Analysis of the amplified p-wave enables identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm.

Aim: This study sought to develop and validate diagnostic models to identify individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) using amplified sinus-p-wave analysis. Methods: A total of 1,492 patients (491 healthy controls, 499 with paroxysmal AF and 502 with persistent AF) underwent digital 12-lead-ECG recording during sinus rhythm. The patient cohort was divided into training and validation set in a 3:2 ratio. P-wave indices (PWI) including duration of standard p-wave (standard PWD; scale at 10 mm/mV, sweep speed at 25 mm/s) and amplified sinus-p-wave (APWD, scale at 60-120 mm/mV, sweep speed at 100 mm/s) and advanced inter-atrial block (aIAB) along with other clinical parameters were used to develop diagnostic models using logistic regression. Each model was developed from the training set and further tested in both training and validation sets for its diagnostic performance in identifying individuals with AF. Results: Compared to standard PWD (Reference model), which achieved an AUC of 0.637 and 0.632, for training and validation set, respectively, APWD (Basic model) importantly improved the accuracy to identify individuals with AF (AUC = 0.86 and 0.866). The PWI-based model combining APWD, aIAB and body surface area (BSA) further improved the diagnostic performance for AF (AUC = 0.892 and 0.885). The integrated model, which further combined left atrial diameter (LAD) with parameters of the PWI-based model, achieved optimal diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.916 and 0.902). Conclusion: Analysis of amplified p-wave during sinus rhythm allows identification of individuals with atrial fibrillation.

Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) is an important cause of AF recurrence after ablation. With the advent of force sensing catheters, catheter-tissue contact can be determined quantitatively. Since contact force (CF) plays a major role in determining the characteristics of RF lesion, we prospectively assessed the mechanisms of PVR with regard to catheter-contact and lesion distances in patients undergoing AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty symptomatic AF patients underwent wide circumferential PV isolation (PVI) with SmartTouch™ CF catheter. The exact locations of acute PVI and spontaneous or adenosine-provoked PVR were annotated on CARTO. One thousand nine hundred and twenty-six RF lesions isolated 153 PVs. PVR occurred in 35 (23%) PVs: 22 (63%) adenosine-provoked and 13 (37%) spontaneous. CF was significantly lower at PVR versus PVI sites for RF lesions within 6 mm from these sites: mean CF 5 versus 11 g (P < 0.0001) and force-time integral (FTI) 225 versus 415 gs (P < 0.0001); 86% of PVR occurred with a mean CF < 10 g (FTI < 400 gs); and the remaining 14% occurred at ablation sites with a long interlesion distance (≥5 mm) despite mean CF ≥ 10 g. Eighty percent of PVR sites were located anteriorly. There were no significant differences in regard to arrhythmia freedom between the patients without (69%) versus with PVR (67%; P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Acutely durable PVI can be achieved when RF lesions are delivered with a mean CF ≥ 10 g and an interlesion distance <5 mm. The majority of PVR occur anteriorly due to inadequate CF or long interlesion distances.

Enhanced efficiency of a novel porous tip irrigated RF ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation.

INTRODUCTION: Irrigated tip radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is the most frequently used technology for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency and the safety of 2 different open irrigated tip RF ablation catheters. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 160 patients with symptomatic AF (29% persistent, 68% male, 61 ± 10 years) were randomized to circumferential PVI using 2 different irrigated tip catheters: (1) the novel Thermocool SF(®) with a porous tip (56 holes) or (2) the Thermocool(®) catheter with 6 irrigation holes at the distal tip in both power- and temperature-controlled modes. PVI procedural time and RF duration were significantly shorter with SF(®) versus Thermocool(®) catheter: 104.5 versus 114 minutes (P = 0.023) and 35.4 minutes versus 39.9 minutes (P < 0.001), respectively. Similarly, the total fluoroscopy time and dose were shorter with SF(®) versus. Thermocool(®) catheter: 21 minutes versus 24 minutes (P = 0.02) and 1014.5 µGy*m(2) versus 1377 µGy*m(2) (P < 0.0001), respectively. Irrigation volume was lower with SF(®): 600 mL versus 1100 mL, (P < 0.0001) and the rates of complications were not significantly different (0.6% vs 0.49%, P = 0.66). At 20.5 ± 7.5 months follow-up, there were no significant differences with regard to arrhythmia freedom between SF(®) (59.2%) and TC® groups (59.3%), (P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Using the novel irrigated tip SF catheter, PVI is achieved within a shorter ablation and procedural durations. The underlying mechanisms and potential differences in RF lesion size remain to be elucidated.