthopedic spine population.

The SmartRoom technology, a system now owned by TeleTracking Technologies, aims to transform the delivery of patient care in the inpatient environment. The purpose of this project was to use goal setting and SmartRoom patient education videos to examine whether the videos more effectively engaged patients and their families in their discharge plan and encouraged them to take a more active role in their care while hospitalized. This study used a descriptive design to analyze the effect of goal setting and patient education videos on patient satisfaction at discharge, hospital average length of stay, and 30-day readmission rate in the orthopedic spine surgical care setting. Comparisons were made among three patient groups. No statistically significant difference was found for average length of stay and 30-day readmission across these three groups. However, patient satisfaction with discharge, as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems, revealed an increase in five items regarding discharge with statistically significant differences on two of the five items.

Ticket to ride: reducing handoff risk during hospital patient transport.

A significant number of medical errors occur during patient handoffs, leading to less than optimal care, patient harm, and even death. The Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals require hospitals to implement a standardized approach to "handoff" communications. The authors describe an initiative that focuses on standardization of the physical and informational handoff during hospital transport; outcomes are promising in terms of both patient safety and patient satisfaction.

Medical emergency teams: a strategy for improving patient care and nursing work environments.

AIM: This paper reports a study of nurses' perceptions about medical emergency teams and their impact on patient care and the nursing work environment. BACKGROUND: In many acute care hospitals, nurses can summon emergency help by calling a medical emergency team, which is a team of expert critical care professionals adept at handling patient crisis scenarios. Critical care nurses form the core of such teams. In addition, of all the healthcare professionals, nurses are the ones who most often need and call for medical emergency team assistance. METHODS: A simple anonymous questionnaire distributed amongst 300 staff nurses at two sites of an acute care teaching hospital in the United States of America in mid-January of 2005. RESULTS: A total of 248 nurses responded to the survey (response rate = 82.7%). Ninety-three per cent of the nurses reported that medical emergency teams improved patient care and 84% felt that they improved the nursing work environment. Veteran nurses (with at least 10 years of experience) and new nurses (<1 year's experience) were more likely to perceive an improvement in patient care than other nurses (P = 0.025). Nurses who had called a medical emergency team on more than one occasion were more likely to value their ability to call a team (P = 0.002). Nearly sixty-five per cent of respondents said they would consider institutional medical emergency team response as a factor when seeking a new job in the future. Only 7% suggested a change in the team response process, and 4% suggested a change in activation criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Most nurses surveyed had a favourable opinion of the medical emergency team. Our findings suggest that other institutions should consider implementing a medical emergency team programme as a strategy to improve patient care and nurse working environment.