Viral encephalitis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a rare complication with distinct characteristics of different causative agents.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on characteristics of viral encephalitis in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed 2,628 patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation to identify risk factors and characteristics of viral encephalitis. RESULTS: Viral encephalitis occurred in 32 patients (1.2%, 95% confidence interval 0.8%-1.6%) and was associated with the use of OKT-3 or alemtuzumab for T-cell depletion (P < 0.001) and an increased mortality (P = 0.011) in comparison to patients without viral encephalitis. Detected viruses included human herpesvirus-6 (28%), Epstein-Barr virus (19%), herpes simplex virus (13%), JC virus (9%), varicella zoster virus (6%), cytomegalovirus (6%) and adenovirus (3%). More than one virus was identified in 16% of the patients. The median onset time was 106 days after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for the total group of 32 patients, but onset times were shortest in those with human herpesvirus-6 encephalitis and longest in those with JC virus-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. The probability of a sustained response to treatment was 63% (95% confidence interval 44%-82%) with a median survival of 94 (95% confidence interval 36-152) days after onset, but significant variation was found when considering different causative viruses. Patients with herpes simplex virus encephalitis had the most favorable outcome with no encephalitis-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The use of OKT-3 or alemtuzumab for in vivo T-cell depletion is associated with an increased risk of viral encephalitis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Different viruses are frequently associated with distinct characteristics such as onset time, response to treatment and outcome.

Utility of procalcitonin concentration in the evaluation of patients with malignant diseases and elevated C-reactive protein plasma concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma concentrations of the C-reactive protein (CRP) are frequently found in patients with malignant diseases. Discrimination between infection and noninfectious acute-phase reactions is essential for therapeutic decisions. METHODS: Because increased procalcitonin (PCT) concentrations have been described predominantly in patients with a systemic infection, PCT plasma concentrations were measured prospectively in 111 patients with a hemato-oncological condition with a CRP concentration >8 mg/L. RESULTS: Documented cases of infection were identified in 42 patients, 39 patients had unexplained fever, and 30 patients had no signs of infection. Twenty patients in the latter group were classified as having an elevated CRP concentration caused by a high tumor load (tumor group), and 8 had elevated concentrations that were drug related (drug group). Median CRP concentrations did not differ significantly between groups of patients with and without infection. PCT concentrations were higher in patients with an infection than in patients without an infection and were within the normal range in all patients in the drug and tumor groups. As shown by receiver operating characteristic analysis, PCT concentration was a significant discriminator between having and not having infection, having infection and being in the tumor group, and having infection and being in the drug group. In contrast, CRP concentration was only a predictor of being in the drug group, when the cut-off point was set at 85.1 mg/L, which limited its clinical applicability. CONCLUSIONS: PCT concentration contributes significantly to the differential diagnosis for elevated CRP concentrations in patients with hemato-oncological conditions and facilitates therapeutic decisions.

Prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors--guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO).

Morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancies, especially leukemia and lymphoma, are increased by invasive fungal infections. Since diagnosis of invasive fungal infection is often delayed, antifungal prophylaxis is an attractive approach for patients expecting prolonged neutropenia. Antifungal prophylaxis has obviously attracted much interest resulting in dozens of clinical trials since the late 1970s. The non-absorbable polyenes are probably ineffective in preventing invasive fungal infections, but may reduce superficial mycoses. Intravenous amphotericin B and the newer azoles were used in clinical trials, but their role in antifungal prophylaxis is still not well defined. Allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients are at particularly high risk for invasive fungal infections. Other well described risk factors are neutropenia >10 days, corticosteroid therapy, sustained immunosuppression, graft versus host disease, and concomitant viral infections. The enormous study efforts are contrasted by a scarcity of risk stratified evidence based recommendations for clinical decision making. The objective of this review accumulating information on about 10.000 patients is to assess evidence based criteria primarily regarding the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients.

Antimicrobial therapy of febrile complications after high-dose chemo-/radiotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation--guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO).

Infectious complications occur in 60-100% of patients following high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and are commonly caused by Gram-negative aerobic bacteria (such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterobacteriacea e) and Gram-positive cocci (such as enterococci, streptococci and staphylococci), which should be covered by empiric first-line antibiotic therapy. Less frequently, infections are caused by fungi and anaerobic bacteria, and initial therapy does not necessarily have to cover coagulase-negative staphylococci, oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), anaerobic bacteria and fungi. Patients who already receive antibiotics and develop pulmonary infiltrates should immediately be treated with systemic antifungals. Patients with fever and diarrhea or other signs and symptoms of gastrointestinal or perianal infection should be treated with antibiotics covering anaerobic bacteria and enterococci. Clinically stable patients with skin infections or central venous catheter-related infections can be treated with standard empiric antibiotic therapy including a beta-lactam active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with or without an aminoglycoside, and should only receive glycopeptides if they do not respond to first-line therapy within 72 hours, become clinically unstable, have severe mucositis, or when resistance against the empiric antibiotics is demonstrated. Recombinant hematopoietic growth factors should not be added routinely but may be considered in life-threatening situations such as invasive pulmonary mycoses or sepsis.