The potential of multi-slice computed tomography based volumetry for demonstrating reverse remodeling induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) was proved to provide precise cardiac volumetric assessment. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for selected patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). In HFREF patients we investigated the potential of MSCT based wall motion analysis in order to demonstrate CRT-induced reversed remodeling. METHODS: Besides six patients with normal cardiac pump function serving as control group seven HFREF patients underwent contrast enhanced MSCT before and after CRT. Short cardiac axis views of the left ventricle (LV) in end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) served for planimetry. Pre- and post-CRT MSCT based volumetry was compared with 2D echo. To demonstrate CRT-induced reverse remodeling, MSCT based multi-segment color-coded polar maps were introduced. RESULTS: With regard to the HFREF patients pre-CRT MSCT based volumetry correlated with 2D echo data for LV-EDV (MSCT 278.3+/-75.0mL vs. echo 274.4+/-85.6mL) r=0.380, p=0.401, LV-ESV (MSCT 226.7+/-75.4mL vs. echo 220.1+/-74.0mL) r=0.323, p=0.479 and LV-EF (MSCT 20.2+/-8.8% vs. echo 20.0+/-11.9%) r=0.617, p=0.143. Post-CRT MSCT correlated well with 2D echo: LV-EDV (MSCT 218.9+/-106.4mL vs. echo 188.7+/-93.1mL) r=0.87, p=0.011, LV-ESV (MSCT 145+/-71.5mL vs. echo 125.6+/-78mL) r=0.84, p=0.018 and LV-EF (MSCT 29.6+/-11.3mL vs. echo 38.6+/-14.6mL) r=0.89, p=0.007. There was a significant increase of the mid-ventricular septum in terms of absolute LV wall thickening of the responders (pre 0.9+/-2.1mm vs. post 3.3+/-2.2mm; p<0.0005). CONCLUSION: MSCT based volumetry involving multi-segment color-coded polar maps offers wall motion analysis to demonstrate CRT-induced reverse remodeling which needs to be further validated.

Cardiac volumetry in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a comparative study correlating multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance tomography. Reasons for intermodal disagreement.

BACKGROUND: In humans with normal hearts multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) based volumetry was shown to correlate well with the gold standard, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We correlated both techniques in patients with various degrees of heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) resulting from cardiac dilatation. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with a left ventricular enddiastolic volume (LV-EDV) of C 150 ml measured by angiography underwent MSCT and CMR scanning for left and right ventricular (LV, RV) volumetry. MSCT based short cardiac axis views were obtained beginning at the cardiac base advancing to the apex. These were reconstructed in 20 different time windows of the RR-interval (0-95%) serving for identification of enddiastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) and for planimetry. ED and ES volumes and the ejection fraction (EF) were calculated for LV and RV. MSCT based volumetry was compared with CMR. RESULTS: MSCT based LV volumetry significantly correlates with CMR as follows: LV-EDV r = 0.94, LV-ESV r = 0.98 and LV-EF r = 0.93, but significantly overestimates LV-EDV and LV-ESV and underestimates EF (P \ 0.0001). MSCT based RV volumetry significantly correlates with CMR as follows: RV-EDV r = 0.79, RVESV r = 0.78 and RV-EF r = 0.73, but again significantly overestimates RV-EDV and RV-ESV and underestimates RV-EF (P \ 0.0001). CONCLUSION: When compared with CMR a continuous overestimation of volumes and underestimation of EF needs to be considered when applying MSCT in HFREF patients.