External validation of the ISARIC 4C Mortality Score to predict in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 in a Canadian intensive care unit: a single-centre historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: With uncertain prognostic utility of existing predictive scoring systems for COVID-19-related illness, the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC) 4C Mortality Score was developed by the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium as a COVID-19 mortality prediction tool. We sought to externally validate this score among critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 and compare its discrimination characteristics to that of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. METHODS: We enrolled all consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19-associated respiratory failure between 5 March 2020 and 5 March 2022 to our university-affiliated and intensivist-staffed ICU (Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada). After data abstraction, our primary outcome of in-hospital mortality was evaluated with an objective of determining the discriminative properties of the ISARIC 4C Mortality Score, using the area under the curve of a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 429 patients were included, 102 (23.8%) of whom died in hospital. The receiver operator curve of the ISARIC 4C Mortality Score had an area under the curve of 0.762 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.717 to 0.811), whereas those of the SOFA and APACHE II scores were 0.705 (95% CI, 0.648 to 0.761) and 0.722 (95% CI, 0.667 to 0.777), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ISARIC 4C Mortality Score is a tool that had a good predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 admitted to an ICU for respiratory failure. Our results suggest a good external validity of the 4C score when applied to a more severely ill population.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Compte tenu de l'utilité pronostique incertaine des systèmes de notation prédictive existants pour les maladies liées à la COVID-19, le score de mortalité ISARIC 4C a été mis au point par l'International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium en tant qu'outil de prédiction de la mortalité associée à la COVID-19. Nous avons cherché à valider en externe ce score chez les patient·es gravement malades atteint·es de COVID-19 admis·es dans une unité de soins intensifs (USI) et à comparer ses caractéristiques de discrimination à celles des scores APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) et SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté toutes les personnes consécutives admises pour insuffisance respiratoire associée à la COVID-19 entre le 5 mars 2020 et le 5 mars 2022 dans notre unité de soins intensifs affiliée à l'université et dotée d'intensivistes (Hôpital général juif, Montréal, QC, Canada). Après l'abstraction des données, notre critère d'évaluation principal de mortalité à l'hôpital a été évalué dans le but de déterminer les propriétés discriminatives du score de mortalité ISARIC 4C, en utilisant la surface sous la courbe d'un modèle de régression logistique. RéSULTATS: Au total, 429 patient·es ont été inclus·es, dont 102 (23,8 %) sont décédé·es à l'hôpital. La fonction d'efficacité du récepteur (courbe ROC) du score de mortalité ISARIC 4C avait une surface sous la courbe de 0,762 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,717 à 0,811), tandis que celles des scores SOFA et APACHE II étaient de 0,705 (IC 95%, 0,648 à 0,761) et 0,722 (IC 95%, 0,667 à 0,777), respectivement. CONCLUSION: Le score de mortalité ISARIC 4C est un outil qui a affiché une bonne performance prédictive de la mortalité à l'hôpital dans une cohorte de patient·es atteint·es de COVID-19 admis·es dans une unité de soins intensifs pour insuffisance respiratoire. Nos résultats suggèrent une bonne validité externe du score 4C lorsqu'il est appliqué à une population plus gravement malade.

Inflatable Penile Prosthesis in the Ambulatory Surgical Setting: Outcomes From a Large Urological Group Practice.

BACKGROUND: The definitive treatment for erectile dysfunction is the surgical implantation of a penile prosthesis, of which the most common type is the 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) device. IPP surgery in outpatient freestanding ambulatory surgical centers (ASC) is becoming more prevalent as payers and health systems alike look to reduce healthcare costs. AIM: To evaluate IPP surgical outcomes in an ASC as compared to contemporaneously-performed hospital surgeries. METHODS: A database of all patients undergoing IPP implantation by practitioners in the largest private community urology group practice in the United States, from January 1, 2013 to August 1, 2019, was prospectively compiled and retrospectively reviewed. Cohorts of patients having IPP implantation performed in the hospital vs ASC setting were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was to compare surgical data (procedural and surgical times, need for hospital transfer from ASC) and outcomes (risk for device infection, erosion, and need for surgical revision) between ASC and hospital-based surgery groups. RESULTS: A total of 923 patients were included for this analysis, with 674 (73%) having ASC-based surgery and 249 (27%) hospital-based, by a total of 33 surgeons. Median procedural (99.5 vs 120 minutes, P < .001) and surgical (68 vs 75 minutes, P < .001) times were significantly shorter in the ASC. While the risk for device erosion and need for surgical revision were similar between groups, there was no higher risk for prosthetic infection when surgery was performed in the ASC (1.7% vs 4.4% [hospital], P = .02), corroborated by logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 0.39, P = .03). The risk for postoperative transfer of an ASC patient to the hospital was low (0.45%). The primary reason for mandated hospital-based surgery was medical (51.4%), though requirement as a result of insurance directive (39.7%) was substantial. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: IPP implantation in the ASC is safe, has similar outcomes compared to hospital-based surgery with a low risk for need for subsequent hospital transfer. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The strengths of this study include the large patient population in this analysis as well as the real-world nature of our practice. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the review as well as the potential for residual confounding. CONCLUSION: ASC-based IPP implantation is safe, with shorter surgical and procedural times compared to those cases performed in the hospital setting, with similar functional outcomes. These data suggest no added benefit to hospital-based surgery in terms of prosthetic infection risk. Weinberg AC, Siegelbaum MH, Lerner BD, et al. Inflatable Penile Prosthesis in the Ambulatory Surgical Setting: Outcomes From a Large Urological Group Practice. J Sex Med 2020;17:1025-1032.

Interdisciplinary Systems-Based Intervention to Improve IV Hydration during Parenteral Administration of Acyclovir.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) hydration is considered a protective factor in reducing the incidence of acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity. A systems-based review of cases of acyclovir-associated acute kidney injury can be used to examine institution-, care provider-, and task-related factors involved in administering the drug and can serve as a basis for developing a quality improvement intervention to achieve safer administration of acyclovir. OBJECTIVES: To explore the effectiveness of the study institution's inter-disciplinary quality improvement intervention in increasing the dilution of acyclovir before IV administration. METHODS: After conducting a systems-based review for intervention development, a retrospective analysis was undertaken to compare IV administration of acyclovir in the 6-month periods before and after implementation of the intervention. The study population was a sequential sample of all patients over 18 years of age who were seen in the emergency department or admitted to a ward and who received at least one IV dose of acyclovir at the study institution. The primary outcome was the volume in which each acyclovir dose was delivered. The secondary outcomes were the hourly rate of fluid administration, the frequency of an increase in hourly hydration rate, and the incidence of acute kidney injury. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (44 in the pre-intervention period and 40 in the post-intervention period) received IV acyclovir and had evaluable data for the primary outcome. The median volume in which the acyclovir dose was administered was significantly higher in the post-intervention group (250 mL versus 100 mL, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, an easily implemented intervention significantly increased the volume of IV fluid administered to patients receiving acyclovir. Adequately powered prospective studies are suggested to investigate the effectiveness of this intervention on the clinically relevant incidence of acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity.

CONTEXTE: L'hydratation par voie intraveineuse est considérée comme un facteur de protection aidant à réduire l'incidence des cas de néphrotoxicité associés à l'acyclovir. Une analyse de systèmes des cas d'insuffisance rénale aiguë associés à l'acyclovir peut servir à examiner les facteurs liés aux établissements, aux fournisseurs de soins et aux tâches qui touchent l'administration du médicament et à générer ainsi une mesure visant l'amélioration de la qualité qui rendra l'administration d'acyclovir plus sûre. OBJECTIF: Étudier l'efficacité de la mesure interdisciplinaire visant l'amélioration de la qualité qui a été mise en œuvre dans l'établissement de l'étude et qui encourageait à diluer davantage l'acyclovir avant son administration par voie intraveineuse. MÉTHODES: Après avoir procédé à une analyse de systèmes pour générer une mesure d'intervention, une analyse rétrospective a été réalisée afin de comparer l'administration d'acyclovir par voie intraveineuse au cours des six mois précédant et suivant la mise en œuvre de la mesure. La population de l'étude était composée d'un échantillon progressif de tous les patients de plus de 18 ans ayant séjourné aux urgences ou dans un service intra-hospitalier et ayant reçu au moins une dose d'acyclovir par voie intraveineuse dans l'établissement concerné. Le principal paramètre d'évaluation était le volume de liquide contenant chaque dose d'acyclovir administrée. Les paramètres d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient : le débit horaire de liquide administré, la fréquence d'ajustement à la hausse du débit liquidien horaire et la fréquence des cas d'insuffisance rénale aiguë. RÉSULTATS: Quatre-vingt-quatre patients (44 dans la période précédant l'application de la mesure et 40 dans la période la suivant) ont reçu de l'acyclovir par voie intraveineuse et présentaient des données évaluables pour le paramètre principal. Le volume médian avec lequel chaque dose d'acyclovir était administrée était significativement supérieur dans le groupe suivant l'application de la mesure (250 mL contre 100 mL, p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: Cette étude montre qu'une mesure facile à mettre en place augmentait de façon significative le volume de liquides intraveineux administré aux patients recevant de l'acyclovir. L'on suggère de réaliser des études prospectives d'une puissance suffisante pour évaluer l'efficacité de cette mesure en ce qui a trait à la fréquence cliniquement significative des cas de néphrotoxicité associés à l'acyclovir.

Survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest on the Internal Medicine clinical teaching unit.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on patient outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) on the Internal Medicine clinical teaching unit (CTU). Accurate outcome data enhances discussions between patients, surrogates, and physicians, and assists in their management. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive "Code Blue" calls on 2 medical CTUs in a Canadian tertiary centre from January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2007. The medical records of identified patients were screened for eligibility and patient-specific and arrest-specific data were collected for eligible events. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Our cohort comprised 83 patients; including 54 (65.1%) men with a mean age of 75 years (range, 38-97). Infection (34.9%) was the principal reason for admission and over half of patients had 3 or more comorbid illnesses. Forty-three (51.8%) of the IHCA events were witnessed. In all, 39 (90.7%) of the witnessed and 36 (90%) of the unwitnessed arrests were pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole (P = not significant). Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 29 patients (34.9%) and 2 (2.4%) survived to hospital discharge. No patients survived to discharge after unwitnessed arrest. CONCLUSIONS: IHCA in Internal Medicine CTU patients is characterized by a high rate of PEA/asystole and a minimal chance of survival to hospital discharge. Moreover, no patient with an unwitnessed arrest survived to hospital discharge. While these findings require confirmation in a larger study, they merit consideration in the context of code status discussions, particularly with respect to the response to unwitnessed arrests.