Facet Distraction and Dysphagia: A Prospective Evaluation of This Common Postoperative Issue Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Our primary study was to investigate whether the degree of postoperative facet and disk space distraction following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) affects the rate of postoperative dysphagia. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although ACDF is safe and well tolerated, postoperative dysphagia remains a common complication. Intervertebral disk space distraction is necessary in ACDF to visualize the operative field, prepare the endplates for fusion, and facilitate graft insertion. However, the degree of distraction tolerated, before onset of dysphagia, is not well characterized ACDF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted of 70 patients who underwent ACDF between June 2018 and January 2019. Two independent reviewers measured all preoperative and postoperative radiographs measured for interfacet distraction distance and intervertebral distraction distance, with intrareviewer reproducibility measurements after one month. For multilevel surgery, the level with the greatest distraction was measured. Primary outcomes were numerical dysphagia (0-10), Eating Assessment Tool 10, and Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire score collected at initial visit and two, six, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were prospectively enrolled, 59 of whom had adequate radiographs. An average of 1.71 (SD: 0.70) levels were included in the ACDF construct. Preoperatively, 13.4% of patients reported symptoms of dysphagia, which subsequently increased in the postoperative period at through 12 weeks postoperatively, before returning to baseline at 24 weeks. Intrareviewer and interreviewer reliability analysis demonstrated strong agreement. There was no relationship between interfacet distraction distance/intervertebral distraction distance and dysphagia prevalence, numerical rating, Eating Assessment Tool 10, or Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had an ACDF have an increased risk of dysphagia in the short term, however, this resolved without intervention by six months. Our data suggests increased facet and intervertebral disk distraction does not influence postoperative dysphagia rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Stoma size critical to 12-month outcomes in endoscopic suturing for gastric bypass repair.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure. However, weight regain after RYGB is common and often associated with pouch and stoma dilation. Historically, revision surgery has a greater risk of morbidity and mortality than the primary procedure. Endoscopic repair appears to be a safer option; however, current knowledge is limited regarding the longer term outcomes. Our objective was to prospectively collect the 12-month post-RYGB outcomes data after repair of dilated gastric tissue with an incisionless tissue approximation system in an open-label, single-group study at 9 U.S. sites. METHODS: Adults ≥ 2 years after RYGB, with weight regain and pouch and/or stoma dilation underwent tissue plication with an endolumenal anchoring system to tighten dilated gastric tissue. The outcomes were captured, with statistical modeling used to identify the predictors of success. RESULTS: Of the 116 subjects, 112 (97%) had anchors successfully placed (mean 5.9 anchors/subject). The mean stoma diameter and pouch length after the procedure was 11.5 mm (50% reduction) and 3.3 cm (44% reduction), respectively. At 12 months after repair (n = 73), the mean weight loss and percentage of excess weight loss was 5.9 ± 1.1 kg and 14.5% ± 3.1%, respectively. Anchor presence was confirmed endoscopically in 61 (92%) of 66 patients at 1 year. Those with a dilated stoma (>12 mm) who had a postrepair diameter of <10 mm (n = 22, 30% of 66) had more than double the excess weight loss compared with the rest of the cohort (24% versus 10%, P = .03). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: The 12-month outcomes have demonstrated the safety and durability of this method of gastric bypass repair. Aggressive reduction of stoma dilation was associated with superior weight loss.

Incisionless revision of post-Roux-en-Y bypass stomal and pouch dilation: multicenter registry results.

BACKGROUND: Surgical revision for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been tempered by the high complication rates associated with standard approaches. Endoluminal revision of stoma and pouch dilation should intuitively confer a better risk profile. However, questions of clinical safety, durability, and weight loss need to be answered. We report our multicenter intraoperative experience and postoperative follow-up to date using the Incisionless Operating Platform for this patient subset. METHODS: The patients who had regained significant weight >or=2 years after RYGB after losing >or=50% of excess body weight after RYGB were endoscopically screened for stomal and/or pouch dilation. Qualified patients underwent incisionless revision using the Incisionless Operating Platform to reduce the stoma and pouch size by placing anchors to create tissue plications. Data on the safety, intraoperative performance, postoperative weight loss, and anchor durability were recorded to date as a part of 2 years of postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 116 consecutive patients were prospectively studied. Anchors were successfully placed in 112 (97%) of 116 patients, with an average intraoperative stoma diameter and pouch length reduction of 50% and 44%, respectively. The operating room time averaged 87 minutes. No significant complications occurred. At 6 months after the procedure (n = 96), an average of 32% of weight regain that had occurred after RYGB had been lost. The percentage of excess weight loss averaged 18%. The 12-month esophagogastroduodenoscopy results confirmed the presence of the anchors and durable tissue folds. CONCLUSIONS: Incisionless revision of stoma and pouch dilation using the Incisionless Operating Platform can be performed safely. The data to date have demonstrated mild-to-moderate weight loss, and the early 12-month endoscopic images have confirmed anchor durability. Patients were actively followed up to document the long-term durability of this intervention in the entire patient subset.

Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients: a response.

BACKGROUND: The recent article by Guller, Klein, Hagen was reviewed and discussed by the authors of this response to critically analyze the validity of the conclusions, at a time when patients and providers depend on peer reviewed data to guide their health care choices. The authors of this response all have high volume bariatric surgery practices encompassing experience with both gastric bypass and gastric banding, and have made significant contributions to the peer reviewed literature. We examined the assumptions of the paper, reviewed the main articles cited, provided more evidence from articles that were included in the materials and methods of the paper, but not cited, and challenge the conclusion that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The paper by Guller et al was subject to significant bias. The authors did not demonstrate an understanding of gastric banding, selectively included data with unfavorable results towards gastric banding, did not provide equal critique to the literature on gastric bypass, and deliberately excluded much of the favorable data on gastric banding. CONCLUSION: The paper's conclusion that gastric bypass is the procedure of choice is biased, unsubstantiated, not supported by the current literature and represents a disservice to the scientific and health care community.