Validity of free testosterone calculation in pregnant women.

Objective Increased maternal testosterone concentration during pregnancy may affect the fetus. Therefore it is clinically relevant to have a quick and reliable method to determine free testosterone levels. Current calculators for free testosterone are suspected to perform poorly during pregnancy due to suggested competition between high levels of estradiol and free (bio-active) testosterone for sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) binding. Therefore, it is claimed that reliable calculation of free testosterone concentration is not possible. However, recent evidence on SHBG-binding sites questions the estradiol effect on the testosterone-SHBG binding during pregnancy. In this study, we investigated whether the free testosterone concentration can be calculated in pregnant women. Design and methods Free testosterone was measured with a specially developed equilibrium dialysis method combined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Free testosterone was also calculated with the formulas of Vermeulen et al. and Ross et al. Results Total and free testosterone measured in healthy men and women were in good agreement with earlier reports. In pregnant women, total testosterone values were higher than in non-pregnant women, whereas free testosterone values were comparable. Calculated free testosterone levels in pregnant women were highly correlated, but marginally higher, compared to measured free testosterone levels. Conclusions We developed an equilibrium dialysis-LC-MS/MS method for the measurement of free testosterone in the low range of pregnant and non-pregnant women. Although during pregnancy total testosterone is increased, this is not the case for free testosterone. The free testosterone formulas perform well in pregnant women.

The influence of oral contraceptives on overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test.

BACKGROUND: In suspected hypercortisolism, the 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test is the usual initial test. In fertile women, false-positive test results are often due to the use of oral contraceptives. By elevating cortisol-binding globulin these contraceptives increase the total serum cortisol concentration. The aim of this study was to assess the duration and degree of influence of oral contraceptives on the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test. METHODS: Thirteen healthy female volunteers without symptoms or signs of overt hypercortisolism, aged 18-55 years, who were using oral contraceptives, underwent a 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test. Tests were repeated one and six weeks after withdrawal of the contraceptive. In addition, 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion and late-night salivary cortisol were measured. RESULTS: Of the 13 volunteers (62%) eight had inadequate suppression of cortisol by 1 mg dexamethasone while using oral contraceptives. One week after the contraceptive was withdrawn, the number of false-positive results significantly decreased to 1 (8%, p < 0.02). Six weeks after discontinuation, all tests were normal. None of the 24-hour urinary cortisol samples and just one late-night salivary cortisol level was elevated. CONCLUSION: The results of the 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test performed one week after cessation of oral contraceptives are accurate in almost all subjects. In case of inadequate suppression, a second test may be performed after six weeks. In this manner the 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test can reliably be done at the end of a seven-day break from contraceptive use in nearly all cases.

The interaction of ibuprofen and diclofenac with aspirin in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aspirin reduces the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke by inhibiting thromboxane production in platelets. This inhibition can be competitively antagonized by some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: By measuring thromboxane B(2) production in healthy volunteers, we investigated whether ibuprofen (800 mg three times daily for 7 days) or diclofenac (50 mg three times daily for 7 days) taken concurrently with aspirin 80 mg (once daily for 7 days) influenced the inhibitory effect of aspirin. The effects were compared with aspirin 30 mg (once daily for 7 days), which is the lowest dose of aspirin with a proven thromboprophylactic effect. KEY RESULTS: The median percentage inhibition of thromboxane B(2) levels by 30 mg or 80 mg aspirin was 90.3% (range 83.1-96.0%) and 98.0% (range 96.8-99.2%) respectively. The inhibition by concurrent administration of slow release diclofenac and 80 mg aspirin was 98.1% (range 97.2-98.9%), indicating no interference between aspirin and diclofenac. The inhibition decreased significantly by concurrent administration of immediate release ibuprofen and 80 mg aspirin (86.6%; range 77.6-95.1%) to a level less than 30 mg aspirin. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: As alternatives are easily available, NSAIDs such as diclofenac should be preferred to ibuprofen for combined use with aspirin.

AT(2) receptor-mediated vasodilation in the heart: effect of myocardial infarction.

To investigate the functional consequences of postinfarct cardiac angiotensin (ANG) type 2 (AT(2)) receptor upregulation, rats underwent coronary artery ligation or sham operation and were infused with ANG II 3-4 wk later, when scar formation is complete. ANG II increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) more modestly in infarcted animals than in sham animals. The AT(1) receptor antagonist irbesartan, but not the AT(2) receptor antagonist PD123319, decreased MAP and antagonized the ANG II-mediated systemic hemodynamic effects. Myocardial (MVC) but not renal vascular conductance (RVC) was diminished in infarcted versus sham rats. ANG II did not affect MVC and reduced RVC in all rats. MVC was unaffected by irbesartan and PD123319 in all animals. However, with PD123319, ANG II reduced MVC in sham but not infarcted animals, and, with irbesartan, ANG II increased MVC in infarcted but not sham animals. Irbesartan increased RVC and antagonized the ANG II-mediated renal effects in all animals. RVC, at baseline or with ANG II, was not affected by PD123319 in infarcted and sham animals. In conclusion, coronary but not renal AT(2) receptor stimulation results in vasodilation, and this effect is enhanced in infarcted rats.

Prostanoids, but not nitric oxide, counterregulate angiotensin II mediated vasoconstriction in vivo.

To evaluate the modulating effects of nitric oxide and prostanoids during angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction, male Wistar rats (n=25) were infused with increasing doses of angiotensin II following pretreatment with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin, the nitric oxide-synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) plus sodium nitroprusside to restore mean arterial blood pressure, or saline. Hemodynamics were studied with the radioactive microsphere method. Indomethacin did not alter systemic or regional hemodynamics. L-NAME+sodium nitroprusside reduced cardiac output, as well as systemic and renal vascular conductance. Angiotensin II increased mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate, and decreased systemic vascular conductance as well as vascular conductance in gastrointestinal tract, kidney, skeletal muscle, skin, mesentery+pancreas, spleen and adrenal. Indomethacin enhanced the angiotensin II-mediated effects in all vascular beds, whereas L-NAME+sodium nitroprusside enhanced its effect in mesentery+pancreas only. In conclusion, vasodilator prostanoids, but not nitric oxide, counterregulate angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction in vivo.

Angiotensin converting enzyme is the main contributor to angiotensin I-II conversion in the interstitium of the isolated perfused rat heart.

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies in homogenized hearts suggest that chymase rather than angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is responsible for cardiac angiotensin I to angiotensin II conversion. We investigated in intact rat hearts whether (i) enzymes other than ACE contribute to angiotensin I to angiotensin II conversion and (ii) the localization (endothelial/extra-endothelial) of converting enzymes. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a modified version of the rat Langendorff heart, allowing separate collection of coronary effluent and interstitial fluid. Hearts were perfused with angiotensin I (arterial concentration 5-10 pmol/ml) under control conditions, in the presence of captopril (1 micromol/l) or after endothelium removal with 0.2% triton X-100. Endothelium removal was verified as the absence of a coronary vasodilator response to 10 nmol bradykinin. Angiotensin I and angiotensin II were measured in coronary effluent and interstitial fluid with sensitive radioimmunoassays. RESULTS: In control hearts, 45% of arterial angiotensin I was metabolized during coronary passage, partly through conversion to angiotensin II. At steady-state, the angiotensin I concentration in interstitial fluid was three to four-fold lower than in coronary effluent, while the angiotensin II concentrations in both fluids were similar. Captopril and endothelium removal did not affect coronary angiotensin I extraction, but increased the interstitial fluid levels of angiotensin I two- and three-fold, respectively, thereby demonstrating that metabolism (by ACE) as well as the physical presence of the endothelium normally prevent arterial angiotensin I from reaching similar levels in coronary effluent and interstitial fluid. Captopril, but not endothelium removal, greatly reduced the angiotensin II levels in coronary effluent and interstitial fluid. With the ACE inhibitor, the angiotensin II/I ratios in coronary effluent and interstitial fluid were 83 and 93% lower, while after endothelium removal, the ratios were 33 and 71% lower. CONCLUSIONS: In the intact rat heart, ACE is the main contributor to angiotensin I to angiotensin II conversion, both in the coronary vascular bed and the interstitium. Cardiac ACE is not limited to the coronary vascular endothelium.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade prevent cardiac remodeling in pigs after myocardial infarction: role of tissue angiotensin II.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms behind the beneficial effects of renin-angiotensin system blockade after myocardial infarction (MI) are not fully elucidated but may include interference with tissue angiotensin II (Ang II). METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-nine pigs underwent coronary artery ligation or sham operation and were studied up to 6 weeks. To determine coronary angiotensin I (Ang I) to Ang II conversion and to distinguish plasma-derived Ang II from locally synthesized Ang II, (125)I-labeled and endogenous Ang I and II were measured in plasma and in infarcted and noninfarcted left ventricle (LV) during (125)I-Ang I infusion. Ang II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor-mediated uptake of circulating (125)I-Ang II was increased at 1 and 3 weeks in noninfarcted LV, and this uptake was the main cause of the transient elevation in Ang II levels in the noninfarcted LV at 1 week. Ang II levels and AT(1) receptor-mediated uptake of circulating Ang II were reduced in the infarct area at all time points. Coronary Ang I to Ang II conversion was unaffected by MI. Captopril and the AT(1) receptor antagonist eprosartan attenuated postinfarct remodeling, although both drugs increased cardiac Ang II production. Captopril blocked coronary conversion by >80% and normalized Ang II uptake in the noninfarcted LV. Eprosartan did not affect coronary conversion and blocked cardiac Ang II uptake by >90%. CONCLUSIONS: Both circulating and locally generated Ang II contribute to remodeling after MI. The rise in tissue Ang II production during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and AT(1) receptor blockade suggests that the antihypertrophic effects of these drugs result not only from diminished AT(1) receptor stimulation but also from increased stimulation of growth-inhibitory Ang II type 2 receptors.

Is there a local renin-angiotensin system in the heart?

The existence of a local renin-angiotensin system in the heart is still a controversial issue. This review discusses the evidence, obtained from studies in cardiac cells, in isolated perfused hearts and in intact animals and humans, both under normal and pathological conditions, for local production of prorenin, renin, angiotensinogen, angiotensin-converting enzyme, angiotensin I and angiotensin II at cardiac tissue sites. In addition, the role of alternative angiotensin-generating enzymes (cathepsin, chymase) and the possibility of (pro)renin uptake from the circulation is evaluated.

No vasoactive role of the angiotensin II type 2 receptor in normotensive Wistar rats.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the vasoactive consequences of angiotensin II type 2 receptor stimulation in vivo. DESIGN AND METHODS: Three consecutive 10 min intravenous infusions of angiotensin (Ang) II (100, 300 and 1000 ng/kg per min) were given to 20 pentobarbitone-anaesthetized normotensive Wistar rats (weight 330+/-6 g, mean +/- SEM). The rats had been pretreated with saline (n = 8), the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, irbesartan (100 microg/kg per min for 30 min, n = 6), or the angiotensin II type 2 receptor antagonist, PD123319 (20 microg/kg per min for 30 min followed by continuous infusion throughout the entire experiment, n = 6). Regional haemodynamic effects of Ang II were studied using the radioactive microsphere method. RESULTS: Ang II increased mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate by, maximally, 44+/-9 and 26+/-6%, respectively (P < 0.05 compared with baseline), and decreased cardiac output and systemic vascular conductance (cardiac output/MAP) by, maximally, 24+/-8 and 47+/-4%, respectively (P < 0.05 compared with baseline). The Ang II-induced decrease in systemic vascular conductance was caused by decreases in vascular conductances (regional flow/MAP) of the gastrointestinal tract (52+/-4%), kidney (63+/-3%), skeletal muscle (39+/-8%), skin (63+/-4%), mesentery + pancreas (32+/-11%), adrenal (27+/-11%) and spleen (57+/-6%) (all P < 0.05 compared with baseline). Irbesartan increased baseline vascular conductances in adrenal, brain and kidney, and inhibited all haemodynamic responses induced by Ang II. PD123319 affected neither baseline values nor the Ang II-induced haemodynamic responses. CONCLUSIONS: Ang II-induced systemic and regional haemodynamic effects in normotensive Wistar rats are mediated exclusively via angiotensin II type 1 receptors. No evidence for angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated vasoactive responses was obtained.

Cardiac interstitial fluid levels of angiotensin I and II in the pig.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether cardiac interstitial fluid levels of angiotensin I and II (Ang I and II) can be monitored in vivo, using the microdialysis technique, and to assess the contribution of plasma-derived angiotensins to the interstitial fluid levels of these peptides. DESIGN AND METHODS: Microdialysis probes were placed in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium of eight anaesthetized pigs, three of which were untreated and five treated with the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist L-158,809 (10 mg intracoronary). All pigs were given a 1 h intracoronary infusion of 125I-Ang II. Aortic and coronary venous blood samples were taken under steady-state conditions, and interstitial dialysate was collected during the entire infusion period. Immediately after stopping the infusion, LV tissue pieces were obtained at various time points. RESULTS: L-158,809 did not affect the levels of endogenous Ang I and II or the levels of plasma 125I-Ang II. Aortic Ang I and II levels (22 and 16 fmol/ml; geometric mean of eight pigs) were comparable to coronary venous Ang I and II levels, whereas the coronary venous 125I-Ang II levels (6650 c.p.m./ml) were approximately 30 times higher than those in the aorta. Tissue Ang I and II levels were 5 and 17 fmol/g, respectively. In untreated animals, the 125I-Ang II levels per g LV tissue were similar to the levels per ml coronary venous plasma, and the ex vivo half-life of tissue 1251-Ang II was > 30 min. In treated animals, tissue 125I-Ang II was < 5% of coronary venous 125I-Ang II and became undetectable within 15 min. 125I-Ang II, Ang I and Ang II levels in the interstitial fluid were close to or below the detection limit (200 c.p.m., 60 fmol and 20 fmol per ml, respectively) in all animals. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma and myocardial interstitial fluid angiotensin levels are of the same order of magnitude. Plasma Ang II does not contribute to the interstitial fluid level of Ang II, most likely because of its rapid metabolism in the vascular wall. Binding to AT1 receptors protects Ang II against metabolism.