Moderate or Severe Functional MR and Severe AS: Is Mitral Valve Surgery Justified?

OBJECTIVE: Mitral regurgitation (MR) and severe aortic valve stenosis often coexist. Concomitant replacement of both valves is associated with a significantly higher morbidity and mortality. This study sought to investigate the progression of MR after isolated aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We analyzed the severity and progression of MR, survival and echocardiographic parameters in 506 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and moderate to severe functional MR who received isolated aortic valve replacement during a 9-year period. RESULTS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was performed in 381 patients and 125 patients received surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The median age of the cohort was 82 years. Median ejection fraction before and after TAVI or SAVR was 35 and 36% respectively (p = 0.64). There was a statistically significant reduction in the MR (p < 0.001) within both groups. Survival in both groups at 5 years was at 25%. CONCLUSION: Isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with accompanying moderate to severe functional MR may present an adequate treatment option for this high-risk patient collective.

Efficacy of Vascular Closure Devices in Closing Large-Bore Sheath Arterial Sites after Treatment with Extracorporeal Life Support System.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively evaluated vascular complications and wound infections after surgical or percutaneous transfemoral removal of temporary extracorporeal life support systems (ECLSs). METHODS: A total of 83 patients were weaned from ECLS between August 2015 and September 2020. We analyzed for a composite endpoint of vascular complications and wound infections requiring negative-pressure wound therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: percutaneous group using the MANTA vascular occlusion system (VCD; Teleflex, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States) (n = 23) and surgical group (n = 60). RESULTS: The median age in the entire cohort was 67 years. Vascular complications were seen in 20% (n = 12) in the surgical group and in 13% (n = 3) in the percutaneous group (p = 0.72). A total of 32% (n = 19) in the surgical group and 9% (n = 2) in the percutaneous group (p = 0.031) had wound infections. A composite endpoint of vascular complications and wound infections showed significantly more complications in the surgical group (52%, n = 31) as compared with the percutaneous group (22%, n = 5) (p = 0.020). The median duration in the intensive care unit was 13 days for the surgical group and 12 days for the percutaneous group without any significant difference in both groups (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Using the MANTA VCD for percutaneous removal of ECLS cannulas after weaning from ECLS is safe and reproducible. A composite endpoint of vascular complications and wound infections was significantly lower in the percutaneous removal group as compared with the surgical group.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated aortic bioprostheses: are patients with small surgical bioprostheses at higher risk for unfavourable mid-term outcomes?

BACKGROUND: To examine outcomes of valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) according to the inner diameter (ID) of the degenerated aortic valve bioprosthesis. METHODS: We analyzed survival, stroke, permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, paravalvular (PV) leakage, acute kidney injury and vascular complications in fifty-nine patients during a ten-year period. Patients were stratified according to the ID of the indwelling degenerated biological aortic valve (true ID ≤ and >20 mm). Differences in post-procedural transvalvular gradients and hospital re-admissions were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age of the small diameter group and large diameter group was eighty-one and eighty years, respectively. Median logistic EuroSCORE I was 23.9% and 26.2% and median Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 5.7% and 7.8% for the small and large groups, respectively. Survival, stroke, PPM implantation, PV leakage, acute kidney injury and vascular complications did not reach any statistically significant difference between both groups. Postprocedural transvalvular gradients differed significantly according to the true ID of the degenerated bioprosthetic valve and consequently of the respective TAVI valve. There was a significant difference with regard to hospital readmissions according to the true ID. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI ViV implantation for aortic bioprostheses with small true IDs of ≤20 mm is associated with comparable mid-term mortality and periprocedural stroke rate compared to implantation into larger bioprostheses. However, the periprocedural and mid-term transvalvular gradients, as well as hospital re-admission rates are significantly higher in the small diameter group.

The association of diabetes mellitus treated with oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin with mortality after transcatheter valve implantation: a 3-year follow-up of the TAVIK registry.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) on insulin is a patient-related factor in the assessment of surgical risk based on the EuroSCORE II and, as such, it confers additional risk on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of diabetes mellitus treated with insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs on clinical outcomes after TAVI. METHODS: This study is an analysis of 2000 patients who underwent TAVI between 2008 and 2015. Patients were stratified post hoc into the following categories: without diabetes (n = 1337), with diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD; n = 387) and with diabetes treated using insulin (n = 276). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in device success (89.5% vs 89.4% vs 88.8%, adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-1.91]) and VARC-2-defined major complications among the three groups of patients (without DM, OAD, and insulin, respectively). Minor but not major or disabling strokes (adjOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.11-4.3) and overall renal complications (but not stage 2/3 alone) (adjOR 1.46; 95% CI 1.18-1.81) were more common in patients with diabetes than in those without diabetes. Insulin-treated patients had a significantly lower survival rate than that of patients with orally treated diabetes and of those without diabetes at 1 year (75.7% vs. 84.5% vs 84.7%, pairwise p < 0.01) and 3 years (56.9% vs. 65.9% vs. 67.9%, adj. p < 0.05) after TAVI. However, insulin-treated diabetes was not identified as an independent risk factor for higher mortality in the first (HR 1.29; 95% CI 0.97-1.72, p = 0.084) and 3rd years (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.98-1.49; p = 0.079) after multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Although insulin-dependent DM is an established component of surgical risk assessment, it was not identified as an independent factor associated with reduced survival in TAVI. DM treated with oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin may have less role in decision making of treatment in TAVI candidates.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the ACURATE TA™ system: 1-year outcomes and comparison of 500 patients from the SAVI registries.

OBJECTIVES: The ACURATE TA TM system is a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve system designed for transapical access which has been proven to be safe and effective in the controlled setting of clinical trials. The SAVI-1 and SAVI-2 registries aimed to assess whether these promising outcomes can be translated into all-comers clinical routine. METHODS: From November 2011 to 2012 (SAVI-1), and November 2013 to 2014 (SAVI-2), a total of 500 patients were enrolled in the prospective, all-comers, multicentre, multinational SAVI registries. Patients were treated according to the standard of care at their respective hospitals. We report and compare 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes between SAVI-1 and -2. RESULTS: Patients were 80.8 ± 6.1 years old, the mean logistic EuroSCORE-I was 23.4 ± 14.3%. Valves were deployed under rapid pacing in 71.3% of the procedures in SAVI-1, and in 3.6% in SAVI-2. There was no relevant difference in clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between SAVI-1 and SAVI-2. Overall mortality at 30 days and 1 year was 6.8% and 19.9%, the stroke rate was 2.2% and 3.7%, respectively; 10.2% of patients had received a permanent pacemaker, and no transcatheter valve-related complications after discharge were observed. Paravalvular leakage ≥2+ was reported in 1.9% of the patients at the early follow-up, and in 2.6% at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The SAVI-registries have confirmed that transapical implantation using the ACURATE TA TM device is safe and effective in an all-comers setting with low complication rates and stable performance outcomes at short-term and 1 year; outcomes were similar between SAVI-1 and -2.

One-year multicentre outcomes of transapical aortic valve implantation using the SAPIEN XT™ valve: the PREVAIL transapical study.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate 1-year outcomes of the multicentre PREVAIL transapical (TA) study of TA-aortic valve implantation (AVI) in high-risk patients. METHODS: From September 2009 to August 2010, a total of 150 patients, aged 81.6 ± 5.8 years, 40.7% female, were included at 12 European TA-AVI experienced sites. Patients received 23 (n = 36), 26 (n = 57) and 29 mm (n = 57) second-generation SAPIEN XT™ (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) valves. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 24.3 ± 7.0, and mean Society Thoracic Surgeons score was 7.5 ± 4.4%. RESULTS: Survival was 91.3% at 30 days and 77.9% at 1 year. Subgroup analysis revealed survivals of 91.7/88.9, 86.0/70.2, 96.55/91.2% for patients receiving 23-, 26- and 29-mm valves at 30 days and at 1 year, respectively. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and low gradients. Aortic incompetence was none in 41/48, trace 30/36, mild 22/12 and moderate in 7/4% at discharge and 1 year. Walking distance increased from 221 (postimplant) to 284 m (at 1 year, P = 0.0004). Three patients required reoperation due to increasing aortic incompetence during follow-up. Causes of mortality at 1 year were cardiac (n = 7), stroke (n = 1) and others (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: The European PREVAIL multicentre trial demonstrates good functionality and good outcomes for TA-AVI using the second-generation SAPIEN XT prosthesis and the ASCENDRA-II delivery system. The 29-mm SAPIEN XT valve was successfully introduced and showed excellent results.

Transapical aortic valve implantation: mid-term outcome from the SOURCE registry.

OBJECTIVES: Transapical (TA) aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis was commercially introduced in Europe in January 2008. Limited data on the mid-term results are available. METHODS: Using data from the SOURCE-Registry (largest consecutive cohort treated using Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis in Europe), we report on the mid-term results (≥30 days-2 years) of TA patients. RESULTS: Between November 2007 and December 2009, a total of 1387 patients from 38 European centres underwent TA aortic valve implantation. The mean follow-up is 14.9 months, with 1004 patients who completed 1 year and 464 patients who completed the 2-year follow-up. The mean age of patients was 80.6 ± 7.1 years with a logistic-EuroSCORE of 27.6%. The main co-morbidities were coronary artery disease (55.8%), previous bypass grafting (25.5%), porcelain aorta (10.2%), previous stroke (6.5%) and peripheral vascular disease (26.4%). A total of 840 patients (60.6%) received a 26 mm and 535 (38.6%) a 23 mm Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis. Survivals at 30 days, 1 year and 2 years were 88.7, 73.8 and 65.1%, respectively. Causes of the 276 deaths observed between >30 days and 2-year follow-up were cardiac in 86 patients (31.2%), non-cardiac in 142 (51.4%) and unknown in 48 (17.4%). Cardiac causes of death included heart failure (33.7%), sudden cardiac death (33.7%), myocardial infarct (8.1%), endocarditis (5.8%) and others (18.6%). Non-cardiac deaths were related to pulmonary disease (21.1%), cancer (12.7%), renal failure (11.3%), stroke (10.6%), gastrointestinal disease (7.7%) and others (36.6%). Using univariable and multivariable analyses, logistic EuroSCORE, renal insufficiency and liver diseases were identified as independent predictors of 2-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that in elderly patients with severe co-morbidities, TA aortic valve implantation results in excellent mid-term results. Causes of death during the mid-term follow-up are mainly non-cardiac and related to co-morbidities.

Worldwide experience with the 29-mm Edwards SAPIEN XT™ transcatheter heart valve in patients with large aortic annulus.

OBJECTIVES: The feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation is limited by the diameter of the aortic annulus. Patients with an annulus of >25 mm were previously unsuitable for transcatheter valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN™ bioprosthesis. The 29-mm Edwards SAPIEN XT™ bioprosthesis is a new device suitable for transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with a large aortic annulus. We report the worldwide experience in using this device. METHODS: A total of 120 patients (age 80.3 ± 5.7 years, 2.5% female) underwent transapical aortic valve implantation using a 29-mm Edwards SAPIEN XT™ bioprosthesis between the period of December 2009 and February 2011. The mean values of the logistic EuroSCORE and the STS score were 23.4 ± 7.7 and 6.8 ± 4.0, respectively. A total of 20 centres participated in this study and all patients gave written informed consent. RESULTS: There were two conversions to open heart surgery (1.7%) and four patients (3.3%) required a temporary cardiopulmonary bypass support. A mean of 131 ± 68.0-ml contrast dye was used. The procedural success, defined as one valve implanted, no aortic regurgitation (AR) >2+ and a transcatheter valve in the appropriate position, was achieved in 95.8% of patients. Early postoperative complications at ≤ 30 days included renal failure requiring temporary dialysis (n = 7, 5.8%), reopening for bleeding (n = 5, 4.2%), stroke (n = 2, 1.7%), respiratory complications requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (n = 11, 9.2%) and postoperative pacemaker implantation (n = 15/12.5%). The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 95.8% at 30-day, 88.9% at 6-month and 79.8% at the 1-year follow-up. The controlled echocardiography data at 30 days (n = 95) revealed no/trivial AR in 79 (84.1%), mild AR in 12 (12.8%) and moderate in two (2.2%) patients. The univariable analysis of baseline characteristics revealed no predictor for 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The 29-mm Edwards SAPIEN XT™ bioprosthesis provides an excellent outcome in patients with a large aortic annulus undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation. Using this larger transcatheter heart valve, a broader population of high-risk elderly patients with aortic stenosis can be treated by minimally invasive transapical implantation techniques.

Aortoiliac CT angiography for planning transcutaneous aortic valve implantation: aortic root anatomy and frequency of clinically significant incidental findings.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to assess aortic root and iliofemoral vessel anatomy and the frequency of clinically significant incidental findings on aortoiliac CT angiography (CTA) performed for planning of transcutaneous aortic valve implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortoiliac CTA studies of 207 patients scheduled for transcutaneous aortic valve implantation were analyzed. Anatomic dimensions relevant to the interventional procedure, including diameter of the aortic annulus and sinus of Valsalva, distance between aortic annulus and coronary ostia, coronary leaflet length, left ventricular outflow tract diameter, and vessel diameter of iliac arteries, were analyzed. Clinically significant incidental findings were recorded. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) maximum and minimum diameters of the aortic annulus were 29 ± 3.9 mm and 23.5 ± 4.1 mm, respectively. The mean distances between aortic annulus and the ostium of the left and right coronary artery were 13.5 ± 3.2 mm and 14.8 ± 3.9 mm, respectively. The mean maximum and minimum diameters of the left ventricular outflow tract were 27 ± 4 mm and 1.9 ± 4 mm, respectively. The mean diameter of the sinus of Valsalva was 33.4 ± 5.1 mm. The mean diameters of the right and left external iliac artery were 8 ± 1 and 8 ± 2 mm, respectively. Almost half the patients (101/207) had clinically significant incidental findings, including noncalcified pulmonary nodules larger than 8 mm (n = 7), pulmonary embolism (n = 3), or aortic aneurysm (n = 12). CONCLUSION: Aortoiliac CTA provides relevant information on aortic root and iliofemoral vessel anatomy for preinterventional planning. CTA reveals clinically significant incidental findings in a high number of patients considered for transcutaneous aortic valve implantation, which may have a significant impact on patient selection.

PREVAIL TRANSAPICAL: multicentre trial of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the newly designed bioprosthesis (SAPIEN-XT) and delivery system (ASCENDRA-II).

OBJECTIVES: Transapical (TA) aortic valve implantation (AVI) has evolved as an alternative procedure for high-risk patients. We evaluated the second-generation SAPIEN XT™ prosthesis in a prospective multicentre clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 150 patients (age: 81.6 ± 5.8 years; 40.7% female) were included. Prosthetic valves (diameter: 23 mm (n = 36), 26 mm (n = 57) and 29 mm (n = 57)) were implanted. The ASCENDRA-II™ modified delivery system was used in the smaller sizes. Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 24.3 ± 7.0%, and mean STS score 7.5 ± 4.4%. All patients gave written informed consent. RESULTS: Off-pump AVI was performed using femoral arterial and venous access wires as a safety net. All but two patients received TA-AVI, as planned. The 29-mm valve showed similar function as the values of two other diameters did. Three patients (2%) required temporary cardiopulmonary bypass support. Postoperative complications included renal failure requiring long-term dialysis in four, bleeding requiring rethoracotomy in four, respiratory complication requiring reintubation in eight and sepsis in four patients, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 13 (8.7%) for the total cohort and 2/57 (3.5%) for patients receiving the 29-mm valve, respectively. Echocardiography at discharge showed none or trivial aortic incompetence (AI) in 71% and mild-AI in 22% of the patients. Post-implantation AI was predominantly paravalvular and ≥ 2+ in 7% of patients. One patient required reoperation for AI within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: The PREVAIL TA multicentre trial demonstrates good functionality and good outcomes for TA-AVI, using the SAPIEN XT™ prosthesis and its second-generation ASCENDRA-II™ delivery system, as well successful introduction of the 29-mm SAPIEN XT™ valve for the benefit of high-risk elderly patients.

The SOURCE Registry: what is the learning curve in trans-apical aortic valve implantation?

OBJECTIVE: Trans-apical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) has been shown to be a reproducible technique. Early results from the SAPIEN Aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry identified major access complications associated with high 30-day mortality. Using the SOURCE Registry, we analyze the learning curve for TA-AVI over the first 2 years after commercialization. METHODS: The SOURCE Registry gathered data for 2 consecutive years at European centers following commercialization of the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis, totaling 2339 patients (1038 in COHORT 1 and 1301 in COHORT 2). Only data from centers that provided all of their consecutively treated patients were included in this study. We compared the 30-day results of TA-AVI from COHORT 1 (C-1: January/2008-January/2009) with the 30-day results of COHORT 2 (C-2: February/2009-January/2010). RESULTS: This analysis is based on a total number of 575 TA-AVIs in C-1 and 819 TA-AVIs in C-2. Mean age (C-1: 80.7 years, C-2: 80.5 years) and logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) (C-1: 29.1%, C-2 27.3%) were not significantly different. Valve malposition (C-1: 1.6%, C-2: 1.2%), valve migration/embolization (C-1: 0.5%, C-2: 1.0%), and major access complications (C-1: 2.1%, C-2: 1.8%) were in total less frequent, but not statistically significant lower in C-2. However, the reduction of aortic regurgitation >2+ immediately following the procedure (C-1: 4.52%, C-2: 2.1%, p=0.011) and conversion rate to open surgery (C-1: 3.7%, C-2: 1.5%, p=0.0315) reached statistical significance. Postoperative complications included dialysis (C-1: 7.0%, C-2: 5.7%, p=ns), pacemaker implantation (C-2: 7.7%, C-2: 6.7%, p=ns), stroke (C-1: 2.4%, C-2: 2.6%, p=ns), and myocardial infarct (C-1: 0.7%, C-2: 0.4%, p=ns). The total 30-day mortality was 10.8% and not significantly different between the two groups (C-1: 10.8%, C-2: 10.7%, p=ns). CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of technical intra procedural complications has trended downward, reflecting the learning curve for TA-AVI, 30-day mortality was unchanged, likely due to patient co-morbidities not captured by preoperative risk variables.

Trans-apical aortic valve implantation: univariate and multivariate analyses of the early results from the SOURCE registry.

OBJECTIVE: Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation is an alternative treatment option for patients facing high risk for aortic valve replacement. Currently, the results of trans-apical trans-catheter procedures performed outside controlled trials are unknown. METHODS: The Edwards SAPIEN Aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry collects data of patients treated at European centres during the first year following commercialisation of the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis. Only data from centres that could provide 100% of their consecutively treated patients (n=32) were included in the study population. This article provides the 30-day outcome data involving the trans-apical patients, including univariate and multivariate risk analyses for postoperative 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The interim results are based on a total number of 575 procedures performed between January 2008 and 31 January 2009. Mean age at implant was 80.7 years, and patients had a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 29.1%. Baseline characteristics included coronary artery disease 56%, prior coronary intervention 27.1%, prior coronary bypass grafting 26.9%, concomitant mitral valve disease 32.8%, porcelain aorta 11.5%, peripheral vascular disease 27.5%, prior stroke 6.3% and pulmonary disease 29.4%. Successful valve deployment was observed in 92.7% with a 3.5% conversion rate to open surgery, incidence of coronary obstruction of 0.7% and valve embolisation of 0.5%. The incidence of aortic regurgitation in excess of 2+ was 2.3% immediately following the procedure. The incidence of major postoperative complications included bleeding requiring re-operation 2.1%, dialysis 7.1%, pacemaker implantation 7.3%, stroke 2.6%, major vascular complications 2.4% and myocardial infarction 0.7%. The total 30-day mortality was 10.3%. Logistic EuroSCORE > or =30% and missing ejection fraction were found to be the only independent predictors for 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that although trans-apical trans-catheter aortic valve implantation is a complex surgical technique, the learning curve can be minimised by appropriate training programmes. Very high logistic EuroSCOREs predict inferior survival and make it likely that in this subgroup of patients there may be some who, despite having had a successful trans-catheter aortic valve implantation procedure, do not benefit in the midterm.