The role of the endovascular surgeon for lower extremity ischemia.

UNLABELLED: Since the data investigating endovascular therapy performed by surgeons is scarce, we retrospectively reviewed our experience of endovascular procedures performed by vascular surgeons in the operating room for lower extremity ischemia due to stenotic lesions. METHODS: A total of 14,424 procedures were performed by our division between January 1990--October 2003. Of these, 500 involved a balloon angioplasty. These made up 3.5% of the total caseload. The median age of the patients who underwent these 500 balloon angioplasty was 72+/-0.5 years old; 65% were male; 50% had a history of diabetes mellitus, and 6% had ESRD. Indications for the procedures included acute ischemia (47 cases), critical ischemia (rest pain, gangrene, or ischemic ulcers in 254 cases), failing bypass (64 cases), severe claudication (134 cases), and preoperative for a popliteal artery aneurysm repair. RESULTS: 244 of the procedures were percutaneous, and the remaining 256 were combined with some type of open procedure. Those performed as an open technique were in combination with a bypass (135 cases) and in combination with a patch angioplasty (31cases). Balloon angioplasties were performed of the aorta (5 cases), iliac arteries (281 cases), the superficial femoral artery (SFA) (101 cases), the popliteal artery (44 cases), the tibial vessels (77 cases), the subclavian/axillary artery (5 cases) and failing grafts (26 cases). Balloon angioplasty was attempted in eight cases and failed due to inability to cross the lesion with a guidewire. Intraoperative complications included 4 dissections, inability to dilate the lesion adequately (2 cases), and rupture of two iliac lesions that underwent open repair (1 case) or repair with a stent graft (1 case). Stents were initially used highly selectively but recently are now being deployed more liberally in the iliac arteries (total 251 cases with stents). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, we suggest that balloon angioplasty is a useful tool that can be performed by vascular surgeons safely. The advantages to the patients include one combined procedure to treat lower extremity ischemia.

Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians : is it worth the effort?

PURPOSE: The safety, effectiveness and cost issues of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the elderly patient have been debated due to the limited life expectancy and presumably increased rate of complications. This is despite multiple reports in the literature of excellent results in this population. To further examine this issue, we compared characteristics of three populations who underwent CEA at our institution: 53-79 year old patients (youngest group), 80-89 years old patients (middle group), and 90-98 year old patients (oldest group). METHODS: Medical and financial data were obtained by retrospective review of hospital charts and billing records. We analyzed 266 random CEAs performed in 251 patients in the youngest group, 280 CEAs performed in 247 patients in the middle group and 19 CEA in 16 patients in the oldest group performed between 2/1/90 and 2/5/01. RESULTS: Comparing each CEA group, there were no differences in gender (males: 56% vs. 51% vs. 53%), incidence of preoperative symptoms (43% vs. 43% vs. 42%), hypertension (68% vs. 60% vs. 42%), combined perioperative death and stroke rate (1.8% vs. 2.1% vs. 10%) or other complications (11% vs. 10% vs. 10%). Significant differences (p<0.05) were noted between the groups in incidence of diabetes (33% vs. 51% vs. 5% in each group), and heart disease (28% vs. 38% vs. 21%). Length of stay for admissions for CEA only were also similar in all three groups (2.37 days vs. 2.67 days vs. 2.36 days). A cost analysis of the earliest 230 patients in the entire series examining hospital cost per case revealed similar data for the < 80 years old and > 80 year old patients ($7,842 vs. $9,400). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid endarterectomy can be performed in the elderly as safely and cost effectively as in the younger population.

Carotid surgery without external carotid endarterectomy: a 6-year clinical experience with 1027 cases.

PURPOSE: previously we routinely performed endarterectomy of the external carotid artery (ECA) during carotid surgery. However, discouraging experience and lack of supportive data in the literature made us question its necessity. The present report describes our experience with a modified carotid endarterectomy (CEA) technique where the ECA is left undisturbed regardless of its degree of stenosis. METHODS: from January 1996 to June 2001, 1027 CEAs were performed in 905 patients with this technique at our institution. All operations were performed for at least 60% internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. A preoperative carotid duplex scan was available for review in 990 cases (96%). Follow-up duplex scans were recovered from 0 to 1 months in 851 cases (83%) and from >1 month in 655 cases (64%). Seventy percent of these cases were performed for asymptomatic lesions. RESULTS: the perioperative (30-day) mortality rate for the entire group of patients was 0.5% and the stroke rate was 0.7%. Mean follow-up was 18 months (range: 2-66 months). Only two ECAs occluded in the first postoperative month. During the follow-up period, 37 additional ECAs (5.6%) were found to progress from mild to severe (>75%) stenosis postoperatively. In addition, 7% of the cases were found to have worsened the degree of stenosis, 8% improved and 85% remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: these data support sparing of the ECA during CEA.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and Duplex Ultrasound Arterial Mapping (DUAM) prior to infrainguinal arterial reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: the purpose of this study is to compare Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) to Duplex Ultrasound Arterial Mapping (DUAM) and intraoperative findings to determine the clinical, accuracy of MRA for planning lower extremity revascularization procedures. METHODS: forty-two patients who underwent lower extremity revascularization procedures had both MRA and DUAM evaluations. These data were analyzed retrospectively and two distinct endpoints were considered. First, we compared the MRA and DUAM findings for aorto-iliac, femoral-popliteal and infra-popliteal segments to intraoperative findings and evaluated the degree to which they agreed. Second, if there was a disagreement between imaging modalities, it was established whether a change in operative procedure would have resulted. RESULTS: MRA and DUAM findings agreed in 26 of 31 cases (83%) of aorto-iliac segments, in 25 of 31 cases (81%) of femoral-popliteal segments, and in 16 of 21 cases (76%) of infra-popliteal segments. In total, DUAM agreed with intraoperative findings in 98% of cases while MRA agreed in 82% (p<.001). Disagreement between intraoperative findings and DUAM lead to an alternate surgical procedure in only one case (2%) while disagreement with MRA lead to a different procedure in 38% of cases (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: these data show that MRA is not yet adequate to replace conventional angiography and is less accurate that DUAM. Further improvements are necessary before MRA can be used as the sole modality for formulation of a pre-operative plan for lower extremity revascularization.

Causes of early post carotid endartectomy stroke in a recent series: the increasing importance of hyperperfusion syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Early stroke occurs in 0.9% to 7% of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). These have been thought to be mostly due to embolization. However, in our recent clinical experience, we noted hyperperfusion syndrome to be a significant cause of postoperative strokes. Therefore, we reviewed our experience and investigated the distribution of causes of early postoperative strokes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 444 consecutive patients who underwent CEA at our institution between June 1997 and October 1999 (500 operations) was performed to evaluate the incidence and etiology of early postoperative strokes. Indications for operation included history of stroke correlating with the side of ICA stenosis (50 patients or 10%), symptoms of transient ischemic attacks (84 patients or 16.8%), amaurosis fugax (18 patients or 3.6%), or asymptomatic stenosis (348 patients or 69.6%). All patients were evaluated with duplex scan preoperatively and postoperatively. Diagnosis of early postoperative strokes within one month after CEA was made based on clinical examination. Postoperative CT scan of the brain was available in 100% of patients with suspected diagnosis of CVA. RESULTS: Five patients (3 male and 2 female) were diagnosed with strokes postoperatively (1%). These five were symptomatic patients with ICA stenosis > or = 80% and moderate contralateral ICA stenosis. In two of those patients (40%), the reason for the stroke was considered embolization to the cerebral arteries; one patient suffered a shunt injury as a cause of stroke; two patients (40%) were diagnosed with hyperperfusion syndrome. In both patients diagnosis was made clinically, and in only one of those patients the clinical picture correlated with CT scan. Two patients (0.4%) had asymptomatic ICA occlusion at 2 weeks and 18 days postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Embolization to the cerebral arteries remains the leading cause of early postoperative strokes. However, hyperperfusion syndrome also accounts for a significant portion of these postoperative strokes. The percentage of patients with this syndrome might be even higher, once clinical picture is clearly defined. These data warrant further investigation of hyperperfusion syndrome.