The added value of chest imaging after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk wall: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There is no clear evidence regarding the benefit of restaging for distant metastases after neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RTX) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall. This study aimed to determine how often restaging of the chest identified metastatic disease that altered management in these patients. METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective study from 2010 to 2020. All patients with non-metastatic STS of the extremities and trunk wall who were treated with neoadjuvant RTX and received a staging and restaging chest CT scan or X-ray for distant metastasis were included. The outcome of interest was change in treatment strategy due to restaging after neoadjuvant RTX. RESULTS: Within the 144 patients who were staged and treated with neoadjuvant RTX, a restaging chest CT or X-ray was performed in 134 patients (93%). A change in treatment strategy due to new findings at restaging after RTX was observed in 26 out of 134 patients (19%). In 24 patients the scheduled resection of the primary STS was cancelled at restaging (24/134, 18%), given the findings at restaging. The other two patients did receive the intended local resection, but either with palliative intent, or as a part of a previously unplanned multimodality treatment. CONCLUSION: In approximately one in five patients restaging results in a change in treatment strategy. This underlines the added value of routine restaging for distant metastases with chest CT or X-ray after neoadjuvant RTX in patients with STS.

Acute malignant obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: The role of palliative surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who do not have curative treatment options often develop acute obstructive symptoms and when conservative management fails, surgical treatment is the remaining option. However, palliative surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality and the chance of success is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of palliative surgery and to provide guidance for surgeons, medical oncologists and patients in their decision-making. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent palliative surgery for acute obstruction caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis between January 2005 and October 2017 where identified. RESULTS: In total 148 patients underwent surgery. Primary malignancy was colorectal cancer (28.4%), neuroendocrine tumor (20.3%), ovarian cancer (14.2%) or 'other' (37.2%). Median length of postoperative hospital stay was 16 days (IQR 9-24). More than half (58.1%) of the patients developed postoperative complications, 29.1% developed ≥2 complications. In-hospital mortality was 8.8%. Readmission (56.1%) and re-obstruction (35.0%) were common. Median overall survival was 119 days (IQR 48-420). Patients with a neuroendocrine tumor had a significantly better overall survival compared to other primary malignancies (p < 0.001). Patients who developed an obstruction during or within 6 months after treatment with chemotherapy had a worse overall survival (p < 0.001), compared to patients treated with chemotherapy longer than 6 months ago, or patients not treated with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Palliative surgery is associated with high rates of complications and readmission and re-obstruction are common. Comfort care is often a better option than surgery, especially in patients with disease progression under recent treatment with chemotherapy.