The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma compared to histopathology; a retrospective single-center analysis of 119 patients1.

BACKGROUND: HCC as the 6th most common tumor entity with the fourth highest mortality and an increasing prevalence especially due to today's lifestyle acquires a high attention in the clinical setting. Beside CECT and CEMRI, CEUS depicts a dynamic, low-risk and radiation free imaging method that finds its use mainly in screening and active surveillance programs. PURPOSE: The aim of the retrospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS in correlation to pathologic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2018 a total number of 119 patients were included in this retrospective single-center study. Every patient underwent CEUS in addition to a native B-mode and Color-Doppler scan. After given informed consent SonoVue® (Bracco, Milan, Italy), a second-generation blood-pool agent, was used as contrast medium. Every examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). A low mechanical index (MI) of <0,2 was chosen to obtain a good imaging quality. RESULTS: All 119 included patients received CEUS followed by a liver biopsy for inter-modality comparison. In correlation to the pathology results, CEUS showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 96,6%, a specificity of 63,9%, a PPV of 86,7% and a NPV of 88,5% by detecting liver lesions suspicious for HCC. According to the Cohen's Kappa coefficient (k = 0,659) CEUS shows a strong inter-modality agreement in comparison to the histopathological finding. CONCLUSION: With a high sensitivity and a strong cross-modality comparability to histopathology, the CEUS is highly effective in the detection of suspicious HCC lesions.

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) juxtaposed to MRI findings; a retrospective single-center analysis of 292 patients.

BACKGROUND: HCC is the most frequent primary liver cancer entity. Major risk factors comprise chronic HBC and HCV infections, ALD or NAFLD. Apart from the anamnesis, the clinical examination and serologic analysis, an essential part of the diagnostic HCC work-up is due to imaging findings from sonography, CT or MRI scans. HCC lesions feature a distinct vascularization pattern: hyperenhancement during early arterial and hypoenhancement/wash-out during portal venous or delayed phases. CEUS facilitates dynamic assessment of microperfusion patterns of suspicious liver lesions. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present retrospective single-center study was to determine the diagnostic value of CEUS for assessing HCC by comparison with findings from MRI scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2004-2018 292 patients with suspicious liver lesions underwent CEUS and MRI. All patients underwent native B-mode, Color Doppler and CEUS after given informed consent. The applied contrast agent was a second-generation blood pool agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Milan, Italy). Every CEUS examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB Level 3). RESULTS: CEUS was performed on all included patients without occurrence of any adverse effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 91%, a PPV of 95% and a NPV of 94% for analyzing HCC in comparison with MRI as the diagnostic gold standard. CONCLUSION: With a distinguished safety profile CEUS shows a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing HCC compared to corresponding results from MRI scans.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnostic evaluation of popliteal artery aneurysms, a single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) are the most common peripheral artery aneurysms. Most common cause is arteriosclerosis. Acute thromboembolic limb ischemia and rupture of the PAA depict severe complications. Diagnostic tools for identifying PAAs are (Doppler) ultrasound, CT/MR angiography and DSA. PURPOSE: The aim of the present retrospective single-center study is to assess the application and safety of CEUS for assessing untreated and treated PAAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 13 patients were included in this study on whom CEUS was performed between 2007-2016. CEUS examinations were performed and interpreted by an experienced single radiologist (EFSUMB Level 3). RESULTS: CEUS allowed for the detection of PAAs in all cases. CEUS allowed for detection of partial thrombosis of PAA in 7/8 of untreated patients, proper exclusion of PAA upon femoro-popliteal bypass in 3 patients, incomplete exclusion of PAA upon femoro-popliteal bypass in 1 patient and ruling out of in-stent stenosis in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: CEUS is a useful and safe tool for in real-time evaluation of PAAs in the pre-/post-treatment status. In addition to conventional (Doppler) ultrasound and as an alternative tool to more elaborate imaging modalities, CEUS might be integrated in the future diagnostic work-up and follow-up of PAA patients.

Long-term study analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a hyperplastic mass of vascular abnormality and the second most common benign liver lesion. It can be discovered incidentally or during a surveillance examination in patients at risk for hepatic malignancy, mostly by conventional ultrasound. CEUS has been used as an additional alternative method for the rapid diagnosis of FNH. However, none of the previous studies compared the diagnostic performance of CEUS to MRI retrospectively in a 10-year observation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this long-term retrospective study is to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS in the imaging of FNH and compare the results to MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single experienced physician performed CEUS examinations in 244 patients between 2009 and 2019 with suspected focal nodular hyperplasia after conventional ultrasound. A second-generation blood pool agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Milan, Italy) was administered. Additional dynamic MRI with contrast agent was performed in a subgroup of 95 patients. RESULTS: Out of 244 patients, FNH could be displayed in 221 patients on CEUS. A subgroup of 95 patients had CEUS examinations and CEMRI for diagnosis comparison. In comparison with CEMRI, CEUS presented a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 76%, a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 89%. CONCLUSION: CEUS is a safe and feasible approach that assess the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia equally to MRI. The focal lesion enhancement can be depicted in real-time in the arterial, venous and late phase facilitating the prompt diagnosis.

Performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared to MRI in the diagnostic of gallbladder diseases.

BACKGROUND: Conventional ultrasound and MRI are very important techniques for the detection of gallbladder alterations. In the past years, studies showed that the additional use of contrast media to the conventional ultrasound allows the early depiction of pathological microvessels and their flow elucidating suspect findings stipulating the prompt therapy approach. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the performance of CEUS in gallbladder diseases and compare it to MR imaging using histopathological findings as a gold standard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective mono-center study analysed 18 patients with gallbladder alterations between 2009 and 2017. All patients underwent CEUS and MRI examinations and all results were confirmed in the pathology. CEUS images were performed and interpreted by a single experienced physician. RESULTS: CEUS imaging results compared to MR imaging of the gallbladder demonstrated a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 67% and a negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: CEUS enables the depiction and characterization of important vascularization's patterns facilitating the early differentiation between malignant and benign findings. In this study, CEUS displayed a better diagnostic accuracy than MRI proving to be a valuable additional tool to the established imaging modalities.

Single-center study: The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessing focal splenic lesions compared to CT and MRI.

BACKGROUND: Frequently focal splenic lesions (FSL) - cysts, hemangioma, hamartoma, metastases or infarction amongst others - are incidentally found within the scope of the sonographic examination of the abdomen. By using native B-mode and Color Doppler the underlying entity often is not elucidated. Thus, more elaborate imaging modalities like CT and MRI scans with their associated risks are used to clarify the entity of FSL. PURPOSE: The aim of the present retrospective single-center study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS examination for assessing splenic focal lesions by comparison with findings from CT and MRI scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2010-2018 46 patients were included in the study. All patients underwent native B-mode, Color Doppler and CEUS after given informed consent. The applied contrast agent was a second-generation blood pool agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Milan, Italy). CEUS examinations were performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB Level 3). RESULTS: All patients were examined without occurrence of any side effects. In total, 53 FSL were investigated (9% traumatic vs. 91% non-traumatic). Compared to CT, CEUS showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of 100% for assessing infarction, hematoma, hamartoma, cystic and malignant lesions. In comparison with MRI, CEUS presented a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of 100% for evaluating pseudolesions, hemangioma, hamartoma, cystic and malignant lesions. CONCLUSION: With an excellent safety profile CEUS shows an equipollent diagnostic performance for differentiating FSL compared to CT and MRI scans.

[Modern sonographic imaging of abdominal neuroendocrine tumors]. / Moderne sonographische Bildgebung bei neuroendokrinen Tumoren des Abdomens.

BACKGROUND: Radiological and nuclear medical diagnostics play an important role in the work-up of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). The sonographic examination, including contrast-enhanced examination, depicts an initial imaging modality to screen for NET. This report describes the sonomorphological behavior of ileal and pancreatic NET as well as hepatic metastases from NET. CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Sonographic evaluation of NET of the small intestine, pancreas and neuroendocrine hepatic metastases. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), unenhanced ultrasonography. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). PERFORMANCE: CEUS supports unenhanced ultrasound in the detection of NET and the differential diagnosis of unclear lesions, and is more sensitive for liver metastases (sensitivity according to the literature, 99% vs. 68%) PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: CEUS allows initial evaluation of NET and differentiation of benign vs. malignant lesions. Nevertheless, CEUS cannot replace more elaborate imaging modalities like CT or MRI for thorough staging examinations.

[Acute abdomen - gastrointestinal causes]. / Akutes Abdomen ­ gastrointestinale Ursachen.

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Diagnostic imaging plays a crucial role in the assessment and stratification of pathologic conditions causing acute abdomen. This report provides information on etiology, clinical manifestations and therapeutic options for six common diseases resulting in acute abdomen-appendicitis, cholecystitis, bowel obstruction, diverticulitis, acute pancreatitis, and viscus perforation. PERFORMANCE: Besides initial ultrasound, CT scans often represent the imaging gold standard for the diagnostic evaluation of acute abdomen. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Depending on the underlying pathologic condition, sonography or CT is suitable for the stratification of the gastrointestinal disease causing acute abdomen.

The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the diagnostic evaluation of hepatic echinococcosis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic echinococcosis (HE) is a zoonosis and depicts a rare but potentially lethal disease caused by larval infestation of E. multilocularis (alveolar echinococcosis, AE) and E. granulosus (cystic echinocococcosis, CE). In many countries, HE is a critical public health problem. Clinically, HE patients initially are often asymptomatic for years. Depending on the echinococcal manifestations patients can later develop unspecific symptoms as fatigue, abdominal pain and may present with elevated transaminases, jaundice and hepatomegaly. The combination of grey scale ultrasound and serological tests has been the gold standard for the screening and diagnosis of HE. Besides MRI, CT and FDG-PET scans, safe and directly accessible contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) may easily help to indirectly describe perilesional inflammation. Upon diagnosis of HE, an appropriate therapeutical strategy should be evaluated in a multidisciplinary way. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present retrospective monocenter study is to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS examination in the evaluation of hepatic echinococcal manifestation by comparison with CT, MRI, FDG-PET scans and histopathology. METHODS: Out of 36 patients with echinococcal disease (16 patients with E. multilocularis infection, 12 patients with E. granulosus infection and 8 patient with unspecified Echinococcus infection) 8 HE patients (4 patients with E. multilocularis, 2 patients with E. granulosus and 2 patients with unspecified echinococcal liver disease) were included in this study on whom CEUS was performed between 2008-2016. The applied contrast agent was a second-generation blood pool agent (SonoVue ®, Bracco, Milan, Italy). CEUS examinations were performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist with more than 15 years of experience. RESULTS: All patients were examined without occurrence of any side effects. In all 4 AE patients, contrast enhancement could be detected by means of CEUS and was confirmed by MRI or PET-CT scan. In the remaining 4 patients (CE and unspecified echinococcosis), doppler ultrasonography, CEUS and corresponding CT or MRI scans could not detect any hypervascularization of the lesions of interest. The histopathological analysis did not reveal any viable parasite material. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100% compared to MRI, CT or FDG-PET-CT. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS depicts a safe method for the evaluation of echinococcal liver disease. In addition to serological tests and grey scale ultrasound, CEUS imaging could be integrated as an easily accessible tool helping to describe hypervascularization as a sonomorphological correlate for active perilesional inflammation of echinococcal manifestations. CEUS may further help to differentiate between CE and AE and also to evaluate treatment outcome.

[Reliable diagnosis of cystic renal lesions]. / Sichere Diagnostik zystischer Nierenläsionen.

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Cystic renal lesions are commonly seen during routine ultrasound examinations of the abdomen. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Some cystic renal lesions cannot be sufficiently characterized using native ultrasound. In these cases additional imaging might be necessary. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a reliable imaging modality to characterize cystic renal lesions. Contrast enhancement of septations and the cystic wall are visualized in high resolution. This information helps to categorize the cystic renal lesions applying the CEUS Bosniak classification. This classification helps to estimate the probability of a malignant etiology of cystic renal lesions. PERFORMANCE: Using CEUS, cystic renal lesions can be characterized with a high sensitivity and specificity. ACHIEVEMENTS: The advantages of CEUS include that there is no effect on the function of the kidneys or the thyroid gland and no radiation exposure. In some cases, additional cross-sectional imaging is necessary to optimize diagnostic accuracy. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: CEUS is a helpful imaging modality to characterize cystic renal lesions, to avoid unnecessary follow-ups and to detect malignant cystic renal lesions.

Thawing of cryopreserved mobilized peripheral blood--comparison between waterbath and dry warming device.

BACKGROUND: Thawing of cryopreserved mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) is routinely performed for autologous and allogeneic MPB transplantation. Usually thawing is achieved by submerging the cell bag in a waterbath (37 degrees C temperature). We compared the effectiveness of thawing cryopreserved MPB in a waterbath with an electric dry-warming device containing warmed gel pads (Sahara, Transmed). METHODS: Two cryopreserved bags from each of 31 apheresis procedures were thawed in a waterbath and under dry conditions in parallel. Viability (dye exclusion), apoptosis/necrosis (annexin/propidiumiodide staining) and clonogenic potential (CFU-E plus BFU-E, CFU-GM) of the cells were tested after thawing. RESULTS: Statistical analysis by Wilcoxon matched-pair test showed no significant difference between the thawing procedures in terms of the in vitro parameters tested. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that thawing of cryopreserved MPB using dry warming and water bath give similar viability, apoptosis/necrosis rate and clonogenic potential. Both procedures take about the same amount of time and are easy to perform. Nevertheless, the potentially decreased risk of bacterial contamination of either the cell product or the patient room, and guidelines of good clinical practice (GCP), favor the use of the dry warming procedure.