Assessment of two measurement techniques of cervical spine and C1-C2 rotation in the outcome research of axis fractures: a morphometrical analysis using dynamic computed tomography scanning.

STUDY DESIGN: In vivo study on cervical spine motion. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of clinical measurements, using a handheld goniometer for the assessment of total cervical neck rotation in outcome research of patients with C2 fractures and particularly odontoid fractures. Investigation on whether functional computed tomography (CT)-scanning is decisive in the investigation of functional outcome after C2 fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pertinent literature exists concerning indications, techniques, complications of treatment, and risk factors for nonunion in C2 fractures; however, there are scarce data regarding the functional outcome in C2 fractures. Only a few studies assess functional outcome in terms of clinical outcome vehicles and clinical investigation of axial neck rotation, using a handheld goniometer. Measurements of axial neck rotation using a handheld goniometer are assumed not sufficient to compare the results of treatment strategies for C2-fractures or elucidate the ability for posttreatment rotation of C1-C2. METHODS: The authors selected a homogenous group of 35 patients treated for C2 fractures using nonsurgical and surgical techniques. 69% of patients had odontoid fractures. Mean age of patients was 52 years. Patients were subjected to clinical assessment of axial cervical range of motion for rotation, using a handheld goniometer. Patients were also subjected to functional CT-scanning and measurements of total neck and atlantoaxial rotation were performed according to an established protocol. RESULTS: With clinical measurements mean range of motion for left and right axial neck rotation was both 56 degrees. According to the functional CT scans, the mean left-sided and right-sided axial neck rotation was 48.6 degrees and 52.0 degrees. The mean for left- and right-sided atlantoaxial rotation was 20.2 degrees and 20.6 degrees. Total axial atlantoaxial rotation on CT scans was 40.3 degrees and total axial neck rotation was 103.3 degrees. In comparison to age and gender matched normal individuals total cervical neck rotation was reduced to a mean of 69.5%. The differences between total axial neck rotation assessed using a handheld goniometer and with functional CT-scanning were strongly significant (P < 0.0001). In addition, there was no statistically significant correlation between the clinically assessed total neck rotation to either the left or the right side and the ipsilateral percentage atlantoaxial rotation of total head neck rotation. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that for the comparison of functional outcome after different therapies of C2 fractures clinical measurements do not serve for reliable data on total neck rotation and particularly atlantoaxial rotation and the percentage of C1-C2 rotation of total neck rotation. The use of dynamic CT-scans in the analysis of functional outcome after C2 fractures is strongly recommended.

Long-term investigation of nonsurgical treatment for thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures: an outcome analysis in sight of spinopelvic balance.

The nonsurgical treatment of thoracolumbar (TLB) and lumbar burst (LB) fractures remains to be of interest, though it is not costly and avoids surgical risks. However, a subset of distinct burst fracture patterns tend to go with a suboptimal radiographic and clinical long-term outcome. Detailed fracture pattern and treatment-related results in terms of validated outcome measures are still lacking. In addition, there are controversial data on the impact of local posttraumatic kyphosis that is associated, in particular, with nonsurgical treatment. The assessment of global spinal balance following burst fractures has not been assesed, yet. Therefore, the current study intended to investigate the radiographical and clinical long-term outcome in neurologically intact patients with special focus on the impact of regional posttraumatic kyphosis, adjacent-level compensatoric mechanisms, and global spine balance on the clinical outcome. For the purpose of a homogenous sample, strong in- and exclusion criteria were applied that resulted in a final study sample of 21 patients with a mean follow-up of 9.5 years. Overall, clinical outcome evaluated by validated measures was diminished, with 62% showing a good or excellent outcome and 38% a moderate or poor outcome in terms of the Greenough Low Back Outcome Scale. Notably, vertebral comminution in terms of the load-sharing classification, posttraumatic kyphosis, and an overall decreased lumbopelvic lordosis showed a significant effect on clinical outcome. A global and segmental curve analysis of the spine T9 to S1 revealed significant alterations as compared to normals. But, the interdependence of spinopelvic parameters was not disrupted. The patients' spinal adaptability to compensate for the posttraumatic kyphotic deformity varied in the ranges dictated by pelvic geometry, in particular the pelvic incidence. The study substantiates the concept that surgical reconstruction and maintenance of a physiologically shaped spinal curve might be the appropriate treatment in the more severely crushed TLB and LB fractures.