[The medical dissertation in Germany : A quantitative analysis of promotion regulations in medical faculties]. / Die medizinische Doktorarbeit in Deutschland : Eine quantitative Analyse der Promotionsordnungen medizinischer Fakultäten.

BACKGROUND: The medical dissertation represents an independently processed scientific project. In the field of medicine this has for many years displayed the basis for controversial discussions. The aim of the study presented here was to evaluate the prerequisites of all current promotion regulations in German medical faculties in order to develop a comparability on the basis of a scoring system. METHOD: An independent analysis of all promotion regulations from German medical faculties for the year 2014 was carried out according to 12 primary outcome measures and a scoring system. RESULTS: The average total score of promotion regulations at 37 German medical faculties was 57.2 points (SD ±9.5) out of a possible 100 scoring points. The highest scores with 72-85 points were achieved by 3 faculties and 5 achieved scores of only 42-45 points. The range of the different criteria tested was broad. While the written thesis, the review process, the examination requirements as well as the grading of the thesis were defined in all regulations, the introduction into good clinical practice, knowledge of methodology as well as a check for plagiarism only seem to play minor roles. CONCLUSION: The promotion regulations at German medical faculties show a great variation using the scoring system presented here for the first time. Standardized federal promotion regulations might help to establish a structured transparency as well as a national equality of opportunity.

[Postdoctoral lecturer thesis in medicine: academic competence or career booster?]. / Die medizinische Habilitation: akademische Befähigung oder Karriereinstrument?

BACKGROUND: The postdoctoral lecturer thesis in medicine represents an essential success factor for the career of a physician; however, there is controversial discussion on whether this reflects academic competence or is more a career booster. In this context we conducted a survey among postdoctoral medical lecturers with the aim to evaluate the significance of this qualification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The online survey was performed using a questionnaire requesting biographical parameters and subjective ratings of topics concerning the postdoctoral lecturer thesis. RESULTS: Overall 628 questionnaires were included in the study. The significance of the postdoctoral qualification was rated high in 68.6 % and was seen to be necessary for professional advancement in 71.0 %. The chances of obtaining a full professorship after achieving a postdoctoral qualification were rated moderate to low (68.1 %); nevertheless, 92.3 % would do it again and 86.5 % would recommend it to colleagues. Accordingly, 78.8 % were against its abolishment. Wishes for reforms included standardized federal regulations, reduced dependency on professors and more transparency. CONCLUSION: The postdoctoral lecturer qualification in medicine is highly valued and the majority of responders did not want it to be abolished. Although the chances for a full professorship were only rated low, successful graduation seems to be beneficial for the career; however, there is a need for substantial structural and international changes.

[Determining the quality of long-term care. A comparative analysis of transparency criteria, resident-related indicators, and staff assessment]. / Messung der Pflegequalität in der Langzeitpflege. Eine vergleichende Analyse von Pflegetransparenzkriterien, bewohnerbezogenen Indikatoren und Beurteilungen der Mitarbeiter.

INTRODUCTION: From 2009, the quality of care in nursing homes in Germany is inspected, rated, and publicized. This study investigates the association between staff-perceived nursing quality, clinical quality indicators, and ratings of health insurance medical services based on the transparency of stationary care agreement (PTVS). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study merging publicly reported data, clinical quality indicators of a national health provider system, and data from staff surveys. Data from 83 nursing homes were adjusted for sample size, age, and care level and analyzed using Kendall's tau coefficients and scatter plots. RESULTS: There were pronounced differences in staff-perceived nursing quality and some of the clinical indicators between facilities that were not detected by the PTVS. There was a weak association between staff-perceived quality and care quality rated by external inspections. No associations were found between the PTVS and clinical quality indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between nursing home providers were detected to varying degrees by the three approaches and were if at all weakly associated. Given the aims followed by public reporting initiatives of nursing home providers, the results stress the importance of revising the PTVS.