Is cross-sectional imaging necessary for fractures of the distal lower leg in children and adolescents: results of a nationwide survey.

PURPOSE: In childhood and adolescence, cross-sectional imaging, most commonly computed tomography (CT), is often performed for advanced diagnosis of joint injuries of the distal lower leg and upper ankle. Due to radiation exposure, the need for CT remains controversial, as these injuries follow stereotypies and usually have a similar course. Alternatively, the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also discussed. Since radiation sensitivity at this young age is much higher than in adults, an effort must be to minimize radiation exposure according to as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principles. The aim of this survey is to evaluate the current procedure in Germany in the diagnosis of pediatric injuries of the distal lower leg and upper ankle. METHODS: For data collection, a survey entitled "CT in fractures of the ankle joint in childhood and adolescence: subject of the survey are injuries between 8 and 15 years of age" of the Section of Pediatric Traumatology in the German Association of Trauma Surgery was sent to all members via the distribution list of the German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology and the distribution list of the German Society of Pediatric Surgery in a period from September 20, 2022-December 21, 2022. The survey included a total of 21 questions. Target groups were trauma and pediatric surgeons and orthopedic surgeons working in the hospital and in practice. RESULTS: A total of 525 participants took part in the survey: ultrasound diagnostics are used by almost 25% and the Ottawa Ankle Rules by over 50% always or in most cases. A conventional x-ray is always or most often used by over 90%. CT imaging is rarely used by 88.57%, mainly for surgical planning or analysis of fracture progression. 69.9% report that their radiology department uses a pediatric protocol for CT exams; 25.71% do not know if this is the case. MRI imaging is also used infrequently by 89.33%, mostly to identify associated injuries. Overall, CT imaging is chosen by 55.62% and MRI imaging by 35.24% as the sectional imaging modality for suspected fractures; 95.05% consider sectional imaging useful for a triplane fracture, 59.24% for a two-plane fracture, 41.71% for a Salter-Harris type III/IV injury, and 8% for a Salter-Harris type I/II injury. CONCLUSION: The survey showed that the conventional X-ray is still the gold standard. Interestingly, more than half of the respondents regularly use the Ottawa Ankle Rules, and diagnostics using ultrasound are also used by almost a quarter. Awareness of radiation protection in children exists, although a quarter of all participants do not know the extent to which their radiology department has a specific pediatric protocol for CT imaging. Cross-sectional imaging is performed on a regular basis. Regarding the actual extent of imaging, there is a clear divergence between theory and practice.

[Clavicle shaft fractures in childhood and adolescence : Consensus report of the Pediatric Traumatology Section of the German Society for Trauma Surgery]. / Claviculaschaftfrakturen im Kindes- und Jugendalter : Konsensusreport der Sektion Kindertraumatologie in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie.

INTRODUCTION: Clavicle shaft fractures are among the most common fractures in childhood and adolescence. In the past they were almost exclusively treated conservatively but in recent years there has been an increase in surgical treatment. Nevertheless, exact recommendations for the choice of diagnostics and for the treatment regimen do not yet exist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Therefore, our aim was to develop a consensus within the 7th scientific working meeting of the section for pediatric traumatology in the German Society for Trauma Surgery based on expert opinion. RESULTS: Single-plane radiographic imaging is considered the gold standard diagnostic tool. Children younger than 10 years are primarily treated conservatively, and the type of immobilization is secondary. In girls older than 12 years and boys older than 14 years, fractures dislocated by more than the shaft width and shortened by > 2 cm should be treated by open reduction and stabilized by osteosynthesis, followed by free-functional follow-up treatment. CONCLUSION: In addition to X­rays, diagnostics using ultrasound must be further established. Treatment continues to be primarily conservative, but surgical treatment is also important, especially in adolescents. If the indications are correct, a good outcome can be expected regardless of the choice of treatment.

Perioperative complications in osteotomies around the knee: a study in 858 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Eight hundred and fifty-eight consecutive osteotomies around the knee joint were analyzed retrospectively to detect intra- and early postoperative complications in a period of 4 weeks postoperative. Indications for osteotomy were unilateral gonarthritis or torsional deformities resulting in femoropatellar instability or anterior knee pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Etiology of deformity, technique and mode of correction and level of osteotomy were registered. Complications were detected and divided in minor complication (superficial wound infection, and deep-vein thrombosis) and major complication (compartment syndrome, deep infection, and vascular lesion). RESULTS: Fifteen major (1.7%) and 17 minor complications (2.0%) were detected: 5 vascular lesions (0.58%), 4 compartment syndromes (0.47%) and 6 deep infections (0.70%), 14 superficial wound infections (1.6%) and 3 deep-vein thrombosis (0.35%). In posttraumatic osteotomies and continuous corrections, risk for a superficial wound infection was significantly higher and with osteoclasia risk for vascular lesion was higher compared to osteotomy with oscillating saw. No difference was found for anatomical level of osteotomy and for the other complications in terms of etiology of deformity, technique of osteotomy and mode of correction. CONCLUSION: Osteotomy around the knee is a safe procedure in the treatment of unicompartmental gonarthritis in terms of intra- and postoperative complications. Major complications are rare. Pit falls for compartment syndromes (LCW and torsional corrections) have to kept in mind. There is no difference in frequency of complications between HTO and supracondylar osteotomies. Risk for superficial wound infection is higher in posttraumatic osteotomies and with continuous corrections. Osteoclasia contains a higher risk for vascular lesion compared to oscillating saw.

The Impact of Anatomical Predisposition and Mechanism of Trauma on Dislocation of the Patella: A Retrospective Analysis of 104 Cases.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether traumatic dislocation of the patella is provoked by the presence of predisposing factors and examine the role of the mechanism of injury. METHODS: Cases diagnosed with dislocation of the patella and covered by the workers' compensation program were identified and classified as traumatic based on insurance regulations. We examined predisposing factors (e.g., frontal axis, torsional deviation, trochlear dysplasia, patella alta) in case groups based on age at dislocation and trauma mechanism. Retrospective cohort study, level of evidence III. RESULTS: Our sample size comprised 104 cases, consisting of 54 children and 50 adults. The most common mechanism of injury in children and adults was rotational trauma. Only 20% of the children and 21% of the adults exhibited no relevant predisposing factors. Group specifically, falls accounted for the highest number of cases exhibiting none of the defined anatomical predisposing factors. Children are more frequently affected by predisposition-related dislocations than adults. CONCLUSION: The proportion of predispositions is high. A fall, direct impact, or rotational trauma can be viewed as an adequate mechanism of trauma. For successful treatment, it is paramount to analyze the exact mechanism of the trauma and address any underlying predispositions.

Simple traumatic elbow dislocations; benefit from early functional rehabilitation: A systematic review with meta-analysis including PRISMA criteria.

INTRODUCTION: Elbow dislocation is the second most frequent joint dislocation after shoulder dislocation. They have a high relevance because they can result in subsequent damage and limitations in range of motion. The treatment options are controversially discussed.The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review the literature and analyze the evidence of early functional rehabilitation. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed via Ovid Medline, whereby 1645 publications were identified and evaluated in a stepwise approach. Of these publications 29 met the inclusion criteria of the authors and described simple elbow dislocations in 5765 patients.Data from the studies and subgroups included were initially categorized descriptively in conservative and surgical primary therapies, in immobilizing (immobilization lasting 2 weeks or longer) and free-functional follow-up treatments, and those data were then extracted from each subgroup in absolutes. We then pooled these numbers into descriptive statistics to ensure their comparability. We determined the success rates from the numbers of excellent and good results of the specific used outcome scores. RESULTS: The effect estimate of the conservative therapy's success rate was 84% and for surgical treatment 80% (P < .0001). The difference between the immobilizing treatment (78% success rate) and early-function therapy (83% success rate) was significant (P = .002).In a subgroup analysis the success rate of conservative and immobilizing therapy was 79%, of conservative and early-functional therapy 91%, of surgical and immobilizing groups' was 77% and of the surgical and early-functional therapies was 93%. The difference among the 4 treatment options was significant (P < .0001), as were differences between the 2 conservative groups (P < .0001) and between the 2 surgical groups (P = .044). DISCUSSION: Conservative therapy is the dominant therapy. Regardless of the primary therapy chosen in simple elbow dislocations: early functional follow-up care seems to be superior to immobilizing therapy with a duration more than 2 weeks.

[U-shaped fractures of the sacrum-what is the correct treatment? : A presentation of three cases]. / U-Frakturen des Os sacrum ­ Wie therapiert man richtig? : Eine Präsentation dreier Fälle.

BACKGROUND: Sacral U­shaped fractures are rare but severe injuries. Due to the resulting spinopelvic dissociation they are highly unstable. Reduction and stabilization are usually required and decompression may be necessary due to frequent concomitant neurological injuries. In the literature there is no consensus with respect to the selection of the surgical approach. CASE PRESENTATIONS: After a road traffic accident an 18-year-old woman suffered a U-fracture of the sacrum type II according to Roy-Camille and was treated with bilateral double sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis and sacral laminectomy. A 76-year-old man with a U­fracture type I according to Roy-Camille after falling down the stairs was treated by lumbopelvic fixation. A 24-year-old man with U­fracture type II according to Roy Camille after a road accident was treated with triangular vertebropelvic stabilization and sacral laminectomy. For all patients the outcome was good. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment is necessary, with minimally invasive techniques offering advantages over open surgery. A distinction must be made between lumbopelvic fixation and posterior pelvic ring fixation. Multiple aspects must be taken into consideration of the indications when selecting the surgical technique.

The effect of open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomies on the tibial posterior slope-a study of two hundred seventy-nine cases.

PURPOSE: There are two established techniques for high tibial valgisation osteotomy (HTO): medial open wedge (MOW) and lateral closed wedge (LCW). The aim was to analyze the change of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) caused by HTOs dependent on the technique. METHODS: Four hundred fourteen cases of HTOs were analyzed retrospectively. Two hundred seventy-nine osteotomies in 247 patients matched the inclusion criteria and were divided into two treatment groups (MOW/LCW). The PTS was determined on pre- and post-surgical lateral knee X-rays by measuring the proximal posterior tibial angle (PPTA). RESULTS: One hundred ninety of the included 279 cases were assigned to the MOW and 89 to the LCW group. The mean PPTA in MOW HTOs was 79.9° ± 32° (68-88°) and in LCW HTOs 80.6° ± 2.6° (74-88°). There was no statistically significant change of the PPTA in the MOW group comparing the pre- and post-surgical values (delta PPTA 0.07° ±2.9° (- 12 to 11°)). In the LCW group, the surgery resulted in a statistically significant reduction (p< 0.001) of the PTS (delta PPTA - 3.09° ± 4.5° (- 12 to 5°)). CONCLUSION: The important finding of this study is that the thesis of a slope increase in MOW osteotomies found in the literature could not be approved regarding our results as no statistically significant change of PTS in MOW HTOs was observed. The findings support the common thesis that LCW osteotomies cause a slope reduction.