Single-stage total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures: an increased risk for periprosthetic joint infections?

BACKGROUND: Higher complication rates have been reported for total hip arthroplasty (THA) after osteosynthesis of proximal femur fractures (PFF). This study evaluated the infection risk for conversion of internal fixation of PFF to THA by a single-staged procedure in the absence of clear infection signs. METHODS: Patients undergoing a one-staged conversion to THA (2013-2018) after prior internal fixation of the proximal femur were included. Preoperative diagnostics with laboratory results, hip aspirations as well as intraoperative microbiology and sonication were assessed. Postoperative complications were recorded as well as patient demographics, duration between initial and conversion to THA, explanted osteosynthesis and implanted THA. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (24 male/34 female, 62.8 ± 14.5 years) were included with a mean time of 3.8 ± 7.5 years between internal fixation and conversion to THA (45 cementless, 3 cemented, 3 hybrid and 7 hybrid inverse THAs). Preoperative mean blood level CRP was 8.36 ± 14 mg/l (reference value < 5 mg/l) and leukocyte count was 7.11 ± 1.84^3/µl (4.5-10.000^3/µl). Fifty patients had intraoperative microbiological diagnostics, with either swabs in 86.2% and/or sonication in 29.3%. Positive microbiological results were recorded in 10% (5 of 50 patients), with pathogens identified being mainly Staphylococcus. Complications after conversion occurred in 9.6% including a postoperative low-grade infection rate of 5.8% after a mean of 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: This study found a positive microbiological test result in 10% of a one-stage conversion of PFF fixation to THA. Moreover, we found a high infection rate (5.8%) for early postoperative periprosthetic joint infection. Interestingly, CRP has not been proven to be an adequate parameter for low-grade infections or occult colonized implants. Therefore, we recommend a comprehensive pre- and intraoperative diagnostic including hip aspiration, swabs and sonication when considering one-staged revision.

[Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum: osteosynthesis]. / Periprothetische Frakturen des Acetabulums: Osteosynthese.

In most cases periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum are complex injuries and are extremely challenging for the treating medical team. Over the years the frequency of this overall rare entity has increased due to demographic changes. In recent years several treatment algorithms were published and provided the possibility of developing standardized treatment concepts. The classification of the fractures and a dedicated preoperative strategy are highly important for the quality of patient-centered care. In the literature the frequency of intraoperative fractures was initially given as 0.4%; however, several studies have been published in which a far higher rate of intraoperative fractures was detected by computed tomography (CT), often referred to as so-called occult fractures. The causes are multifactorial and there is significant association with whether cement-free press-fit acetabular cups were used or cemented forms. In approximately 75% of the cases a low energy impact was the cause of the fracture. In these patients systemic processes, such as osteoporotic alterations of the bony substance or the possible presence of low-grade infections should be considered. This article gives an overview of the diagnostics, planning, challenges and osteosynthetic treatment options for periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum.

Trends in fracture development of the upper extremity in Germany-a population-based description of the past 15 years.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies investigating fracture development in Germany are not available especially with regard to demographic change. The primary aim of this study was to report trends in fracture development of the upper extremity in Germany between 2002 and 2017 and to evaluate changes over time. METHODS: Evaluating inpatient data from the German National Hospital Discharge Registry (International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10) between 2002 and 2017. Total count, incidences and percentage changes of the following fracture localizations were analysed: proximal humerus, distal humerus, proximal ulna, proximal radius, ulna diaphysis (including Monteggia lesion) and distal radius. Ten age groups for men and women were formed: 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74; 75-84; 85-90, and > 90 (years). RESULTS: The total count of proximal humeral fractures increased from 40,839 (2002, men/women 9967/30,872) to 59,545 (2017, men/women 14,484/45,061). Distal humeral fractures increased from 5912 (2002, men/women 1559/4353) to 6493 (2017, men/women1840/4653). The total count of forearm fractures increased from 68,636 (2002, men/women 17,186/51,450) to 89,040 (2017, men/women 20,185/68,855). Women were affected in 70-75% of all cases with rising incidences among nearly every age group in female patients. CONCLUSION: Total count of nearly every evaluated fracture increased. Also, incidences increased especially in the older female age groups. Fracture development already seems to reflect demographic changes in Germany.

[Combined posterior and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : Arthroscopic treatment with the GraftLink® system]. / Kombinierte Rekonstruktion des hinteren und vorderen Kreuzbandes : Arthroskopische Versorgung mit dem GraftLink®-System.

OBJECTIVE: Simultaneous arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior and/or posterior cruciate ligament (ACL/PCL) using the GraftLink® system (Arthrex) to obtain stable treatment and good functional results. The transplant is protected by the safety belt like biomechanical GraftLink® principle, which is used to secure the intraoperatively obtained stability in the long term. INDICATIONS: ACL, PCL, or combined cruciate ligament rupture, especially multiligament injuries. Revision ACL and PCL reconstruction. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Preoperative fixed posterior tibial subluxation. Reduced range of motion (ROM) with an extension lag (extension/flexion 0­0-120° preoperatively required). Complex regional pain syndrome. High-grade atrophy of the quadriceps femoris muscle and osseous deformities. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Supine position with mobile leg and possible flexion of at least 120° allowing antegrade femoral bone tunnel replacement. Retrograde tunnel placement (e. g. using a retrocutter) is recommended in case of less than 120° knee flexion. Thigh tourniquet. Staging arthroscopy. Cruciate ligament reconstruction is realized by anatomic tunnel placement for the ACL/PCL using the GraftLink®. Recommended sequence of reconstruction: 1. tibial PCL tunnel, 2. femoral ACL tunnel, 3. femoral PCL tunnel, 4. tibial ACL tunnel. Hybrid fixation is recommended. Portals: High anteromedial, high anterolateral, posteromedial, posterolateral, small subvastus incision. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Combined cruciate ligament replacement: Gradual load and ROM increase in the PCL track. After postoperative week 5, increasing load up to full weight bearing, with extension/flexion 0­0-90° after week 7. Down training of the PCL track after week 13. Contact and competitive sports after 1 year. RESULTS: The GraftLink® system allows restoration of knee joint stability with good functional results. The procedure is especially suitable for complex situations like after knee dislocation with ACL and PCL reconstruction in 1 or 2 steps.

[Periprosthetic Acetabulum Fractures]. / Periprothetische Azetabulumfrakturen.

In contrast to periprosthetic fractures of the femur, periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum are rare complications - both primary fractures and fractures in revision surgery. This topic is largely under-reported in the literature; there are a few case reports and no long term results. Due to an increase in life expectancy, the level of patients' activity and the number of primary joint replacements, one has to expect a rise in periprosthetic complications in general and periprosthetic acetabular fractures in particular. This kind of fracture can be intra-, peri- or postoperative. Intraoperative fractures are especially associated with insertion of cementless press-fit acetabular components or revision surgery. Postoperative periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum are usually related to osteolysis, for example, due to polyethylene wear. There are also traumatic fractures and fractures missed intraoperatively that lead to some kind of insufficiency fracture. Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum are treated conservatively if the implant is stable and the fracture is not dislocated. If surgery is needed, there are many possible different surgical techniques and challenging approaches. That is why periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum should be treated by experts in pelvic surgery as well as revision arthroplasty and the features specific to the patient, fracture and prosthetic must always be considered.