Non-canonical STAT3 function reduces REDD1 transcription.

The transcription factor STAT3 is a potent activator of transcription, but evidence exists that STAT3 can also repress gene expression. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms involved in STAT3-dependent gene repression. Notably, STAT3 reduces the expression of the stress-induced mTOR inhibitor REDD1 by reducing REDD1 mRNA transcription. Here, we determined the functional domains of STAT3 responsible for the reduction of REDD1 mRNA and protein expression. Within STAT3, the N-terminal domain and tyrosine 705 are crucial for STAT3-dependent reduction of REDD1 expression. Interestingly, binding of STAT3 to canonical STAT-binding sides within the REDD1 promoter is not necessary for STAT3-mediated reduction of REDD1 expression. Still, STAT3 is recruited to the REDD1 promoter upon stimulation with IL-6, and reduces REDD1 promoter activity. The reduction of REDD1 expression is specific for STAT3, as neither expression nor activation of STAT1 reduces REDD1 mRNA and protein expression. In summary, we present a novel, non-canonical STAT3-dependent mechanism for reducing gene expression. This transcriptional repression increases the functions of STAT3 proteins beyond classical transcriptional activation of cytokine-regulated target genes to a more complex function in modulating gene expression in immunity and cellular stress.

Oxidant stress impairs in vivo reendothelialization capacity of endothelial progenitor cells from patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: restoration by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist rosiglitazone.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are thought to contribute to endothelial recovery after arterial injury. We therefore compared in vivo reendothelialization capacity of EPCs derived from patients with diabetes mellitus and healthy subjects. Moreover, we examined the effect of treatment with the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist rosiglitazone on oxidant stress, nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, and the in vivo reendothelialization capacity of EPCs from diabetic individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: In vivo reendothelialization capacity of EPCs from diabetic patients (n=30) and healthy subjects (n=10) was examined in a nude mouse carotid injury model. Superoxide and NO production of EPCs was determined by electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Thirty patients with diabetes mellitus were randomized to 2 weeks of rosiglitazone (4 mg BID p.o.) or placebo treatment. In vivo reendothelialization capacity of EPCs derived from diabetic subjects was severely reduced compared with EPCs from healthy subjects (reendothelialized area: 8+/-3% versus 37+/-10%; P<0.001). EPCs from diabetic individuals had a substantially increased superoxide production and impaired NO bioavailability. Small-interfering RNA silencing of NAD(P)H oxidase subunit p47(phox) reduced superoxide production and restored NO bioavailability and in vivo reendothelialization capacity of EPCs from diabetic patients. Importantly, rosiglitazone therapy normalized NAD(P)H oxidase activity, restored NO bioavailability, and improved in vivo reendothelialization capacity of EPCs from diabetic patients (reendothelialized area: placebo versus rosiglitazone, 8+/-1% versus 38+/-5%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In vivo reendothelialization capacity of EPCs derived from individuals with diabetes mellitus is severely impaired at least partially as a result of increased NAD(P)H oxidase-dependent superoxide production and subsequently reduced NO bioavailability. Rosiglitazone therapy reduces NAD(P)H oxidase activity and improves reendothelialization capacity of EPCs from diabetic individuals, representing a potential novel mechanism whereby peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonism promotes vascular repair.

Simvastatin versus ezetimibe: pleiotropic and lipid-lowering effects on endothelial function in humans.

BACKGROUND: Statins may exert important pleiotropic effects, ie, improve endothelial function, independently of their impact on LDL cholesterol. In humans, however, pleiotropic effects of statins have never been unequivocally demonstrated because prolonged statin treatment always results in reduced LDL cholesterol levels. We therefore tested the hypothesis that similar reductions in LDL cholesterol with simvastatin and ezetimibe, a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor, result in different effects on endothelial function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients with chronic heart failure were randomized to 4 weeks of simvastatin (10 mg/d) or ezetimibe (10 mg/d) treatment. Flow-dependent dilation (FDD) of the radial artery was determined by high-resolution ultrasound before and after intra-arterial vitamin C to determine the portion of FDD inhibited by radicals (DeltaFDD-VC). Activity of extracellular superoxide dismutase, a major vascular antioxidant enzyme system, was determined after release from the endothelium by a heparin bolus injection. Endothelial progenitor cells were analyzed with an in vitro assay. Simvastatin and ezetimibe treatment reduced LDL cholesterol to a similar extent (15.6% versus 15.4%; P=NS), whereas changes in mevalonate, the product of HMG-CoA-reductase, differed between groups (Deltamevalonate-simvastatin, -1.04+/-0.62 versus Deltamevalonate-ezetimibe, 1.79+/-0.94 ng/mL; P<0.05 between groups). Importantly, FDD was markedly improved after simvastatin (10.5+/-0.6% versus 5.1+/-0.7%; P<0.01) but not after ezetimibe treatment (5.6+/-0.5% versus 5.8+/-0.6%; P=NS). DeltaFDD-VC was substantially reduced after simvastatin but not after ezetimibe treatment. Extracellular superoxide dismutase activity was increased by >100% (P<0.05) after simvastatin but not ezetimibe treatment. Simvastatin treatment increased the number of functionally active endothelial progenitor cells, whereas ezetimibe had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Four weeks of simvastatin treatment improves endothelial function independently of LDL cholesterol lowering, at least in part by reducing oxidant stress. Simvastatin may thereby exert important pleiotropic effects in humans.