Optimization, Characterization, and Comparison of Two Luciferase-Expressing Mouse Glioblastoma Models.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive brain cancer. To model GBM in research, orthotopic brain tumor models, including syngeneic models like GL261 and genetically engineered mouse models like TRP, are used. In longitudinal studies, tumor growth and the treatment response are typically tracked with in vivo imaging, including bioluminescence imaging (BLI), which is quick, cost-effective, and easily quantifiable. However, BLI requires luciferase-tagged cells, and recent studies indicate that the luciferase gene can elicit an immune response, leading to tumor rejection and experimental variation. We sought to optimize the engraftment of two luciferase-expressing GBM models, GL261 Red-FLuc and TRP-mCherry-FLuc, showing differences in tumor take, with GL261 Red-FLuc cells requiring immunocompromised mice for 100% engraftment. Immunohistochemistry and MRI revealed distinct tumor characteristics: GL261 Red-FLuc tumors were well-demarcated with densely packed cells, high mitotic activity, and vascularization. In contrast, TRP-mCherry-FLuc tumors were large, invasive, and necrotic, with perivascular invasion. Quantifying the tumor volume using the HALO® AI analysis platform yielded results comparable to manual measurements, providing a standardized and efficient approach for the reliable, high-throughput analysis of luciferase-expressing tumors. Our study highlights the importance of considering tumor engraftment when using luciferase-expressing GBM models, providing insights for preclinical research design.

Assumptions Underlying Hepatic Clearance Models: Recognizing the Influence of Saturable Protein Binding on Driving Force Concentration and Discrimination Between Models of Hepatic Clearance.

One underlying assumption of hepatic clearance models is often underappreciated. Namely, plasma protein binding is assumed to be nonsaturable within a given drug concentration range, dependent only on protein concentration and equilibrium dissociation constant. However, in vitro hepatic clearance experiments often use low albumin concentrations that may be prone to saturation effects, especially for high-clearance compounds, where the drug concentration changes rapidly. Diazepam isolated perfused rat liver literature datasets collected at varying concentrations of albumin were used to evaluate the predictive utility of four hepatic clearance models (the well-stirred, parallel tube, dispersion, and modified well-stirred model) while both ignoring and accounting for potential impact of saturable protein binding on hepatic clearance model discrimination. In agreement with previous literature findings, analyses without accounting for saturable binding showed poor clearance prediction using all four hepatic clearance models. Here we show that accounting for saturable albumin binding improves clearance predictions across the four hepatic clearance models. Additionally, the well-stirred model best reconciles the difference between the predicted and observed clearance data, suggesting that the well-stirred model is an appropriate model to describe diazepam hepatic clearance when considering appropriate binding models. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Hepatic clearance models are vital for understanding clearance. Caveats in model discrimination and plasma protein binding have sparked an ongoing scientific discussion. This study expands the understanding of the underappreciated potential for saturable plasma protein binding. Fraction unbound must correspond to relevant driving force concentration. These considerations can improve clearance predictions and address hepatic clearance model disconnects. Importantly, even though hepatic clearance models are simple approximations of complex physiological processes, they are valuable tools for clinical clearance predictions.