Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging in simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging for whole-body staging of women with pelvic malignancies.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic benefit of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in an (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging protocol for whole-body staging of women with primary or recurrent malignancies of the pelvis. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with a primary pelvic malignancy or suspected recurrence of a pelvic malignancy were included in our study. All patients underwent a whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging examination that included DWI. Two radiologists separately evaluated the PET/MR imaging datasets without DWI followed by a second interpretation with DWI. First, both readers identified all primary tumors, as well as lymph node and distant metastases. In a second session, PET and DWI data were assessed qualitatively. Image interpretation comprised lesion conspicuity defined as visual lesion-to-background contrast (4-point ordinal scale) and diagnostic confidence (3-point ordinal scale) for all tumors. The results from histopathologic examination and cross-sectional imaging follow-up (≥6 mo) were used as the reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the significance of differences between obtained values. RESULTS: Among the 122 suspected lesions seen, 98 (80.3%) were considered malignant. PET/MR imaging without DWI had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of 92.9%, 87.5%, 96.8%, 75.0%, and 91.8%, respectively, for the detection of malignant lesions. PET/MR imaging with DWI had slightly higher values (94.9%, 83.3%, 95.9%, 80.0%, and 92.6%, respectively), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). In the qualitative assessment of lesion-to-background contrast, PET had significantly (P < 0.05) higher values (3.79 ± 0.58) than DWI (3.63 ± 0.77). Furthermore, significantly (P < 0.05) higher scores were found for diagnostic confidence using PET (2.68 ± 0.64) for the determination of malignant lesions, when compared with DWI (2.53 ± 0.69). CONCLUSION: DWI in PET/MR imaging has no diagnostic benefit for whole-body staging of women with pelvic malignancies. The omission of DWI for staging or restaging gynecologic cancer may significantly reduce examination times, thus increasing patient comfort without a relevant decrease in diagnostic competence.

Simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies of the pelvis: a comparison to whole-body magnetic resonance imaging alone.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) for whole-body staging of patients with recurrent gynecological pelvic malignancies, in comparison to whole-body MRI alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the local institutional ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained before each examination. Thirty-four consecutive patients with a suspected recurrence of cervical (n = 18) or ovarian (n = 16) cancer were prospectively enrolled for an integrated PET/MRI examination, which comprised a diagnostic, contrast-enhanced whole-body MRI protocol including dedicated sagittal dynamic imaging of the pelvis. Two radiologists separately evaluated the data sets regarding lesion count, lesion detection, lesion characterization, and diagnostic confidence. Mean and median values were calculated for each rating. Statistical analyses were performed both per-patient and per-lesion bases using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test to indicate potential significant differences among PET/MRI and MRI (alone) data sets. RESULTS: Malignant lesions were present in 25 of the 34 patients. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging offered correct and superior identification of all 25 patients with cancer recurrence, compared with MRI alone (23/25). A total of 118 lesions (malignant, 89; benign, 29) were detected. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging correctly identified 88 (98.9%) of 89 malignant lesions, whereas MRI alone allowed for correct identification of 79 (88.8%) of the 89 malignant lesions. In addition, PET/MRI provided significantly higher lesion contrast and diagnostic confidence in the detection of malignant lesions (P < 0.001) compared with MRI alone. CONCLUSIONS: These first results demonstrate the high diagnostic potential of integrated PET/MRI for the assessment of recurrence of female pelvic malignancies compared with MRI alone.