Decreasing Decision-to-Incision Times for Unscheduled, Urgent Cesarean Deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: To standardize the preprocedure process for urgent, unscheduled cesarean deliveries to decrease the time from decision to skin incision to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. METHODS: In our quality-improvement project, we selected indications that require urgent cesarean deliveries, created a standard algorithm, then implemented a multidisciplinary process intended to reduce decision-to-incision time. This initiative was conducted from May 2019 to May 2021, with a preimplementation period from May 2019 to November 2019 (n=199), implementation period from December 2019 to September 2020 (n=283), and postimplementation period from October 2020 to May 2021 (n=160). An interrupted time series calculation was performed, with stratification by patient race and ethnicity. The primary process measure was mean decision-to-incision time. The secondary outcomes were neonatal status as measured by 5-minute Apgar score and quantitative blood loss during the cesarean delivery. RESULTS: We analyzed 642 urgent cesarean deliveries; 199 were preimplementation of the standard algorithm, and 160 were postimplementation. The mean decision-to-incision time improved from 88 minutes (95% CI 75-101 min) to 50 minutes (95% CI 47-53 min) from the preimplementation period to the postimplementation period. When stratified by race and ethnicity, the mean decision-to-incision time among Black non-Hispanic patients improved from 98 minutes (95% CI 73-123 min) to 50 minutes (95% CI 45-55 min) (t=3.27, P <.01); it improved from 84 minutes (95% CI 66-103 min) to 49 minutes (95% CI 44-55 min) among Hispanic patients (t=3.51, P <.001). There was no significant improvement in decision-to-incision time among patients in other racial and ethnic groups. When the cesarean delivery was performed for fetal indications, Apgar scores were significantly higher in the postimplementation period compared with the preimplementation period (8.5 vs 8.8 beta=0.29, P <.01). CONCLUSION: Development and implementation of a standard algorithm to expedite decision-to-incision time for unscheduled, urgent cesarean deliveries led to a significant decrease in decision-to-incision time.

Use of an Online Game to Evaluate Health Professions Students' Attitudes toward People in Poverty.

Objective. To determine baseline attitudes of pharmacy, physician assistant studies, and communication science and disorders students toward people in poverty and to examine the effectiveness of using the online poverty simulation game SPENT to affect these attitudes. Methods. Students completed pre/postassessments using the validated Undergraduate Perceptions of Poverty Tracking Survey (UPPTS). Students played the online, open access, SPENT game alone and/or in pairs in a 50-minute class. Results. Significant improvements in scale scores were seen in students after playing SPENT. Quartile results by prescore indicated that students with the lowest attitudes towards patients in poverty improved the most. Results suggested that most students found the experience worthwhile for themselves and/or for their classmates. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest SPENT may improve perspectives of undergraduate pharmacy and other health professions students.

Why the history and physical examination still matter.

The history and physical examination (H/PE) have been the foundation of medical diagnosis for centuries. However, as laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging has expanded, physical examination skills have been deemphasized in medical education, and clinicians have become more reliant on tests and imaging. This article describes the historical contributions of the H/PE and its resurgence in a refined form to improve diagnosis.