RESUMO
Underage patients with Borderline Personality Pathology (BPP) are in need of specialised psychotherapeutic treatment. A handful of these treatments, including Adolescent Identity Treatment (AIT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (DBT-A), have been adapted for adolescent patients. Psychotherapy research has shown that the outcome of different psychotherapeutic approaches can be very similar despite conceptual and practical differences between the theoretical models. Therefore, to understand what really works in psychotherapy, it is necessary to investigate the psychotherapeutic process and its effects on the patient. This paper presents a study design for process-outcome research, integrating (1) a classical outcome design, comparing AIT and DBT-A in a non-inferiority trial assessing changes in psychosocial functioning at 12 months after baseline as primary outcome; and (2) a process research design, addressing multiple BPP and psychotherapy relevant factors. These factors include well-studied generic variables such as the psychotherapeutic alliance, more recent approaches such as video-based identification of significant therapeutic events, as well as more experimental approaches such as psychophysiological markers measured during the therapeutic sessions. The use of repeated measures and the methodological pluralism which includes event and micro-process analyses has been recommended for psychotherapy research aiming at a better understanding of the interplay of factors at work to narrow the gap between research and practice in this field.
RESUMO
A paradigm shift towards early detection and intervention of personality disorders in adolescence to prevent persistent and chronic suffering is currently taking place. Aside further distinct areas of impaired psychosocial integrity, disturbed identity development is seen as one core component of personality disorders. Thus, the detection of early antecedents of impaired identity development is an important step to allow for early intervention. The self-report questionnaire Assessment of Identity Development in Adolescence (AIDA) is a reliable and valid diagnostic instrument to detect disturbed identity development. This questionnaire allows for global assessment of identity and a differentiation in fundamental subdomains as well and distinguishes between identity diffusion on one side and consolidated and stable identity on the other. In clinical practice, it supports the differentiation between severely disturbed identity as the core component of personality disorders and identity crisis or stable identity development that can be found in other mental disorders.
