[General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) in Simple Language: Internal Consistency, Standard Values and Correlations with Demographic Variables in a Representative German Sample]. / Skala Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung in Leichter Sprache (SWE-LS): interne Konsistenz, Normwerte und Zusammenhänge mit demografischen Variablen in einer repräsentativen Stichprobe.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 6,2 million people with limited literacy live in Germany. They are unable to communicate in written language beyond single sentences and thus experience limited social participation in many everyday areas. In addition, they are also excluded from participation in survey-based social science research. METHOD: In order to enable persons with limited literacy to participate in written surveys, existing questionnaires need to be converted to easy language and their psychometric quality needs to be reexamined. We went through this process for the Self-Efficacy Expectancy (SWE) questionnaire and tested the new scale in easy language (SWE-LS) on a representative sample of the German population aged 14 years and older (N=2,531). RESULTS: The SWE-LS scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's-Alpha=0,84) and adequate item difficulty and discriminatory power. We found correlations consistent with expectations for the demographic variables surveyed. Thus, men and persons with higher education and higher income showed significantly higher self-efficacy expectations. The effect was also evident for East Germans versus West Germans, married persons living together versus separated, unmarried, or persons living as singles. DISCUSSION: Compared to the original SWE scale, the SWE-LS scale in easy language has no methodological disadvantages. The additional effort of linguistic adaptation and renewed psychometric testing is thus directly offset by enabling participation in survey-based research by over 12% of the adult population. A systematic translation of particularly frequently used questionnaires or those that do not concern fundamental research but research areas in which demographic variables themselves are part of the research object would be desirable.

[Relationship Between Social Integration, Global Self-Esteem, and Physical and Mental Health in a Representative German Sample]. / Zusammenhang von sozialer Teilhabe, globalem Selbstwert sowie physischer und psychischer Gesundheit in einer repräsentativen deutschen Stichprobe.

INTRODUCTION: Beyond participation as a civil right, social participation has already been considered from legal, ethical, socio-psychological and political perspectives as an important component of the self- and external evaluation of a person as a valuable member of a society. Thus, social psychological studies frequently showed the importance of the sense of belonging as a central psychological component of social participation for both personal and social self-esteem. From a medical-psychological perspective, the association of global self-esteem and self-efficacy with health is well established. However, it is an open question whether social participation is directly related to psychological and physical well-being or whether this relationship is mediated via global self-esteem. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a nationwide representative survey in Germany (N=2.531; age 14-93, M=48.58; 55.4% women), the variables social participation (KsT-5), global self-esteem (SISE), and physical and mental health (EQ5D) were measured using standardized questionnaires to examine a potential mediation. RESULTS: As expected, significant positive correlations between social participation, global self-esteem and physical and mental health were found with medium ranged effect sizes. However, global self-esteem only partially mediated the association between social participation and health, i. e. a direct significant association between social participation and health could be proven. DISCUSSION: The results underline the direct relevance of social participation for physical and mental health. This opens a hitherto hardly used perspective for health promotion in interaction with socio-political challenges in the topics of integration, inclusion and the sense of belonging.

[Short Scale Measuring Perceived Social Participation: Factorial Structure, Internal Consistency, Content Validity, Convergent Validity and Standard Values in a Representative German Sample]. / Kurz-Skala zur Erfassung wahrgenommener sozialer Teilhabe (KsT-5): faktorielle Struktur, interne Konsistenz, inhaltliche und konvergente Validität sowie Normwerte in einer repräsentativen Stichprobe.

Social participation is politically as well as socially and psychologically relevant for the coexistence of people in our society and the well-being of the individual. In light of the German Federal Participation Act and the partial equalization of the terms "(Social) Participation" and "Inclusion", social participation in recent years has frequently been restricted to people with disabilities with regard to the "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)" of the World Health Organization and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The question of participation, however, affects all people and is not only dependent on the degree of functional capacity or disability, but also on social inclusion, financial possibilities, regional affiliation, education, self-esteem and is correlated with health. In the present study, a new short scale of 5 items (KsT-5) for measuring the aspects "belonging", "self-efficacy", "need for recognition", "self-esteem" and "integration in the social environment" was tested on a German representative general population sample (N=2531) with regard to their psychometric quality criteria. It showed a good fit with a one-factor solution, a satisfactory internal consistency of Cronbach's α=0,73 and McDonald's ω=0,73 as well as good convergent validity over positive correlations with self-esteem and psychological as well as physical health. This study provides norm values of the new KsT-5 stratified according to gender and age as a prerequisite for use in future studies.

Self-Esteem as a Potential Mediator of the Association Between Social Integration, Mental Well-Being, and Physical Well-Being.

Previous research points to a significant impact of social integration and self-esteem on well-being. The present study examined whether self-esteem constitutes one pathway from social integration in the classroom to mental and physical well-being of students and accordingly serves as a mediator. Therefore, 163 students (mean age: 12.98 years, age range: 9-17 years, 57.9% male) of three German secondary schools were examined regarding their experience of social integration, self-esteem, and mental as well as physical well-being. Results revealed that self-esteem mediated the effect of social integration on mental and physical well-being. This finding elucidates one pathway from social integration to well-being and points to the importance of improving both self-esteem and social integration for the promotion of well-being among adolescents.

Evaluation of "Healthy Learning. Together", an Easily Applicable Mental Health Promotion Tool for Students Aged 9 to 18 Years.

Schools play an important role in adolescents' health promotion. Due to the limited resources of teachers, there is a need for short-time interventions that can be easily implemented in a regular class without extensive training. Therefore, the tool "Healthy learning. Together." was developed within a joint venture research project in Jena, Germany. The tool consists of a box with 60 exercises and a poster exhibition for students in 5th grade and higher. One thousand one hundred and forty four (1144) students (56 % female) from nine schools were assessed at an interval of 10 weeks in a parallelized pre-post-design with class-wise assignment to intervention group (IG) and control group (CG). In the IG, regular teachers implemented the health promotion tool. Before and after the intervention social integration, class climate, self-efficacy (as primary outcomes) and mental and physical wellbeing (as secondary outcomes) were measured using standardized questionnaires. ANCOVA analysis revealed that students of the IG showed more positive changes on primary outcomes with small effect sizes. Additional implementation outcomes showed high teacher and student enthusiasm but sometimes low exposure rates. Regarding the relatively small amount of time and preparation for teachers to get noticeable effects, the introduced tool is suitable as a first step into health promotion for schools.

[Inclusive Research: Validation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Simple Language in a Sample of Students with Special Educational Needs]. / Inklusive Forschung: Validierung der Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung (SWE) in Leichter Sprache an einer Stichprobe von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 7% of pupils in Germany have special educational needs. This is accompanied by a general reduction in social participation, partly due to a reduction in language comprehension. The endeavour for social inclusion therefore includes the provision of text information in simple language. Since written surveys play an important role in social science and clinical research, this also applies to psychometric questionnaires. OBJECTIVE: Comparison of psychometric quality of the original scale measuring self-efficacy (German version: SWE, English version: GSE) and a version of the same scale translated into simple language (SWE-LS). METHODS: Both versions of the SWE were completed by N=94 pupils aged between 12 and 19 years with special educational needs from 7 special schools in Thuringia. Internal consistency and convergent validity of both scales were measured. RESULTS: Both scale versions achieved satisfactory internal consistency (SWE:=0.74, SWE-LS:=0.78). However, the mean scale values differ significantly. The convergent validity was r=0.69, whereby 3 items did not correlate significantly (-0.010.21). The proportion of missing values is significantly higher for the original SWE with 16% listwise and 6.7% pairwise than for the SWE-LS with 3.2 and 0.5%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Overall, the SWE-LS translated into simple language has a better psychometric quality than the original scale. The lower proportion of missing values also speaks for the use of the SWE-LS. CONCLUSION: The translation of standardised questionnaires into simple language offers the possibility of also including groups of participants who have so far been excluded or who have only been surveyed indirectly (e. g. through caregivers). The cost of translation is comparable to that of translation into other languages. In the case of simple language, however, a back translation and thus a verification of the validity of the content are not possible.

Deviation between self-reported and measured occupational physical activity levels in office employees: effects of age and body composition.

OBJECTIVES: Whether occupational physical activity (PA) will be assessed via questionnaires or accelerometry depends on available resources. Although self-reported data collection seems feasible and inexpensive, obtained information could be biased by demographic determinants. Thus, we aimed at comparing self-reported and objectively measured occupational sitting, standing, and walking times adjusted for socio-demographic variables. METHODS: Thirty-eight office employees (eight males, 30 females, age 40.8 ± 11.4 years, BMI 23.9 ± 4.2 kg/m(2)) supplied with height-adjustable working desks were asked to report sitting, standing, and walking times using the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire during one working week. The ActiGraph wGT3X-BT was used to objectively measure occupational PA during the same week. Subjectively and objectively measured data were compared computing the intra-class correlation coefficients, paired t tests and Bland-Altman plots. Furthermore, repeated-measurement ANOVAs for measurement (subjective vs. objective) and socio-demographic variables were calculated. RESULTS: Self-reported data yielded a significant underestimation of standing time (13.3 vs. 17.9%) and an overestimation of walking time (12.7 vs. 5.0%). Significant interaction effects of age and measurement of standing time (F = 6.0, p = .02, ηp(2) = .14) and BMI group and measurement of walking time were found (F = 3.7, p = .04, ηp(2) = .17). Older employees (>39 years) underestimated their standing time, while underweight workers (BMI < 20 kg/m(2)) overestimated their walking time. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported PA data differ from objective data. Demographic variables (age, BMI) affect the amount of self-reported misjudging of PA. In order to improve the validity of self-reported data, a correction formula for the economic assessment of PA by subjective measures is needed, considering age and BMI.

Resilience is more about being flexible than about staying positive.

Kalisch et al. propose a positive appraisal style as the key mechanism that underlies resilience. The present authors suggest that flexibility in emotion processing is more conducive to resilience than a general positivity bias. People may achieve emotional flexibility through counter-regulation - a dynamic processing bias toward positive stimuli in negative contexts and negative stimuli in positive contexts.

On the dynamics of implicit emotion regulation: counter-regulation after remembering events of high but not of low emotional intensity.

Valence biases in attention allocation were assessed after remembering positive or negative personal events that were either still emotionally hot or to which the person had already adapted psychologically. Differences regarding the current state of psychological adjustment were manipulated experimentally by instructing participants to recall distant vs. recent events (Experiment 1) or affectively hot events vs. events to which the person had accommodated already (Experiment 2). Valence biases in affective processing were measured with a valence search task. Processes of emotional counter-regulation (i.e., attention allocation to stimuli of opposite valence to the emotional event) were elicited by remembering affectively hot events, whereas congruency effects (i.e., attention allocation to stimuli of the same valence as the emotional event) were obtained for events for which a final appraisal had already been established. The results of our study help to resolve conflicting findings from the literature regarding congruent vs. incongruent effects of remembering emotional events on affective processing. We discuss implications of our findings for the conception of emotions and for the dynamics of emotion regulation processes.

Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing.

The present study investigated whether counter-regulation in affective processing is triggered by emotions. Automatic attention allocation to valent stimuli was measured in the context of positive and negative affective states. Valence biases were assessed by comparing the detection of positive versus negative words in a visual search task (Experiment 1) or by comparing interference effects of positive and negative distractor words in an emotional Stroop task (Experiment 2). Imagining a hypothetical emotional situation (Experiment 1) or watching romantic versus depressing movie clips (Experiment 2) increased attention allocation to stimuli that were opposite in valence to the current emotional state. Counter-regulation is assumed to reflect a basic mechanism underlying implicit emotion regulation.