Evaluation of image quality of wideband single-shot late gadolinium-enhancement MRI in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.

INTRODUCTION: While wideband segmented, breath-hold late gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been shown to suppress image artifacts associated with cardiac-implanted electronic devices (CIEDs), it may produce image artifacts in patients with arrhythmia and/or dyspnea. Single-shot LGE is capable of suppressing said artifacts. We sought to compare the performance of wideband single-shot free-breathing LGE against the standard and wideband-segmented LGEs in CIED patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively identified all 54 consecutive patients (mean age: 61 ± 15 years; 31% females) with CIED who had undergone CMR with standard segmented, wideband segmented, and/or wideband single-shot LGE sequences as part of quality assurance for determining best clinical practice at 1.5 T. Two raters independently graded the conspicuity of myocardial scar or normal myocardium and the presence of device artifact level on a 5-point Likert scale (1: worst; 3: acceptable; 5: best). Summed visual score (SVS) was calculated as the sum of conspicuity and artifact scores (SVS ≥ 6 defined as diagnostically interpretable). Median conspicuity and artifact scores were significantly better for wideband single-shot LGE (F = 24.2, p < .001) and wideband-segmented LGE (F = 20.6, p < .001) compared to standard-segmented LGE. Among evaluated myocardial segments, 72% were deemed diagnostically interpretable-defined as SVS ≥ 6-for standard-segmented LGE, 89% were deemed diagnostically interpretable for wideband-segmented LGE, and 94% segments were deemed diagnostically interpretable for wideband single-shot LGE. CONCLUSIONS: Wideband single-shot LGE and wideband-segmented LGE produced similarly improved image quality compared to standard LGE.

Racial Disparity in the Prescription of Anticoagulants and Risk of Stroke and Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy is proven to be effective at reducing risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, racial minorities with AF are less likely to be prescribed vitamin K anticoagulants (VKA). There is little information on the racial disparity in the prescription of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and the associated risks of stroke and bleeding. METHODS: We used data from the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse - a joint initiative across 11 Northwestern Medicine affiliated healthcare centers within metropolitan Chicago, Illinois. Newly diagnosed AF patients between Jan, 2011 and Dec, 2017 with CHA2DS2VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke/transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, female sex) score of 2 or more and no prior history of stroke or major bleeding were eligible. Logistic regression was used to examine differences in the prescription of any OAC and NOACs by race. Racial differences in the associations of NOACs prescription with incident stroke (a composite of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and cerebral embolism) and major bleeding were evaluated using Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 11,575 newly diagnosed AF patients with CHA2DS2VASc score of 2 or more, 48.7% (47.8-49.6) were on any OAC and among those 40.1% (38.8.3-41.4) received any NOACs. After adjusting for age, gender, income, insurance status, and stroke risk factors, the odds of receiving any OAC was .69 (95% CI: .58-.83) in blacks, .74 (.53-1.903) in Hispanics, and .75 (.58-.95) in Asians compared to whites. Among anticoagulated patients, blacks and Hispanics had significantly lower odds of receiving NOACs: .72 (.53-.97) and .53 (.29-.99), respectively. Use of NOACs, as compared to VKAs, was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke [.52(.31-.85)] and bleeding [.72(.54-.95)] in whites but not in non-whites [stroke: .71 (.22-2.31); bleeding .83(.43-1.57)] independent of other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Racial minorities with AF who are at risk of stroke were less likely to receive any OAC and NOACs specifically compared to whites even after accounting for insurance status, income, and stroke risk factors. Independent of other risk factors, use of NOACs as compared to VKA was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke and bleeding only in whites but not in non-whites.

Discriminative Ability of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED Score in Whites and Nonwhites.

The CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scoring systems are used in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to estimate risk of stroke and bleeding, respectively. Both were developed in minimally diverse European populations and these scores have not yet been extensively studied in US whites and nonwhites. In a retrospective cohort study, we included patients with AF who received inpatient or outpatient care in a large integrated academic health system from 2011 to 2017. Cox proportional hazards were used to analyze associations between stroke and CHA2DS2-VASc score in AF patients not prescribed anticoagulation and between incident bleeding and HAS-BLED score in anticoagulated patients. After exclusions for previous stroke, the cohort included 21,648 patients with a mean age of 66.8 ± 15.8. Anticoagulation was prescribed in 52% of whites and 46% of nonwhites (p < 0.001) with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc scores were 2.4 ± 1.6 in whites and 2.2 ± 1.6 in nonwhites and mean HAS-BLED scores was 1.5 ± 1.1 in whites and 1.3 ± 1.0 in nonwhites. After adjusting for baseline differences, the discriminative ability of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED was similar in whites and nonwhites (p = 0.52, 0.33, respectively). The discriminative ability of HAS-BLED was similar in patients on vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants. In conclusion, oral anticoagulation was prescribed less frequently in nonwhites. However, the discriminative ability of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED were similar in whites and nonwhites.

Comparison of physical therapy anatomy performance and anxiety scores in timed and untimed practical tests.

Students in health care professional programs face many stressful tests that determine successful completion of their program. Test anxiety during these high stakes examinations can affect working memory and lead to poor outcomes. Methods of decreasing test anxiety include lengthening the time available to complete examinations or evaluating students using untimed examinations. There is currently no consensus in the literature regarding whether untimed examinations provide a benefit to test performance in clinical anatomy. This study aimed to determine the impact of timed versus untimed practical tests on Master of Physical Therapy student anatomy performance and test anxiety. Test anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Differences in performance, anxiety scores, and time taken were compared using paired sample Student's t-tests. Eighty-one of the 84 students completed the study and provided feedback. Students performed significantly higher on the untimed test (P = 0.005), with a significant reduction in test anxiety (P < 0.001). Students who were unsuccessful on the timed test showed the greatest improvement on the untimed test ( x¯ = 20.4 ±10%). Eighty-three percent (n = 69) of students preferred the untimed test, 8.4% (n = 7) the timed test, and 8.4% (n = 7) had no preference. Students took on average eight minutes longer on the untimed test. This study found that physical therapy students perform better on untimed tests, which may be related to a reduction in test anxiety. If the intended goal of evaluating health care professional students is to determine fundamental competencies, these factors should be considered when designing future curricula.