Effects of large-scale gold mining on habitat use and selection by American pronghorn.

Anthropogenic disturbances, including extraction of natural resources and development of alternative energy, are reducing and fragmenting habitat for wildlife across the globe. Effects of those disturbances have been explored by studying populations that migrate through oil and gas fields or alternative energy facilities. Extraction of minerals, including precious metals and lithium, is increasing rapidly in remote areas, which results in dramatically altered landscapes in areas of resident populations of wildlife. Our goal was to examine how a resident population of American pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) in the Great Basin ecosystem selected resources near a large-scale disturbance year around. We investigated how individuals selected resources around a large, open-pit gold mine. We classified levels of disturbance associated with the mine, and used a random forest model to select ecological covariates associated with habitat selection by pronghorn. We used resource selection functions to examine how disturbances affected habitat selection by pronghorn both annually and seasonally. Pronghorn strongly avoided areas of high disturbance, which included open pits, heap leach fields, rock disposal areas, and a tram. Pronghorn selected areas near roads, although selection was strongest about 2 km away. We observed relatively broad variation among individuals in selection of resources, and how they responded to the mine. The Great Basin is a mineral-rich area that continues to be exploited for natural resources, especially minerals. Sagebrush-dependent species, including pronghorn, that rely on this critical habitat were directly affected by that transformation of the landscape, which is likely to increase with expansion of the mine. As extraction of minerals from remote landscapes around the world continues to fragment habitats for wildlife, increasing our understanding of impacts of those changes on behaviors of wildlife before populations decline, may assist in the mitigation and minimization of negative impacts on mineral-rich landscapes and on wildlife populations.

Recolonizing carnivores: Is cougar predation behaviorally mediated by bears?

Conservation and management efforts have resulted in population increases and range expansions for some apex predators, potentially changing trophic cascades and foraging behavior. Changes in sympatric carnivore and dominant scavenger populations provide opportunities to assess how carnivores affect one another. Cougars (Puma concolor) were the apex predator in the Great Basin of Nevada, USA, for over 80 years. Black bears (Ursus americanus) have recently recolonized the area and are known to heavily scavenge on cougar kills. To evaluate the impacts of sympatric, recolonizing bears on cougar foraging behavior in the Great Basin, we investigated kill sites of 31 cougars between 2009 and 2017 across a range of bear densities. We modeled the variation in feeding bout duration (number of nights spent feeding on a prey item) and the proportion of primary prey, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), in cougar diets using mixed-effects models. We found that feeding bout duration was driven primarily by the size of the prey item being consumed, local bear density, and the presence of dependent kittens. The proportion of mule deer in cougar diet across all study areas declined over time, was lower for male cougars, increased with the presence of dependent kittens, and increased with higher bear densities. In sites with feral horses (Equus ferus), a novel large prey, cougar consumption of feral horses increased over time. Our results suggest that higher bear densities over time may reduce cougar feeding bout durations and influence the prey selection trade-off for cougars when alternative, but more dangerous, large prey are available. Shifts in foraging behavior in multicarnivore systems can have cascading effects on prey selection. This study highlights the importance of measuring the impacts of sympatric apex predators and dominant scavengers on a shared resource base, providing a foundation for monitoring dynamic multipredator/scavenger systems.

Evidence of Bovine viral diarrhea virus Infection in Three Species of Sympatric Wild Ungulates in Nevada: Life History Strategies May Maintain Endemic Infections in Wild Populations.

Evidence for bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) infection was detected in 2009-2010 while investigating a pneumonia die-off in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis, canadensis), and sympatric mountain goats (Oreamnos americanum) in adjacent mountain ranges in Elko County, Nevada. Seroprevalence to BVDV-1 was 81% (N = 32) in the bighorns and 100% (N = 3) in the mountain goats. Serosurveillance from 2011 to 2015 of surviving bighorns and mountain goats as well as sympatric mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), indicated a prevalence of 72% (N = 45), 45% (N = 51), and 51% (N = 342) respectively. All species had antibody titers to BVDV1 and BVDV2. BVDV1 was isolated in cell culture from three bighorn sheep and a mountain goat kid. BVDV2 was isolated from two mule deer. Six deer (N = 96) sampled in 2013 were positive for BVDV by antigen-capture ELISA on a single ear notch. Wild ungulates and cattle concurrently graze public and private lands in these two mountain ranges, thus providing potential for interspecies viral transmission. Like cattle, mule deer, mountain goats, and bighorn sheep can be infected with BVDV and can develop clinical disease including immunosuppression. Winter migration patterns that increase densities and species interaction during the first and second trimester of gestation may contribute to the long term maintenance of the virus in these wild ungulates. More studies are needed to determine the population level impacts of BVDV infection on these three species.